Is this map an accurate representation of Finnish holdings?

Is this map an accurate representation of Finnish holdings?

No.

You forgot Northern Brazil

The Finns never held territory in North America, the Middle-East or Greenland. Note that their hold over southern Europe and Siberia was very thin, they had some military garrisons but almost no civilian population apart from the colony of Suomi Kreikka in what became Greece. There were no clear border zones.
Neither the Wewuzians, Sheids or Kangz were ever under foreign control and fought off any Finnish or Hwangook incursions into their territory. It is not known whether they feared the Melanoid warriors but the only known colonial holding in Africa was the Finnish starship port porn of Benin.
The "Designated Kingdom" is a myth, the area was held by tribal Neanderthals and the Lemurian Empire.
Most of the southeast Asian archipelago was held by the Emu Confederacy and the Hwan had constant border skirmishes in the Indochina area.

Most of North America was owned by either the First White American Empire or tribes of primitive hunter-gatherers. South America was divided between unknown civilizations and the isolationist state of First Israel.

>The Finns never held territory in North America

Pure revisionism. The FWAE were colonial backwaters LARPing as their finnish overlords and werent even independent until after the activation of the autism array in the hyperwar, and then they spent all their time and resources sperging out and genociding giants

You are assuming correlation exists between the activation of the Giza Array and the American Empire secessionism, when the secessionist sentiment was already high before the war and there were daily protests against the rule of Khagan Kekkonen XVI in Uusi Jorkki. When the war started the FWAE immediately declared their neutrality and expelled all Finnish and Hwangook diplomats. Just because Khagan Niinistö II granted them official recognition of independence in his autism trashings in the final days of the war does not mean they were not de facto independent for at least 700 years before.
You should also pay notice to the ethnic statistics of the FWAE; the Finnic colonists were vastly outnumbered by the citizens of the now defunct First Nations and the separatism sentiment reflected this. You cannot even find traces of Finnic genes in North America outside of Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota where the first Finnic colonists settled as it reminded them of the thousand lakes of their homeland.

The Emu Confederacy was a paper tiger, they were never the serious threat to the Hwans that people make them out to be.

It's easy to say that with hindsight, but back then no one knew their true capabilities.

>finns never holding any territory in north america and greenland
>resurgance under the 13th dynasty of karelians

Pick one and only one

I think this map was before the Emu Border War. Plus the Emus were never a threat. The Hwan left because they had to stop the Jomon incursions into Siberia. Sahul and Sunda weren't worth the trouble, since they brought in almost no taxes and the hobbits were terrible soldiers.