Krishna historical?

Was Krishna a historical person?
I need to know.

...

...

He was an Eastern European Aryan(noble) worshipped by Pajeets and raised to a rank of god.

Eastern European?
An Ukranian?

>Ukranian
No such thing.

He was a normal man, some religions might denote him to be a prophet of God. During the age of decadence within Hinduism, prior to the conception of Buddhism, the Hindu began to corrupt his teachings, and spread misinformation about his own faith. The Hindu associated partners with the Creator, raising the status of men to emulate God(s). Krishna, was a man. He came with a message, but the Hindu, through much alteration, went astray.

>krishna
>name literally means Darkie
>"He wuz polish and shheeit!"

>polish
Obsessed. I love how polacks trigger the shitskins on this board. You gave me a new larping idea, thanks.

>Euhemerism
>Aryan Krsna
>2017

Laughing lolibhava yoginis. png

someone redpill me on the connection between heracles and krishna

>y-you are obsessed with us.
Yeah the class clown is pretty popular.

Says the literal pajeet. People known only for smelling bad, shitting in the streets, harassing women both online and in real life and bathing with corpses in a river full of shit.

You truly showed me, subhuman.

whats wronging with the street shittings?

Apparently nothing when you're "Indian"

WE

>Was Krishna a historical person?
absolutely not, and the mahabharata has absolutely zero historical basis, not even the "it's based upon a much smaller war between the major states of iron age india"

The same thing may have happened to Jesus.

This meme

>Genetics linguistics and comparitive mythology are wrong because fuck ypipo
POO

It's bas enough if you believe this to soothe your ego, worse if you're actually this retarded.

I'm sure these are accurate translations and not taken out of context at all.

IN

WUZ

ARYANZ