Good guys of history

Good guys of history.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_in_Poland
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Golden_Age
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Szigetvár
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ukrainian_War?wprov=sfla1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement?wprov=sfla1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Lithuanian_War?wprov=sfla1
youtube.com/watch?v=7vkYiCdn834
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

The Hebrews, also known as Phoenicians and Carthaginians. Their descendants exist today as Turks.

...

>tfw no timeline where PLC, France and Spain are allied, basically creating Big Catholic Blob

The Persians always seem to have been a civilized lot until fairly recently.

>multi-ethnic and multi-religious
>tolerant of all subject peoples
>not particularly savage in war
>consistently high living standards for the time
>always had great art, architecture, and culture
>always ruled a large population so aren't just 'good' by way of being irrelevant
>fought Gr**ks, R*mans, Ar*bs, T*rks, and other bad guys of history

Name one instance where they sided with the villains. Protip; you can't.

bad b8

Cringe

>invades Russia
>invades Russia
>invades Russia
>experiences eternal butthurt after Russia retaliates

Four partitions weren't enough. Do it again, Stalin.

>being invited to rule is the same as invading
Hmmmmmm, let's face it. Pic related would be much better for Russians than living under Tsars.

And on that day he lied to me
Like Martin Luther
Like Pericles

...

>"""invited to rule""" multiple times over several centuries
>somehow population doesn't support you despite their strong desire to be ruled by you
Dindunaffin. Is this what you seriously tell yourself?

Russians are dumb animals that love to be oppressed serfs. What's new.

We clearly prefer to be voluntary oppressed serfs of nordic master race and not polish subhumans.
Poles got rightfully btfo for thinking they were people.

>eternal habsburger

Poles:
>fight opression and want to be free at all cost
Russians:
>fight for opression and want to be slav(e)s

Eternal Ruskie everyone.

this post triggered me

>Pic related would be much better for Russians than living under Tsars.
This is soo wrong.
Enlightened Absolutism of the Russian Empire was in all sense superior to retarded and obsolete feudal Elective Monarchy of Polish Kingdom.
Polish Kingdom was rather intolerant to people of foreign faiths or cultures: while it itself was highly autonomous in the Russian Empire most of the time, it itself tried to enforce religious, cultural and political unity on its' many minorities, including Russians and Ukrainians.

Fuck off cockroat

There is nothing particularly good or bad about Poland at all.
Absolutely, completely asymbal foreign politics and strategy throughout pretty much the whole history, also Libirum Veto retardation.

>Enlightened Absolutism of the Russian Empire
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

>Occupy pre ww1 German lands
>take clay from soviets while in a weak state
>waaahhhh! Why do they hate Polen?

>implying that Germans have any rights to the lands they stole
>implying that Soviets have any rights to the former Russian Empire lands

Russia embraced Renaccance under Ivan the Great, 16th century.
Russia embraced Absolutism under Peter the Great, 17th century.
Russia Embraced Enlightenment under Catherine the great, 18th century.

Poland stood as a curious oddity of Early Medieval age until it was finally scrubbed off the map.

>implying that Germans have any rights to the lands they stole
>implying that Soviets have any rights to the former Russian Empire lands


>implying rights don't come from power and capacity to claim them

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_in_Poland
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Golden_Age

Excuse me? What lands?

kys croatnigger.

Then why you cry?
If might make right then why Germany do not stole these lands again?
Yeah - they are weak and more concerned with cultural and demographic suicide.

Fuck off, race traitor

well then germany and the soviets had all the rights to polands land

>Russia Embraced Enlightenment under Catherine the great, 18th century.
Cat was a lying whore desu. Just because she preached enlightenment doesn't mean she actually did much to support, her rule is notorious for strengthening serfdom, feudal rights and corruption through the roof.
If anything, she put Russia back by a couple centuries culturally.

you may not like it but this is what a true protagonist looks like

I think you just hate women. Every philosopher and artist sucked her dick.

I hate bad rulers.
>Every philosopher and artist sucked her dick.
>people detached from reality that she was endlessly showering in cash and gifts sucked her dick
>meanwhile treasury emptied, feudals got fat and peasants started a biggest rebellion yet because endless bullshit of her reign made life a living hell

>Every philosopher and artist sucked her dick.
That's not the main part. She brought administration and military up to date.
>meanwhile treasury emptied, feudals got fat and peasants started a biggest rebellion yet because endless bullshit of her reign made life a living hell
18th century wasn't about welfare for the underclass at all, and Enlightenment didn't mean egalitarianism.

