The natives are just sava-

Teach your children to not go near the edge of the cliff by throwing wife off of it to her death.

>throwing wife off of it to her death
KEK LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Wasn't it inhabited just 50 years or something?

They eventually lost to bunch of Spaniards. That's all, They were worthless untermensches.

Wrong. The diseases destroyed their civilization. Spaniards didn't even fight against them, only on certain ocasions, when most of them were already suffering epidemics and spaniards were allied with the winner side of the inca civil war.

I'll just leave this here.
youtube.com/watch?v=AZXjB5E7Gqg

Are jungles too shitty to build civilizations on non elevated ground?

The Inca lost to the Spanish in the same way that Imperial Germany lost to America

In both cases they delivered the coup de grace to an already crippled enemy

There's a difference between being technologically inferior and a savage. Monotheism is organized barbarism. That doesn't necessarily mean conquest of technologically inferior cultures isn't good, but we've had savages doing it for the last ~1500 years, not civilized peoples.

youtube.com/watch?v=-11fCgBp9QA

By your logic pic related is a slaughterhouse

could you really not choose any other city then the actual slaughterhouse chicago?

Retarded video.

Actually Amerindians had a higher development rate compared to europeans. How is this hard to get?

can you please go redpill this guy? #p83283975

>development rate
Out of curiosity how are you defining this?

like a videogame tech tree

Ahh

>Only the smartest children survive

Not true.
The Spaniards got into a 1:200 fight almost immediatly and kicked their arses.

these structures were either made by the original white inhabitants of the americas, or by the indians but at the direction of their white ruling class.

>europeans:
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to solutrean:10000 years (30000BC-20000BC)
>from aurignacian-antelian to neolithic: 15000 years(30000BC-15000BC)
>from neolithic proto-agriculture societies to neolithic revolution: 6000 years (15000BC-9000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to copper and arsenical bronze: 4000 years (9000BC-5000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to bronze age and tin bronze: 5200 years (9000BC-3800BC)

>Amerindians:
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to clovis: 4000 years (15000BC-11000BC)
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to the start of crop development: 7000 years (15000BC-8000BC)
>from neolithic proto-agriculture societies to neolithic revolution: 5000 years (8000BC-3000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to copper and arsenical bronze independently: 2000 years (3000BC-1000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to bronze age and tin bronze: 4000 years (3000BC-1000 AD)
Amerindians had a higher development rate compared to europeans. In other words, Amerindians had more civilization potential than europeans.

Wrong. Each progressive change from history lead to its consequences. Such consequences follow an order. Microlith industry following proto-crop based diets, population density increasement revolutioning social hierarchy, task specialization as a consequence of population density and agrarian life making it effective the optimization of methods, etc...

Spaniards didn't fight a battle against Incas, except when the civil war was over in 1570 and those battles were even mostly fought by other indians, when Spain already sent reinforcements and more people.

Try again. Amerindians had a higher development rate compared to europeans. In other words, Amerindians have more civilization potential than europeans. How is this hard to get?

>-ges

FTFY.
>oh they piled some rocks on top of one another? D'aww, the little monkeys think they're people!

All humans had the exact same starting point

Natives did pretty well despite being far less developed civilizations.
Pic related, mapuches kicked spaniard asses for over 300 years. Too bad they turn into drunktards and then everything went to shit.

Nope.
Amerindians started existing in 25000BC
Europeans started existing in 40000BC

That's the minimum frame of reference.

Amerindians had a higher development rate compared to europeans.

Blue eyes only exist since 5000BC you shitskin retard. That's the starting point of the white race.

Then comparing the immigrants with blue eyes from 5000BC who adopted agrarian lifestyle from MENA civilizations, then:Amerindians demonstrated a higher development rate too.

Try again, monkey.

>MENA
>civilizations
Like what? Sumerians were mostly Nordic.

Amerindians were wiping their asses with their bare hands and bashing rocks against one another to create fire for tens of thousands of years until whites taught them how to do it properly.

Assuming you refer to mesopotamians from 6500BC then let's compare:As the comparison mentions MENA influences, agrarian lifestyle was inherited from past MENA civilizations.

Amerindians demonstrated a higher development rate too.

Try again, monkey.

I wonder how many natives died trying to build that.

>muh shitskin empires
Blow it out your ass, whites INVENTED civilization. They were literally the first.

>Sumerians were mostly Nordic.
Nice meme Varg

There is a chronicle that mentions there were certain deaths. But it's known that every person contributed as a "tax" and worked for the state moving blocks and building bridges/communal structures in general. Some engineers were semi-priviledged, and artisans could become part of the priviledged class too.

>EUUGH DUOO WE WUZ CIVILIZATION
i bet your american

Western eurasian civilization started on the ME.

According to the jugdement of Caral being South America's craddle of civilization:

The first evidence of urban planning coincides with the neolithic revolution. Jericho is an example of communal work which needed a complex hierarchy system. The plannification and city shows that it's one of the craddles f civilization. The communal structures and planning are from 9500BC.

Caral follows the same process. The neolithic revolution in 3500 coincides with the foundation of Caral and it shows the earliest communal works and urban planning of South-America.

No but you literally are.
>inb4 b-but not the USA
All of that continent is shit, from Alaska to Chile.

ya bro europe number one

Yep.