White nationalism = Nazism

>Only the right believes in private property

Privatization in Nazi Germany was on a very small scale, and literally irrelevant compared to their efforts to centralize certain areas of the economy.

I mean, that's like saying Pinochet was a socialist because he re-nationalized copper mines. Retarded exaggeration.

>"show me one example of socialism working"

>"DA NOWDIC MAW-DOLL!"

socialism is a vague ideology that doesn't really mean anything other than "muh working man". Marxism, SocDems, Fascism, and most Nationalist ideologies branched out from it. Unfortunately today we only acknowledge Marxism as "true socialism".

>"white" as a quality of a person

>being anti immigration is white nationalism

>Nazism = Marxism

>blonde people exist
>"white" people don't
imagine being this stupid

‘no’

>hurr durr Nazis were left
You are the ultimate brainlet. Read this and be brought from your cretinous ignorance into the world of knowledge:
theleder.com/docs/Misc/Paxton_Five Stages of Fascism.pdf

>White Nationalism
>Nazism

>Me no want to see black people
>White people are oppressed

>White nationalism

Dafuq is even that thing supposed to be? Some retarded burger through whites are a nation?

...

Define ‘white.’ What groups are and aren’t ‘white’ and why? More importantly, why has ‘white’ historically included groups that now aren’t considered white, such as Mexican Hispanics, and didn’t include groups, like Southern Europeans and the Irish, who now are? Whiteness is a socially constructed category, not a real descriptor.

Mutts are the most hardcore LARPers

The word privatization was invented to describe their policies

Hitler literally said that he only included the word 'socialist' in his movement so that more people would join his side.

>BLAK PEPUL R JUS LIK YT PEPUL
>FUG OF RASISS

Blacks are just whites that don't get red when they get touched lmao

spencer memes always get me

>fascism is socialist
Why is this board overrun with idiots? It’s like everyone just stopped reading scholarship in ‘97 and missed all of the best work on fascism.

>race is real
discovermagazine.com/1994/nov/racewithoutcolor444

t.

That black individual is British, though. And isn't Spencer a mutt?

I'd be surprised if even 1% of the board has read the Doctrine of Fascism

I'd like to first say that I'm not a "white nationalist," and certainly not a "natsoc." I'm racist and want to live purely around other Anglos and Celts.
White means native Europeans, even Sicilians and Jews. But "whiteness" isn't the good side, opposed to "non-whiteness," it's just one of the categories of men. And some whites are who I want to live around, while some whites I don't want to live around. And I don't want to live around any non-whites.
But I would never publicly express these feelings. That'd just be stupid.
I think that most white men are racist. But most of them are also smart enough to know that it's a bad idea to express those feelings publicly. So only stupid white men end up becoming "white nationalists."

>hitler invented fascism

>t. marxist

Fascism is capitalism in decay, it doesn't have that much theory to it besides "gosh the old days were sooo much better"

I never said that, timmy

then your response was pointless

Yeah but it's important to understand the thought process and its patented design to steal votes from commies and socdems

>privatisation is "believing in private property"

>quoting Trotsky
someone get an icepick

No not really, Fascism dosnt have a lot of theory so it says literally anything to get people on its side, Hitler called his movement a "workers" movement for popularity only.

>Economic theory is decided by The Economist
>No one ever privatised a state owned asset until 1933

t. clueless wiki warrior who hasn’t read any academic work on fascism

Fascism has no nuance, dummy

>american political education

Rocco's Political Doctrine of Fascism > Mussolini's Doctrine of Fascism

define blonde people? White is just a phenotype that applies to most europeans.

>More importantly, why has ‘white’ historically included groups that now aren’t considered white, such as Mexican Hispanics, and didn’t include groups, like Southern Europeans and the Irish, who now are?
oh so you're just spouting bullshit now. In America those races had always been considered officially white, stop being a fucking idiot.

Nuance =/= complexity, you brain dead fool.
theleder.com/docs/Misc/Paxton_Five Stages of Fascism.pdf

>"academic" work on fascism is all written by marxist opponents of fascism
>they say fascism has nothing to do with socialism

Do you have a rule about only reading academic work produced after 1945 or something?

