When did they become unconquerable?

When did they become unconquerable?

Since They conquered that island. If you think coldly about it, the brits have never faced a danger, they have fought wars against other nations but that is it.

Better yet, when did they stop being unconquerable?

>it's own fucking ex-colony turns them into a vassal
The absolute state

> the brits have never faced a danger

In brits you mean the UK as a whole I assume. Because England has faced many threats, the Norskis, the Danes, The Scots, the sheep fucking Welsh, The French, the french the french...

Once they had a united island even then the Spanish almost landed and if they had, those sweet fair brunettes with pink nipples wouldve been gnawed on by Juan Mohamed

>the ex-colony broke away from the """tyrannical""" empire, only to become a vassal of israel

>Benjamin Disraeli

>Israeli

hmmm

>lost empire 80 years ago
>hasn't done anything of note since
>is US's cock sleeve
>"w-we wuz kangz"
You would have been spared this date if you stayed in the EU. Now you're just an American puppet

...

>the EU
>not just another globalist puppet master
Kek

You could have chosen to stay in the EU and join your European brothers in cultural paradise, but instead you left and became a lap dog for the burgers. Once again germany gave you the option to be free, yet you refused. Truly Sad.

>hasn't done anything of note since
>sends this over the web

>cultural paradise

I cant wait until whites are killed off en masse in their own homelands.

Fuck off, shlomo

Waterloo

Trafalgar actually.

Probably in about 1500 when the Tudors sent the entire economy on the navy.

Anglo-dutch wars were also a pretty good precursor of what was up.

Indeed. Ive been forming hypothesis that Russia and Northern state and Canada will be the last hold out of any true original whiteness.

It basically goes like this
>Europe and America are overrun by race mixing, dominated by ME and Indian immigrants gaining momentum in 2020's. (If you think its bad now, just wait.)
>assimilation in America to the coastal cities starts fast but loses influence as more and more move in.
>urban blacks get cucked out of existance by 2050 in the US.
>By this time 2/3 generations have now lived in America and will start curiously moving out of Urban centers finding haven in the rural reaches of Connecticut, Newyork, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. Some with settle, others will be able to buy multiple homes as part of vacation sites.
>by 2065 urban centers in the American East coast from Wasington to Boston have now completely displaced people of European decent in all positions of society.
>cities in the southern shore line and inland such as st louis, Baltimore, Atlanta, even as far as Houston Texas have undergown a agricultural revolution. Where these cities are booming with green blocks, or in other words plantation skyscrapers.
>the south with be the argicultural and energy powerhouse of the United States, incorporating the Mississippi River for hydro power as its use for travel will become increasingly limited.
>suburban develop will be cast upon the entirety of rural Virgina, Carolinas, and Georgia as its vast land will be capable of housing some billion residence by 2100.

Meanwhile in the West
>race mixing between East Asian and Latin American will be the dominating peoples with the European ancestral americans acting as the bridge between the two.
>the west will decline severely as the East and South southwest boom.
>there will be pockets of whites left in rural undeveloped areas such as Lousiana, Alabama, Arizona, Missouri and middle america states as well as Colorado, New Hampshire and Montana.

No No No!

England was invaded by the Romans, Saxons, Vikings, French (Normans), The Dutch, and the Germans.

They are not unconquerable, they have been invaded many times, and more than most.

Right, but it seems to be that as soon as they centralized their power, the likes of Europe could not succesfully invade.
Meanwhile, Poland is invaded, the HRE is invaded, France, Italy multiple times, Austria, all succesfully at one point or another while Britain was never conquered from the high middle ages on.

Had napoleon's fleet won at trafalgar, they would have been invaded. Only afterwards was it not a possibility anymore.
And trafalgar hinged on luck and commanders more than each nation's capabilities.

1067

>muslim mayor of londons whos telling other muslims not to integrate
>constant terrorist attacks that are "part and parcel" of living there
>muhammed is the most popular name for babies
>projected that actual british people will be a minority in their own country by 2040
>muslim rape gangs that prey on children
>state funded media does nothing but shill this as all something good
>noticing that multiculturalism on the internet is illegal, and you will be arrested for a "hate crime"

lol

It really wasn't luck.

Luck always plays a part, but the British victory at Trafalgar was too decisive to be put down to luck alone.

Geography and luck, mostly

>More than most.
The English are those Saxon/Vikings, the Normans are the only people who conquered them, William III was literally invited over, as were the Hanoverians and they were both emasculated of any real influence immediately by parliament.
So that's literally once in all of history?
More than most?
The British have invaded most countries more than once in the last few hundred years so that literally can not be true.

1067