Aren't South Italians closer to the Late Romans than Northerners?

After all, the Northerners were invaded by Krauts.

Yes that's why north Italians hate Southern Italians

Making them a lesser race

No, south Italians are litteral products of rapes with njggers.

Romans had lighter skin and more diverse hair colors.

They do?

>njggers
>He can't show where Nigger DNA is in South Italians

>lighter skin more diverse hair colors
>Ayo hol up

Nordicists are more pathetic than Afrocentrists

They do

Keep memeing.
Anicent Romans didn't look like Sicilian rape babies.

They hate them because south italians are litteral lazy niggers.

>Nordicists
That's not actually a thing. It's a joke

>Lots of Greeks are and were swarthy
>The Romans weren't

Sure.

Contrary to pol memes, there hasn't been enough historic admixture to change phenotype very much in either the north or the south. Rome probably looked like Italy today. More fair and blonde in the north and swarthier down South. Also notable that most of the non-Italian citizens like Greeks, North Africans and Jews would have leaned towards swarthy. Though the Germanics obviously were fair.

>J-just pretending to be retarded

This
Southern Italy was always swarthier, the moors rape babies is a shit meme

pic related, from Pompei, Compania, way before the moors

Ignore history all you want, doesn't make it less true.

Jewish forgery

Not Italian

"Swarthy"

Those don't look like the people in Ops pic.

So the afrocentrics that falsely claim both that the moors were black and that the Romans were products of their blackness are wrong again? Who would have thought.

You must be American

Why exactly would Moors change roman phenotype, if they only look the way they do because they got raped by romans for centuries? If you want to see what "real" Moors look like, look more south into the regions that were not conquered by Romans.

>pretending Ancient Greek genetics doesn't show them as swarthy

>Being an afrocentric

They didn't look like Kunta Kinte

People are buying into the Afrocentric "we wuz moors" nonsense and assuming they would be black. But moors were basically MENA.

The Iliad doesn't describe them as such.

No it's not a thing because that assumes that so-called "nords" are different than central Europeans. Spoiler Alert, they aren't.

>A mythical story is more reliable than testing Ancient Greek remains from when the Bronze Age

You're surely misunderstanding what it said anyway.

"swarthy"

>The Greek samples were closest to modern European Jews and South Italians

Yes, swarthy.

But genetics from remains of that time period does. Blonde hair was rare (10%) but occurred sporadically like with Greeks today. They saw it as beautiful and thus described heroes that way.

Too a complex word for you?

Light hair and eyes have been found in Armenian remains.

>Africa is Niggerland

lol Amerifats.

For the most part. There is some artistic evidence that there was the occasional black moor. Probably the rare west African that assimilated into the north

Unfortunately thats becoming the standard.

You do know the whole "nordicist" thing is just a meme. Nobody claims greeks all had blonde hair blue eyes. They were the same as they are today. White with darker hair.

Correct but there is a growing myth that the moors were nogs.

No, there's a Nordicist brainlet on this board who believes the "original" Greeks were Nordic Indo-European conquerors who ruled over a mass of swarthy farmers and brought them the Greek language and culture.

It's not just a meme here. There are many people on pol and here that nonironically push it

>Fransesco Cosenza
>Not Italian

No there really isn't.

Push what? There is nothing to push.

Actually it's the opposite.

on paper.

Yeah that's the meme.

And DNA

in that case obama is "white".

don't think so.

>/POL/

Go back to /b/

According to your kind he is.

No he's not.

>doesn't deny being POL

What happened to the Brad Pitt looking Romans down south, Mr. Pol?

They are up north and central with all the civilized people.

The thing is Nordiists don't exist and Afrocentrics are part of the reason why we see shit threads like this.

I think pol is more informed than you.

Probably weren't the product of moor rape babies.

That's the Polish guy

I think he mostly do it to troll Meds

I don't know anyone who came themselves *meds*.

It's reminds of that Peruvian that called everyone eurorangs.

Yes, Romans would have been darker than modern Italians since swarthy Italians are the offspring of fair skinned Germanics and black Romans.

Yes we do.

That's also why italian americans are garbage. First, they are american, second south italian.

The worst of each part

>KANGZ

>we
>wuz
>kangz

Yes. Not to mention Sicilians were considered "Greek" in Roman times and are mostly descended from Greeks.

Cato the elder had reddish hair and grey eyes.

>Cato the elder had reddish hair and grey eyes.
Who say that?