>Enlightenment didn't mean egalitarianism
Enlightenment had a very specific set of ideals on which she either didn't follow through or took a huge shit during her reign despite praising them. That's an undeniable fact of her reign.

A-fucking-greed.

Literally traitor of slavs.

Go guzzle on some fermented kraut semen you love so much, mix it with hungarian urine while you're at it.

Name one instance where they were historically relevant.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Szigetvár

>the 16th century Ottoman Empire totally mustered 200,000 men to take one backwater Balkanshit fort and totally lost tens of thousands of men in the process despite this never being mentioned in their accounts, believe us.

this and poland is correct

in ww2 croatian communists won over croatian nazis, simple

dont start world wars if you dont want your lands occupied by people you oppress

now Danzig really ist Polnisch

...

No, it's a bad guy with a victim complex.
What's with poleboo fetishists in Veeky Forums anyway?

When did Poland do something that is considered bad exactly? Non-memery answer pls.
>inb4 exist lmao XDDDD so cool n edgy

ugh, how about the time they persecuted and executed 6 million innocent Germans at danzig? or when their jewish communist government declared war on Germany and promised to destory all aryans?

Define bad. Because they've had plenty of wars of aggression of their own. If you don't count that, they did nothing, but same goes for pretty much everyone else.

you forgot your image.

I mean like truly unjustify bad shit insane aggressive war like with a main intention to exterminate entire ethnic group and claim its land for itself.

Who did that, besides G*rmans?

Ceasar was a hero.

>pole fetishists
Are we even on the same board? Any thread about Poland gets sharted up by wehrboos, tankies and muh 1/64 german heritage amerimutts. Third world shitskins hate Poles for some reason as well.

Also elaborate on the bad guy part

>Are we even on the same board?
Doubt it. Any thread about Poland is just one big pole wank, full of polish diaspora and underaged /pol/shits sprouting "muh winged hussars" and "le based slavs memes. Poles have always been the aggressors, especially in the 20th century - from Czechoslovakia, Lithuania to Ukraine.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Ukrainian_War?wprov=sfla1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement?wprov=sfla1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Lithuanian_War?wprov=sfla1
>inb4 muh polish minorities
Even worse is the eternal polish victim complex.

I'm anything but a stormfag, but I wouldn't be surprised if the supposed Danzig massacres were actually true.

>Jews, Assyrians, Romans, Arabs, Spanish, Anglos, T*rks, Croats, Africans on Africans etc.
Kr*uts are overrated.

t.gzegorsz

Define Polish "freedom"

>Catholics shouldn't have rights to the lands of Kievan Rus

Brutal enslavement and racial policcies against Ukrainians

Sigismund III's invasion of Russia during the time of troubles in order to catholicize Russia

Polonization of Ukrainian and Belarussian lands

Invasion of Ukraine and Belarus in 1920 because of imperialist ambitions

Banning of Ukrainian and belarussian schools, closing of orthodox Chruches

>M-MUH POLISH FREEEEEEEEDOM
>b-but fug da ukranian and lithuanian freedoms, they wuz muh clay

Freedom from having a state.

Wew those butthurt eastern slavshits

Nah, just happy to rub it in your face that no Pan scum will be ruling LVoV(not Lwow) anytime soon.

Is Lvov a russian name for the city?

In the end it turned out very well, if not great :)

anything pro-pole gets swarmed with wehracucks and vatniks, pipe down

*Лвoв

>Invasion of Ukraine and Belarus in 1920 because of imperialist ambitions

Львoв or Львiв depending on if you whether you believe that Ukrainians are real or mythical unicorns.

BS. Vast majority in any Pole thread until recently in both his, int and pol consisted of these:
Entire western pop culture is based on glorifying Poland. Any anti-Polish responses are just a reaction of the cancer of poleaboos everywhere. So stop whining Anders

Pilsudski's dictatorship expressively crossed the Curzon line and fought against soviets, OUN and the Black Army in Belarus and Ukraine in order to restore the commonwealth.

in the end Poland take their clay from all of those.
only small cancer on north is still here but soon...

