Muh! brown people created civilization

Bullshit

wrong. eastern and central europe was white, western europe was "brown"

they weren't brown idiot, they where most likely med like sardinians.
and blonde hair and blue eyes are most closely linked with the I haplogroups and they have nothing to do with the Aryans.

Cucuteni–Trypillia wasn't any different from other typical Neolithic societies besides having larger settlements.

is that why the most blonde country in the world is N1c

specifically Haplogroup I-M253.

CT were l2a1, T, G

fins obviously don't get their light features from N1c otherwise Siberians would all be blonde retard.

>Cucuteni–Trypillia wasn't any different from other typical Neolithic societies besides having larger settlements.

they were before the turkic invasions though

>WE

Explain this OP

Consider yourself BTFO.

lol go show me reliefs and paintings from India or Iran that depict blonde blue eyed people. there are none, there are literally zero depictions of blondes outside of Europe from the Indus Valley region. Your whole fucking history is fake, Germanics and nords are breakaway groups from a larger migratory pattern that are tangentially related to the Steppe niggers. must be sad being so gay you have to twist both history and genomics to claim other people's history because you're embarrassed Germanics didn't become human until the Christians showed up

are you retarded? they are all R1A so they are Slavs not mongoloid Siberians.

beavers are the master race humans are niggers.

Das rite.

...

t. cultureless Amerimutt

Do not blame them for their ignorance. We will overcome.

they were Neolithic darkies. pre-Bronze Age Europe was middle eastern garbage. so what, they were geographically in Europe. so too will future britanistanis

Kys retard

Kys retard, whiteys are garbage

Wrong. Eastern and Central Europe was "always" white. It was West and South that was dark, also partially Scandinavia.

>Western hunter-gatherers (WHG) had a distinctive blue-eyed, dark skin pigmentation
phenotype1,2 that emerged in the Mesolithic.6 In contrast, we show that Mesolithic and
Neolithic individuals from Ukraine, Latvia and the Iron Gates had, like Scandinavian and
Eastern hunter-gatherers, intermediate to high frequencies of the derived skin pigmentation
allele at SLC24A5. Unlike Scandinavian and Eastern hunter-gatherers, however, they have
low frequency of the derived SLC45A2 allele. The derived OCA2/HERC2 allele associated
with light (particularly blue) eye color is common in WHG, SHG, and hunter-gatherers from Latvia, but at low frequency in hunter-gatherers from Ukraine and the Iron Gates. This allele appears to be differentiated in a North-South gradient, as it is today – suggesting the possibility of long-term balancing selection due to geographic variation in selective pressure.

>The WHG phenotype of light eye and dark skin pigmentation1 thus appears to be restricted to western Europe and is far from universal in European hunter-gatherers, with light skinpigmentation common in Northern and Eastern Europe before the appearance of agriculture."
It's just West Euros being shitskins. The cycle is completing itself.

its interesting how uniform these are without a big home for the chief the illustrations anyway

I don't think their society functioned that way, they where more egalitarian.

Neolithic Greece

Neolithic Sardinia

Neolithic Malta

Stone balls from Neolithic Scotland

Based non-Indo-European civilization

Why is Veeky Forums is so absurdly contrarian?
>/pol/ loves Nazi Germany
>fuck all Germans, they always destroy civilization
>some retarded nordicists appear on Veeky Forums
>fuck indo-european steppe niggers, they ruined Europe

Neolithic Orkney

House from neolithic Orkney

Thessaly, 6th millenium bc

They look brown to me.

Based non-Indo-European civilizations

They were all the same.
They clustered with Sardinians, with varying degrees of WHG admixture.

Wrong.

"Western hunter-gatherers (WHG) had a distinctive blue-eyed, dark skin pigmentation
phenotype1,2 that emerged in the Mesolithic.6 In contrast, we show that Mesolithic and
Neolithic individuals from Ukraine, Latvia and the Iron Gates had, like Scandinavian and
Eastern hunter-gatherers, intermediate to high frequencies of the derived skin pigmentation
allele at SLC24A5. Unlike Scandinavian and Eastern hunter-gatherers, however, they have
low frequency of the derived SLC45A2 allele. The derived OCA2/HERC2 allele associated
with light (particularly blue) eye color is common in WHG, SHG, and hunter-gatherers from
Latvia, but at low frequency in hunter-gatherers from Ukraine and the Iron Gates. This allele
appears to be differentiated in a North-South gradient, as it is today – suggesting the
possibility of long-term balancing selection due to geographic variation in selective pressure.
The WHG phenotype of light eye and dark skin pigmentation1 thus appears to be restricted to
western Europe and is far from universal in European hunter-gatherers, with light skin
pigmentation common in Northern and Eastern Europe before the appearance of agriculture."

tldr: Eastern Europeans were always whiter than Western Europeans.

Sardinians have more WHG than Cucuteni, Cucuteni had next to no EHG admixture on average and only minimal WHG admixture

Scandinavian HGs were heavily mixed with EHG who moved there from Russia after the ice age.

There was no EHG in Polish or German hunters or farmers so the attempt to disassociate them from WHG and Neolithic farmers doesn't work. They are in the same group.

The WHG/EHG boundary/mixed area went through central Ukraine, Belarus, Latvia and Scandinavia.

But those people were brown, retard, just because they were in what is today calle europe doesnt mean they were pale with light features

Fucking her kill yourself you imbecile piece of shit

A thread died for this

# # # #

This is the state of Veeky Forums

And i want to know, what the fuck is white?

Yeah so brown

People not really invested in archaeology but inclined to name-drop archaeological cultures are the worst.

Blond to brown hair, pale skin, strong Caucasoid skull features.
To me that is.

Cucuteni–Trypillia were black, this fact got whitewashed by wypipo in 1945

THICC

Might as well call Gobleki Tepe the first civilization then.

Well they were more related to South Europeans than to modern Near Easterners

There's no DNA from GT. We know that there was a genetic boundary between Natufian and WHG related components in Western Anatolia and CHG(Caucasus) components in the east.

GT happens to be located pretty far to the southeast. Based on that it seems likely they would have been similar to Georgians or pre-BA Levantines.

>that
>civilization
okay savage

> Based on that it seems likely they would have been similar to Georgians or pre-BA Levantines.

What?

To Georgians?

They were in South Central Anatolia during the 8th millenium bc, they still were not mixed with CHG like people

>GT

Oh ok you're talking about Gobekli tepe, they didn't even farm, let alone have cities, I thought you were talking about Catal hoyuk, never mind then

>muh glorified mud huts

Oh you brainlet

So sardinia hasnt experienced migration?

That is a germanic
Pathetic germanic just want history