Why is Hitler and the nazis seen as this great evil, when Stalin, Mao and the japs were objectively much worse...

Why is Hitler and the nazis seen as this great evil, when Stalin, Mao and the japs were objectively much worse. Is it just because they lost the war? How did the japs avoid this disproportionate amount of shame, they lost the war too. Is it because of the nukes and the implications that they bring?

>Why is Hitler and the nazis seen as this great evil, when Stalin, Mao and the japs were objectively much worse

Because Slavs/Chinese/Japanese aren't really people

Everyone sees them as evil

Because they weren't worse.

What an original, interesting and thought-provoking topic that has barely been discussed on this board

chinks hate the fuck out of japs.

>objectively much worse
t. /pol/

because muh jews, why is this thread even on Veeky Forums?

Everyone in east asia fucking hates the Japs. You just don't know about it because you're on the other side of the world.

&humanities ;^)

depends on what your definition of "evil" is, hitler gets a worse reputation in western society because of a 1. comparative lack of interest of russian/asian societies and 2. the nazi systematic method of jewish persecution is taught to be one of the most inhumane events in history

Personally, i'd say that pic related is the most "evil", but it's as futile as arguing over who/what was the greatest "good" in human history

>t. /pol/
pot?

Why do you care so much?

The jews/leftist white trash control media and western academia

asia was expected to be awful. they'd hoped germany would do better.

>Le Stalin was worse meme
Stalin was shit but if you unironically believe he was worse than Hitler then you need to be euthanized.

>MUH EBUL JUDEN

/thread

Unironically this. The west doesn't give a shit about Asians unless they're exploiting them or competing against them.

hitler was an idiot who destroyed his countries (Austria and Germany)

Stalin and Mao made their countries stronger (or stalin did at least, Mao got bested by fucking sparrows)

Because Leftists are cancer

because they took Her from us

>Stalin made his country stronger

That's debatable - policies like 'not one step back' undoubtedly did more harm than good and played right into the Blitzkrieg tactic used by the Germans.

Also gulags. Don't underestimate the impact of losing tens of millions of citizens within a few decades.

100 years ago Russia had a larger population than the USA - if it had had the same growth it would have 350 million or more citizens by now.

Imagine how much not just Russia but humanity has lost through this.

stalin killed communism, so he is worse than hitler

>That's debatable - policies like 'not one step back' undoubtedly did more harm than good and played right into the Blitzkrieg tactic used by the Germans.

t. brainlet with 0 comprehension of how a war is won

the USSR had the superior logistics they had the ability to arm 10s of millions of their citizens and grind the nazi war machine to a halt. The only reason the krauts were stopped was because of policies like that. The attack on Moscow was slowed because of the necessity of mopping up troops in Ukraine. This gave time to evacuate valuable industry and enact scorched earth policies. This let them organize a winter counter offensive, driving the Germans back from Moscow and forcing them to begin a southward offensive that culminated in stalingrad, which would lead to a decisive blow that pretty much dashed all hopes of a German military victory.

>100 years ago Russia had a larger population than the USA - if it had had the same growth it would have 350 million or more citizens by now.

The Russian Empire, which comprised far more than just what Russia is today. Combined the USSR . In 1974 the USSR outnumbered the US population wise by 87 million people lol.

literally kys. Stalin objectively made his country stronger. When he took power it was a weakened version of one of the weakest countries in Europe pre-revolution. By the time he died it was a nuclear armed superpower that had spread its ideology to over 1/3rd the population of the entire earth. How the fuck is that not stronger???

kek

>kill millions of people and subvert the West
>kill millions more people and subvert the West
I think Stalin is worse.

>Also gulags. Don't underestimate the impact of losing tens of millions of citizens within a few decades
Things that never happened. Most deaths in the Soviet Union came from the famine of 1932-1933. There is no proof that tens of millions died in Gulag camps.

>Stalin
Everybody has at least some sympathy with gommunism because it tends to be a very idealistic ideology.

>Mao
Didn't affect white people, who cares.

>Japan
Didn't affect white people, who cares.

USA (1960) - 179,323,175
Soviet Union (1959) - 208,826,650
And that's after WW2 and Stalin. I choose 1959 census because 1937/1939 is questioned by many historians. In 1926 there were 147 027 915 people living in the SU.

>subvert the West
The West subverted the East more than the East subverted the West.

BECAUSE MEN HAVE ALWAYS BEEN JEALOUS OF HOT, BLUE-EYED GUYS WITH NICE DICKS!!!

You can say that again!!!

WE HAVE THIS THREAD EVERY DAY
IT NEVER COMES TO ANYTHING
STOP MAKING IT