>Brutal enslavement and racial policcies
>racial policies
wat
also serfs were treated like shit no matter what if they were polish or lithuanian or whatever
>Sigismund III's invasion of Russia during the time of troubles in order to catholicize Russia
it was started by a bunch of nobles in ukraine, Poland wasn't officialy part of it until russia allied sweden and declared war on poland which gave king a reason to actually invade them
>Polonization of Ukrainian and Belarussian lands
i wish
actually, this never happened
polonization was only affecting elites and it was voluntarily process see: house of wiśniowiecki
>Invasion of Ukraine and Belarus in 1920 because of imperialist ambitions
you mean USSR, who actually planned to invade poland anyway as they wanted it to be a bridge to spread communism to countries like germany who struggled with revolutionists themselves
>Banning of Ukrainian and belarussian schools, closing of orthodox Chruches
this one is true though

> Good guys of history.

Top candidate;

youtube.com/watch?v=7vkYiCdn834

Poland: causing butthurt since 950 AD

Yeah.... soon...

Did you really got so triggered by this thread? That's pretty patethic honestly.

perspective opinion =/= objective fact

Well, at least unlike the Serbs, they never sided with the Turks.

you know shit
Pilsudski want to restore Belarus and Ukraine as a buffer states but people who live here don't give shit asaide few nationalist and they won't interface in this war, Poland alone couldn't wage war aganist whole Russia so nothing weird Pilsudzki has to give up that idea and let russians take most of those lands
ukraine people soon pay for their ignorancy in 1932-1933

>German clay
not German clay if all Germans were forcibly resettled :)

Nah, m8.
Just have some images from my Polish hate thread and post them here to bait some polacks :^)

Armenia
Pre-islam Persia
Hussite bohemia

>Curzon line
>Pilsudski
?
>bait
Implying you're not fucking retarded lmao. Just like majority of people ITT

Seems like it worked like a charm.

>make map in paint

woha such a bait chllout m8 im pretty sure this is gonna be in polish news tommorow

>Polen
>good guys
lol

Not an argument.

Ukrainians were considered an inferior race in the PLC, and The Ukraine was considered a type of Polish lebensraum. There are numerous tracts of polish nobles glorifying the subjugation of the Ukrainian savage. There is also 1 statue from the 17th century that portrays an Ukrainian and Negro holding the Polish throne.
>it was started by a bunch of nobles in ukraine, Poland wasn't officialy part of it until russia allied sweden and declared war on poland which gave king a reason to actually invade them
BS. The Swedes actually started a war on their own to grab Russian lands at the same time during the Polish invasion, the Ingrian war which concluded in the treaty of Stolbovo. The Russians lost that war fast due to not having enough manpower to spare since they were fighting the Poles. At first it was the intervention of a few Polish nobles in the Russian civil war where one of them was supported by the Bolyars to become the Tsar of Russia. He was supposed to also convert to Orthodoxy. However Sigismund III wanted entire Russia for himself in order to destroy Orthodoxy(it was a crusade in all but name)


>you mean USSR, who actually planned to invade poland anyway as they wanted it to be a bridge to spread communism to countries like germany who struggled with revolutionists themselves
Any definitive source? That sounds absolutely dubious considering Russia was in a civil war and had very little forces to spare fighting Poland. Also, the soviets barely supported the Finnish communists, what makes you think they were so inclined to support the german communists?

>polonization was only affecting elites and it was voluntarily process see: house of wiśniowiecki
Assimilation happens top down.

Also how do you think the 15% of belarussian population became catholic and the majority of Galicia became Uniate. Polonization created the Ukrainian(Ruthenian) and Belarussian languages. Before that they were dialects of Rus.

Literally the underdog of europe

Unironically China

>ukraine people soon pay for their ignorancy in 1932-1933
Vast majority of people affected by the famine(caused by environmental factors) were Russians, including in the Eastern Ukrainian region.

Sorry Anders, this isn't 1610. Also, Prussia was never majority Polish. You poles got a pretty sweet deal, getting half of east prussia and the industrialized western Poland, only losing east slavic land which was never majority Polish anyway. The Hungarians and Bulgarians lost far more of their ethnic land than you, but you don't see them whining about that as much as you.

>Ukrainians were considered an inferior race
>Ukraine was considered a type of Polish lebensraum
Wew, looks like kr*uts and p*les deserve each other...
Why can't they just genocide each other to the end?

Are you genuinely retarded? You expect someone to actually waste his time "refuting" your idiotic posts? How about you pick an actual history book instead of the bullshit that RT is feeding you,

Tell me at least ONE bad thing they did

>I don't have an argument so I'm gonna pretend I refuted you by saying you watch RT