Who was in the right/wrong here?

who was in the right/wrong here?

Persia was provoked, it did nothing wrong.
France only wanted to defend their homeland.
France only wanted to liberate Europe
France only wanted to protect itself
France with a sideways flag deserved their independence.

>France only wanted to defend their homeland.

Hol up, lemme fix it.
>A bunch of french-faggot dynasties squabble over the throne of France.

RIGHT

Persia
England
Russia
Russia, again
Prussia
Netherlands

Rome/Persia is too vague to call.
The Plantagenet claim to the French crown is just as legitimate as the Valois and Évreux claims.
Whether the ends justify Russia's means is debatable, but Russia's ends are certainly justified.
The invasion of Russia is the only part of the Napoleonic wars where France is in the wrong.
The Franco-Prussian war set things in motion that culminated in WWI being a clusterfuck of alliances instead of two Great Powers fighting over a proxy.
The Spanish refused to cooperate with the Dutch in any meaningful way. The rebellions in the Low Countries were a matter of time.

>The Franco-Prussian war set things in motion that culminated in WWI being a clusterfuck of alliances instead of two Great Powers fighting over a proxy.
You can't just blame a single conflict in an era of continuous power buildup between multiple great powers as the start of a world war, while the Franco-Prussian war was yet another step on the way it was far from the sole cause.

both were wrong
England
Poland
France
France
Spain

Although France was the agressor in the Franco-Prussian war Bismark deliberately played a complex game in order to make it look like France had been insulted. However Bismark did this to realise his dream of uniting Germany which in itself is a righteous task.

If the French didn't get destroyed by Prussia their foreign policy wouldn't have shifted towards containment of Germany. No containment means no French-Russian Alliance, which means no Triple Alliance to counterbalance, or possibly a continuation of the Three Emperors' League. Either scenario turns Austria's war with Serbia into a local subjugation, or possibly a war with Russia alone.

this

>uniting Germany
>righteous task

>French bully not so tough after being raped

Disgusting russianboos. Fall of the PLC was the biggest tragedy of the 18th century

this

They brought it upon themselves

>French not on the Zoroastrian side
Wrong

The right
Rome
The king of England should not have had his French possessions striped away
Russia because catholic Slavs should be under Austria not independent
Britain because Britain
France because Prussia should have allied austria all those years ago to beat back trance but didn’t
Spain because the Dutch are heretical money lenders

>german bully not so tough after being raped

>Russia because catholic Slavs should be under Austria not independent
retard

>Anti-French guy is most likely French
>Anti-German guy is most likely German

hmmm

your'e saying they should be under Russia?

Russia wanted to stabilize the region and ensure that they wouldn't have a foreign power that could be wielded against them by a third party. There were other ways to accomplish this besides dismantling the PLC but you can't deny that the ends were justified.

>Rome
>England
>Poland
>France
>Equal
>Netherlands

>The Plantagenet claim to the French crown is just as legitimate as the Valois and Évreux claims.
Salic Law, my nigger. Heritage through female lines is a retarded concept, thats why even the Anglos skipped to the direct male line when their king had no kiddies

Chilperic I amended the law to allow women to inherit if the deceased had no surviving sons. It was only with the inheritance of Valois that the use of an absolute agnatic succession began to spread among Europe and the law was only applied in this way to keep the English out.

>Persia
>England
>Poland
>France
>France
>Spain

So close