ITT: books that trigger /pol/tards, haploid-autists and wiki-warriors
ITT: books that trigger /pol/tards, haploid-autists and wiki-warriors
Colton Russell
Jayden Morales
...
Eli Wilson
...
Luke Russell
...
Easton Moore
...
Levi King
...
Lucas Young
...
Josiah Rogers
...
Asher Robinson
>95 years old
>Abendland still there
>In 1903, he failed his doctoral thesis on Heraclitus (titled Der metaphysische Grundgedanke der Heraklitischen Philosophie, The Metaphysical Fundamental Thought in Heraclitean Philosophy, and conducted under the direction of Alois Riehl) because of insufficient references, which effectively ended his chances of an academic career.
What a loser.
Jace Ortiz
Oh look, an angry reply by the wiki-warrior!
Most effective post yet!
Daniel Jenkins
...
Noah Martin
...
Evan Lewis
Pic related may as well be titled "shut the fuck up you retarded /fringe/fag".
Lucas Bailey
...
Parker Edwards
...
Nicholas Walker
Wtf is a wiki-warrior?
Noah Hall
Someone whose only recourse to an explanation or argument is quoting a wiki page.
Not that that's inherently bad, some pages are particularly good, but it demonstrates a lack of awareness of source material in more obscure topics.
Henry Reyes
Pretty much everything from Tatu Vanhanen after 1999 fits in this category.
Brayden Sanders
...
Nolan Mitchell
...
Levi Wood
Not book length, but boy oh boy will you make a /pol/ack hopping mad if you get them to read it.
Henry Bell
...
Aaron Martinez
...
Blake Price
...
Elijah Bell
...
Grayson Ramirez
...
Nathan Peterson
This seems interesting, even though there's probably a lot of leftist babble in it.
Charles Brown
Have you read the book? It's garbage and was consider garbage when it came out. It's literally pseudo-science that only inbred retards (like Hitler) took seriously.
pic related
Carson Reed
>Hitler
You didn't read it. Don't talk shit wiki-pro. The actual reaction of the National Socialists on Spenglers works is mainly calling it attacks on their ideology.
Ryan Gonzalez
We know that Hitler read it when he was in prison and that he loved it. Stop being retarded. I was talking about the 20s, not the 30s.
Also I did read it when I was in school. It's not really highbrow.
Jason Richardson
>We know that Hitler read it when he was in prison and that he loved it
Hitler didn't like it according to Hess.
Especially after the Great War the book became a success. Mann liked it first at release.
>It's not really highbrow.
And that is bad?
Nathaniel Collins
>Hitler didn't like it according to Hess.
Well I don't know what you sources are but mine is the the critical edition edition of Mein Kampf. He didn't love it according to the quote there but he didn't dislike it either. I concede that cause I misremembered. Still, he read it and felt it was important enough to express an opinion on it (I should have stood by my inital claim, that Hitler took it seriously).
>And that is bad?
No, it's really easy accesible that's why even High Schooler can understand it. Mostly because it oversimplifies and streamlines way too much to be a scientific work. Granted I have only read historians writing about it but they shit on Der Untergang.
David Miller
>Auseinandersetzung mit der AfD
Didn't read this, is this by any chance biased? This party is a hot topic as you know (also German here).
Anyways, maybe give it another shot man. Especially the first book about the basis of the morpholgy itself. "Vom Sinn der Zahlen" is a great chapter if you know some of the concepts. Since I don't know too much about its reception I opened the German wiki (how ironic isn't it) and there the Heß statement stands directly above a claim where he shows distain for Spengles pessimism.
Can you see that peer pressure in an age where universal human rights are regarded as untouchable might create some disdain for his works?
Also: are you ?
Liam White
>leftist babble
i found the Trumper
David Powell
>trumper
found the bbc lover