Which number is more absurd?

Which number is more absurd?

6 millions Jews or 100 millions Natives?

>Which number is more absurd?
Your mother waiting 9 months to shit you out.

>t. jidf

kek

100 million natives. more like 10 million.

...

>Using those weak-ass numbers when you can compare Chinese Jesus or jungle commies instead
You're basically asking what's spicier out of butter and mayonnaise.

100 billion Jewish Natives

>what number is more absurd, the one that has documents and research to support it, or the one that was just the highest number some random guy thought of

106 gazilion Armenian Jewish Natives.

1 not pregnant Anne Frank.

50 million Turkocypriots

burned

100 million natives. the 6 million Jew figure is actually supported by census figures and whatnot.

...

100 mil natives. There couldn't be more then 5 millions of indians in total in Americas

The untold millions of blond haired white europeans kidnapped by the arab slave trade

this desu senpai

fuck off alt-right

>100 millions Natives
There simply weren't 100 million natives. And those there were were killed, mainly, by disease.

>everyone I don't like is alt-right: a child's guide to arguing.jpeg

Small Pox played a rather minimal role in American Indian relations. The ravages of the disease on the continent had mostly subsided by the time of Jamestown and British settlement began in earnest. It was less the work of 'small pox' than deliberate ethnic cleansing carried out at all levels from individual settlers acting on their own to state militias and the federal government itself that wiped Indians from the expanse of the land.

>sardinians and corsicans
>white, let alone blonde
kek

>1000 miles