You germanics are the worst

>Who say that?
Plutarch

Considering that the people of modern Lazio (AKA Latium) are both geographically and genetically closer to the south than north, yeah, probably. They look swarthy on average. Further adding to this is that Rome integrated southern Italy first, and didn't conquer what we now call northern Italy until relatively later (after famous events like the Second Punic War). But this autism about phenotypes needs to end. Olive skinned, brown/black haired, brown eyed, average height people with large noses and curly hair exist in overwhelming numbers all over the Italian peninsula, they're just rarer in the North than in the center or the south. Just like how pale, light haired, light eyed, tall people with small noses and straight hair exist everywhere, but are rarer in the south.

I don't know why Veeky Forums can't understand this, I've seen actual brothers and sisters with noticeably different colorations in skin, hair, and eyes (but similar enough facial features to tell that they're siblings).

Genetics test have proven no significant genetic difference between the regions of Italy except Sicily (which is about a third Greek) and the northeast and mountainous regions (which are about a quarter Germanic).

>black Romans
Oh really.
I would like to know more.

Yeah I don't get this whole thing. They were all whites. So what are we arguing about? IT's the niggers who keep claiming outright falsehoods that need to be dealt with.

It's just We Wuz/pol trolling.

Bullshit, Skin color does not determine intelligence, and in no way did ancient Italians have light skin, tired of Krauts like you trying to steal our culture. just like the Blacks do with Egyptians.

There were a few dozen thousand Krauts in a peninsula inhabited by many millions of people. They would not have impacted the genetic makeup of the population in any significant way.
Rape babies are the biggest meme in existence.

Yeah, it's a troll/joke started on /pol/.
I don't doubt that there might be some unironic nordicists out there, but they're not to be found here.

Nah, there's blacks that actually believe that shit.

Greeks were/are indo euro speakers, that's about it. Pretty sure he's memeing you

Greeks are much closer to Levantines than Western and Northern Euros are. Even if they speak a Indo-European language.

not a meme at all. you are 100% retarded if you think population change/replacement doesnt happen over a 2k year timescale

it takes as little as 30 years in places that have been documented like england, china, the middle east

I see you admit today's Southern Italians were closer to the Romans by the time of Rome's fall.

Other way around, and Greeks are essentially no different than other southern euros.

Outside of central Asia and the Americas, it is absolutely a meme. Very few conqueres outnumbered the conquered enough to effect their genetic makeup.

north africans ruled sicily and southern italy for 500 years and NEVER really recovered. the rcaptured provinces needed to be moved into the foothills to avoid raids and piracy, and no one from the north voluntarily moved there. this is a population bottleneck. they are closer to north africans than ancient italians for this reason.

>I am ignoring recent studies on Ancient Greek DNA.

Neither, ancient romans were black.

no. you are ignoring genetic studies. there is a stark contrast in the makeup of the people that corresponds to recent population movement

you're an idiot. ancient egypt had people 100% different from today. the ethiopians arose during the brone age collapse. english people didn't even fucking eist until the vikings invaded, and the upper class of england is 90% nordic. the plague itself spread nordic people throughout europe.

chinese population dynamics are such that they started in an area comparable to france, completely to the modern southern border.

you.

are.

dumb.

>there is a stark contrast in the makeup of the people that corresponds to recent population movement

The only notable difference between Ancient and Modern Greeks is that Modern ones have more non-Southern European in them. Surely from Slavs.

>ancient egypt had people 100% different from today.

Not according to that mummy study. Modern Egyptians just have some more Sub-Saharan African and Arab.

>some
you are fucking lying. the mummies are predominately r1a you lying faggot. the male lineage got invaded and GENOCIDED and replaced by j

the genes they have in common ith modern egyptians are basal farming genes shared by europeans and indians

they had been almost completely killed off you fucking liar. y dna doesnt just "disappear" and you maintain the same population

>the mummies are predominately r1a
>citation needed

>genocided

When was that?

They have more ssa now actually.

they'll cluster closer to populations that share even 30% of their dna if they share 0% ith others. this is an effect oft he compression of a genome into 10 bytes of data

these people don't fucking have descendant that share even 50% of their dna

they cluster as closely to odern egyptians as french do to russians

that doesnt mean russians descent from french. if russians killed every french and settled france, you'd claim there had been no population replacement, LOOK, a cluster plot so COOL

>Still hasn't shown evidence

Also, Copts.

your plot doesnt display haplotypes genius

further the copts are a good case to demonstrate my point

they're more closely related to ancient egyptians than muslim egyptians. their language is also even closer still. they have less ssa and are more intelligent on avg

they're currently being GENOCIDED and replaced

They look like colombians/venezuelans

>South Italians
>Romans

If only it was just trolling, There are plenty of niggers who are pushing this and that number is growing.

Step aside, barbarian

Lol, germanics are so bad they got civ from romans and greeks

Loo that is a germanic

Most of material culture is from east.