Stab in the back theory was rea

...

>Jewish-led Bolshevik revolution
>a ragtag band of plebs who were all executed and dumped in the river

I think this would be a better division.

these dumbwojacks are beginning to scare me

I like the one with the really small pencil head. it reminds me of the baby from Eraserhead.

...

>lead by Jews
>self proclaimed revolution
>in the name of Communism
Does it have to be successful for it to be a revolution? If so, I think it'd be more proper to to label it a "Jewish-lead attempted Communist revolution".

das autor auf zis Poste.... ein prussiANUSch
warum? der prussiANUSch ist ein animal

No there wasn't.

There WAS a communist uprising, and many of the leaders were Jewish, but this happened two months after the Kaiser abdicated.

I don't like how big Prussia is, unless it is so full of Poles with universal suffrage that Berlin is renamed Błotny.

I guess you could spit off Silesia and East Prussia. But splitting off Posen and Pomerania as well, like what was done in the first map posted, would not work.

*split off

>t. bavarian enraged by the thought of rightful independence for Franconian and Swabian lands

It started pretty spontaneously by people who admired Luxemburg and Liebknecht. Her last writings reveal that she was actually pretty reluctant to take on a leading role, because she recognized this was not a mass revolution but just an autistic uprising doomed for failure.

>because she recognized this was not a mass revolution but just an autistic uprising doomed for failure
they saw what happened in Russia
no wonder they feared this
this was a Jewish coup attempt within the country
the idea that this had no bearing on the course of the war is fucking idiotic

I'm not claiming that Germany would have won
I think USA joining (after the Balfour declaration promised Israel to world Jewry) after Jewish media propganda had more to do with it
but it was a stab in the back back home

>this was a Jewish coup attempt within the country
the idea that this had no bearing on the course of the war is fucking idiotic
are you still confusing the "Jewish" Spartacist uprising which happened after the war with the Weimar revolution?

In 2011 the German historian Thomas Weber claimed Adolf Hitler played a role in the Bavarian Soviet Republic. He suggests that two days after the People's State of Bavaria was reclaimed, Hitler ran for and won a position in Eisner’s government, taking the position of “Deputy Battalion Representative”, where some of his duties included serving as a liaison officer with the Department of Propaganda.[20][21] He further claims that after Eisner was assassinated in February 1919, Hitler attended the funeral and in solidarity with the socialist republic and with Eisner, a Jewish Marxist reformer, he wore a black armband on one arm and a red communist brassard on the other, as evidenced by surviving film footage of the funeral.[20] In the footage, Hitler and a few men from his unit are seen walking in Eisner's procession. Furthermore, one of Heinrich Hoffmann's photos of the procession showed Hitler in attendance, taken just before Eisner was eulogized.[20]

British historian Ian Kershaw contends that even after Eisner’s funeral, when the republic was under control of the Communist Councils in April 1919, Hitler probably “wore, along with almost all the soldiers of the Munich garrison, the revolutionary red armband.”[22]. One reason cited for his participation in his battalion activities is that Hitler had also been “elected to the Soldier’s Council of his military unit”, the Ersatz Battalion of the infantry Regiment. [23]

Hitler “remained in his post for the entire lifespan of the Soviet Republic,” and “did not join a Freikorps with his comrades prior to the defeat of the Soviet Republic.”[24] Hitler’s failure to assist in the liberation of Munich from the communist Räterepublik later brought him “scornful reproaches from Ernst Röhm,” head of the Nazi Stormtroopers.[25] Otto Strasser, a member of the Social Democratic Party before later joining the Nazi party in 1925, also criticized Hitler for not joining General von Epp’s army “to fight the Bolsheviks in Bavaria,” asking: “Where was Hitler that day?”[26] Strasser was one of the Freikorps volunteers who entered Munich to overthrow the Bavarian Soviet Republic. During this time, Hitler “did not act in a way consistent with his later beliefs,” but instead appeared to be a “deeply disorientated man without a clear mental compass” to help him understand the post-war world.[27]

After the fall of Eugen Leviné’s “Red Republic” in early May 1919, Hitler may have also been “interned” with other soldiers involved in the communist government, and questioned about his loyalty.[28] Ernst Toller, the president of the socialist republic for 6 days, “reported that a fellow prisoner also interned… had met Hitler in a Munich barracks during the first months after the revolution, and that the latter had then been calling himself a Social Democrat.”[29] Konrad Heiden in his 1936 book Hitler remarked that, during this time period, “Hitler in heated discussion among his comrades, voiced support for the Social Democratic government against that of the Communists.”[30] When Hitler defended Hermann Esser in 1921 from intra-Nazi party squabbles, he remarked: “Everyone was at one time a Social Democrat.”[31]

Explain this, stormkikes.

Stab in the back theory is fals-
isj.org.uk/the-mass-strike-in-the-first-world-war/
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Association_of_German_Trade_Unions

>germany totally could have won if those dirty fucking jews and commies didn't betray us at the last second
Excessive optimism should be a crime

>In 2011 one historian claimed Hitler was a communist
>Here are all of my zero sources
Why even bother posting?

>at the last second
*Throughout the whole war

...

The war was effectively over by this point. The Spartacus rebels (overwhelmingly non-Jewish) thought they could seize the weak, kingless government and join up with the Bolsheviks to turn their Weltkrieg into a global class war that would defend the German people from Allied imperialism.

Instead they failed, and the dying Imperial government was supplanted by a weak and friendless liberal republic that bowed to humiliating demands from the Western allies.

/pol/ guys have an acidic revulsion to learning actual history

If you're reffering to the Spartacus uprising, that happened in 1919 after the war

>the idea that the Spartacist Uprising had no bearing on the course of the war is iditiotic
>in 1919

This is what stormfaggots actually believe.

You must have a huge penis.

No, there wasn't. Look at the timeline of WW1 and the communist insurrection

/pol/ lied to you

>Spartacist Uprising Didnt happen
Wut

>All of the faggots taking the b8
Is Veeky Forums the easiest board to troll?

You're both wrong

The Spartacists were constructing a time machine to back when the war was taking place and had they succeeded the western allies would have won
Wut

It happened months after the Tsar had abdicated and much of the military had revolted

I find the fact that they failed so hard quite amusing, they had way better weapons and a good time to fight.
Useless commies man.