What was that website with all those medical studies and papers related to fitness that was used the most reliable...

Try some traditional medicine, meditation and vril next time faggot

what kind of diet works for you?

Pastoral diet with slightly upped grain intake pre and post-workout.

...

...

>Also research or studies on high-carb vs low-carb cutting diets. Confused as fuck about that shit.
there's a certain minimum amount of protein and fat you need. you adjust carbs based on your energy expenditure. not that difficult. if you do very low carb youre gonna have more fats but thats not gonna be optimal cause carbs are more useful for recovery and shit. if you do high carb youre not gonna get enough protein so your MPS will be lacking or your not gonna get enough fats so your hormone balance gets fucked up and shit.

i dont understand why you need studies about this

Do you live on a farm?

I just like to know that my lifestyle choices are based on legitimate and proven methods as opposed to broscience,personal anecdotes or sports nutrition shilling.

Is that so strange?

so what i just said means nothing just because it's not taken from a study?

No, but I hold chickens, a basic vegetable garden and source most of my shit from farms.

In a sense yes, even though you are most definitely using sound information (that looks suspiciously like it's based off of meme diet studies).

Our bodies vary in composition and our metabolisms may be in comparison faster or slower.
So what might work for you may not work for me.

Is it really that hard for Veeky Forums to deliver good research on their chosen diets?

There's very little research done on serious lifters (I know, serious lifters on Veeky Forums etc). The populations are usually too small and too uninterested in participation to get any good data.

...

That's pretty cool desu. What made you choose that diet?

>Our bodies vary in composition and our metabolisms may be in comparison faster or slower.
that only changes your tdee, not your macro composition

but yeah, there are other things that make people react differently to different diets, but how could any study take that into account?

read this, shut the fuck up and go back to /r/fitness
barbellmedicine.com/potpourri/584/

>but yeah, there are other things that make people react differently to different diets, but how could any study take that into account?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_control

Even though I thank you for providing. That article doesn't count as a reputable study. Just some coach advocating his own shit.

...

what i mean is that there is no useful way to categorize people depending on their metabolism and shit. its individual. someone could see better results with more carbs less fats compared to someone else but there's no way to generalize that so i dont see the point

i dont get why everything has to be based on a reputable study. especially when there are just about no studies on "low carb vs high carb" and shit. anecdotal evidence can be very sound too and cited studies can be shit.

fwiw, feigenbaum has done his research on the matter. if anyone, he's an anti-broscience guy. id recommend reading the protein book by lyle macdonald if youre after studies, the book has references to some 200 studies or so. other books by lyle are similar i think.