Like many of you biztards, I'm all in on link. I think they have the best concept of any coin right now.
But I have one concern. Their team is tiny. Excluding advisers, they have a team of only two people. That isn't enough to market and develop a coin.
Thoughts?
oh boy another link thread. how exciting!
kys
That's part of what an ICO is for
once they finish demo'ing the product they will move towards that sort of thing
Check their code base; tokens are not rocket science. The more people involved, the more messy and inconsistent the code will become. You don't need an army of retards. Plus, what they really have developed is an API for others to use.
>t. Software Engineer in Silicon Valley
Lads I need some serious advice. I have 25k Link. I also have 1.1K Bancor, and 100K Digibyte.
Laugh if you want but no FUD. Should I sell the others amd GO ALL INTO LINK?
I could put myself at 35K LINK with currwnt prices.
I just wish I was capitalizing on these triangles, but I just dont have the balls haha
this.
They have fucking Satoshi, even without the second scrub that would be enough developers. And marketing is unnecessary, we can do that for them
Its been in the work for three years. the product is finished
Listen very carefully to what I'm about to say.
Ambrosos wants to represent external data (food) on the blockchain.
Walton wants to represent external data (RFID tags) on the blockchain.
Ripple wants to represent external data (financial transactions) on the blockchain.
These use cases are ENTIRELY contained within ChainLink.
ChainLink is the skeleton key that makes all these projects obsolete. It gives every company the building blocks to use oracles that represent ANY data, not just single use cases like food/RFID/financial transactions, however they want.