>Right wing Americans call everything non-liberal "socialism"
>Left wing Americans call everything non-liberal "fascism"

Did I cracked the code?

Basically yes

If you read Hitler's platform it's pretty obvious that it's points evolved from 19th century nationalism and socialist movements.

>Mexican Hispanic
Mexican is a nationality, Hispanic is a language. I think you meant MESTIZOS who aren't white because they have literal Amerindian blood, negro.

Fascist texts have as much to do with fascism as this post. Fascism is best understood as lacking any coherent ideology, pursuing any and every path to power in order to prevent the erosion of the traditional society by burgeoning left wing movements. This is why the allies of fascism are traditionally conservatives, who join with them to defeat the left electorally with the misguided belief that they are the ones who will control policy.

>Fascism = Nazism

did I say blonde hair = white? Being blonde is a phenotype that is obvious to most observers just like being white is. Of course there are people who are borderline "blonde" like pic related just as there are people who are borderline "white". To say that the existence of these darker "white" people disproves the existence of whiteness is to say that the existence of dirty blondes disproves the existence of blondes.

>socialists can’t be right-wingers

>Nazis are pan-white nationalist who tried to save all white people in europe

...

>nigger
>british
Hello, Abungadanbe al-Muhammad.

So are historians and political scientists brainlets, but (you), some random faggot on Veeky Forums, some sort of erudite in nazism?

1. If Fascists care so much about traditional society then why were they such proponents of futurism and secularism?

2. You're not even addressing my original post which said "Fascism branched out from early socialism". Mussolini tends to agree.

>POLITICAL AND SOCIAL DOCTRINE - EVOLUTION FROM SOCIALISM
>The only doctrine of which I had practical experience was that of socialism, from until the winter of 1914 - nearly a decade. My experience was that both of a follower and a leader but it was not doctrinal experience. My doctrine during that period had been the doctrine of action. A uniform, universally accepted doctrine of Socialism had not existed since 1905, when the revisionist movement, headed by Bernstein, arose in Germany, countered by the formation, in the see-saw of tendencies, of a left revolutionary movement which in Italy never quitted the field of phrases, whereas, in the case of Russian socialism, it became the prelude to Bolshevism.
>Reformism, revolutionism, centrism, the very echo of that terminology is dead, while in the great river of Fascism one can trace currents which had their source in Sorel, Peguy, Lagardelle of the Movement Socialists, and in the cohort of Italian syndicalist who from 1904 to 1914 brought a new note into the Italian socialist environment - previously emasculated and chloroformed by fornicating with Giolitti's party - a note sounded in Olivetti's Pagine Libere, Orano's Lupa, Enrico Leone's Divenirs Socials.
>When the war ended in 1919 Socialism, as a doctrine, was already dead; it continued to exist only as a grudge, especially in Italy where its only chance lay in inciting to reprisals against the men who had willed the war and who were to be made to pay for it.

Read Paxton’s article, which I’ve linked twice. It explains everything. I’m not going to sit here and summarize it for you, I can’t do it justice, it’s beautiful. It will explain why, for example, quoting Mussolini is pointless and almost everything he said or wrote prior to taking power is irrelevant. It will also explain how fascism is a fundamentally traditionalist movement.

didn't most socialist regimes cracked down on unions to create an union created by the parties? Didn't a lot of socialist countries purged other socialists for small differences?

*created an union controlled by the central party?

That's basically american politics :DDDD

>Duh KKK were protofascists!!!
Stopped reading there, he's literally regurgitating every Marxist talking point imaginable.

You're not providing any data to substantiate your claims. In reality, privatization accounted for like 1.4% of government revenue in the first five years of their rule.
Meanwhile, they directly or indirectly assumed control over most of German economy.
So fuck off with your "Hitler was economic libertarian" bullshit. It's amazing how you people keep trying to turn Hitler and Nazis into some American-style right-wingers.