There is no debunking this

There is no debunking this

BUMP

i'm not smart enough to understand this autism

Legitimizes. The word is legitimizes. Also, "Legitlmates" is spelled incorrectly. Oh, and those blocks shape one another. The fact it doesn't say that (it's only one way) is inherently wrong.

>cultural marxist babble

People are the base, complex machinery and the societies that enable them are the superstructure desu

Everything is downstream from genetics

What does this even mean? You can arbitrarily divide ANYTHING into two categories, that doesn't mean you've done something meaningful when you do so. There is no separation between our "productive" and our "consumptive" natures, they're both part of the same process of living.

People's relation to production is the base

There's no meaningful line between the structure and superstructure.

What do you mean?

If somebody works for the FDA testing drugs to make sure if they work, is that politics (superstructure) or production (base).

What if its the guy determining FDA test protocols?

What about a political advocacy group pushing the FDA to change their test protocols.

What about the farmers almanac that the farmers use to time the weather and try and produce more crops? Is that media (superstructure) or raw materials (base).

What about a NOAA satellite examining weather patterns for the benefit of US farmers.

Politics, education, and media are inextricably connected with production.

No, this is real marxism, not cultural "marxism".

Politics, education, and media are determined by production. Economics is the core of human society.

Cultural Marxism is a meme, bruv

And society is the core of economics.

??? what??? Can you please explain how that makes sense?

>cultural marxists don't exist in the left

Please explain what a cultural marxist is and how your picture relates to it.

>unfalsifiable drivel

Please elaborate

t. commie who can't understand the service sector or intangible value

The service sector cannot exist without production.

how can u claim that production is what drives society

It allows society to do other things. We can live in a world with no service sectors and only a production sector, it would not be a great society but it can happen. We cannot have a society that has no production sector but has a service sector, however.

you didn't answer my question at all

how can you claim that production of anything is what's the most crucial and intrinsic thing to society

literally where is your evidence

What do you mean? It's not production of a single thing of course, but production in general.

where is ur proofs in connecting society and production in the way that u do

....human history? The economics of a certain time period always shape the people (among other things) of that time period.

well then where is your proof it is economics

because societies and cultures existed before money and even before production

and still do

>because societies and cultures existed before money and even before production
They still had to have a system of distributing goods otherwise they are not a society. They still needed a mode of production.

The basic anthropological interpretation here is that a society is a gathering of people done with production in the end.

Sexual reproduction is the crudest form of production in Marx's economic theory. If we accept sexual contact as the first way people came together, the rest follows that type of production.You can posit this relatively easily based on 1844 Manuscripts.

Production would be very inefficient without services.

There is no "superstructure" and "production", just supply and demand.

>The basic anthropological interpretation here is that a society is a gathering of people done with production in the end.

>Sexual reproduction is the crudest form of production in Marx's economic theory. If we accept sexual contact as the first way people came together, the rest follows that type of production.You can posit this relatively easily based on 1844 Manuscripts.

>Sexual reproduction is the crudest form of production in Marx's economic theory. If we accept sexual contact as the first way people came together,

>form of production in Marx's economic theory.

>in Marx's economic theory

>theory

get out

Not him but without society a product cannot reach the masses, so people will focus on self consumption, which they did in the past when society wasn't even part of the equation. If society has a choice on whether to reject or purchase a product, they wants and needs are at the top of the hierarchy, meaning that production has to be centered around society, making it the core of economics.