IIT: We describe historical figures using CK II trait system

>Enrico Dandolo

>Blind
>Ambitious
>Diligent
>Humble
>Authoritative
>Greedy
>Trickster
>Ruthless
>Sympathy for Jews
>Quick
>Trained Fighter

>Midas Touched

You can actually play as him there

I'd play as the Byzantines just to capture and castrate him.

Forgot to put Crusader.

"""""Crusader"""""

>Joan of Arc
>Attractive (Maybe?)
>Celibate
>Zealous
>Brave
>Chaste
>Diligint
>Peasant Leader
>Trained Fighter
>Inspiring Leader
>Siege Leader

>Skilled Tactician

She's a qt in that pic, that's for sure.

>Maria Romanova

>Attractive
>Kind
>Temperate
>Charitable
>Dilligent
>Humble
>Shy
>Trusting

>Naive appeaser

Don't make me cry, please.

>Charles II of Spain
>Imbecile
>Ugly
>Deformed
>Absentminded
>Sickly
>Infertile
>Abomination born out of incest

>King Frederick II the Great

>Homosexual

>t. Casimir Polinski

>Attractive
>Diligent
>Patient
>Trusting
>Kind
>Lustful
>Poet
>Pregnant

>Elusive Shadow

t. Buttmad Greek

>Lustful

Not gonna lie I almost spat out my drink with laughter when I read it just casually thrown in the middle of the list.

>Adolf Hitler
>Genius
>Attractive
>Strong
>Tall
>Brave
>Kind
>Just
>Gregarious
>Formidable Fighter
>Inspiring Leader

>Brilliant Strategist

...

Actual traits in-game, as the character.txt:
>grey eminence (fair, considering his long diplomatic career)
>cynical (also fair)
>wroth (unjustified, cruel would have been better)
>blinded (meh, he was blind but he didn't get blinded)
>crusader (kek, although you could argue for it as he supposedly took part in the siege of Tyre of 1124 too)

>posting a bait image in response to an obvious joke post

>cruel would have been better
I don't think so. Cruel should be held only for Sadistic characters, or characters that engaged in torture. Enrico Dandolo was brutal in a Tywin Lannister-esque way. He was Ruthless, but not to the point of Sadism.

Too bad that ruthless isn't an actual trait. I mentioned cruel as a better option than wroth, which makes little sense, but if the game's acception of cruel is sadist rather than ruthless, perhaps it would be better to just skip that facet of his personality outright.
Unless they wanted to give him a higher martial skill. In that case a better choice would have been brave or strategist, considering his long military career and penchant to both make battle plans and wade into battle. Maybe even strong, considering the bugger did in fact last a fucking century of life in the 12th century. That sure warrants a high health attribute as well.

>>Pregnant

>attractive
>diligent
>envious
>deceitful
>craven
>gregarious
>ambitious
>paranoid
>creul

>intricate webweaver

Stalin was a psychopath, and psychopaths feel no fear. He wasn't especially brave but he wasn't craven, either.

>craven
Not even one bit close. Stalin was many things, but coward wasn't one of them.

Pretty sure whoever painted that modelled it on a generic 1920s lady because that’s contemporary to when celebration Joan of Arc was most popular in France.

Stop this shitposting

This whole thing made me laugh but at attractive I burst out uncontrollably

He sure was attractive, mmm

I was basing it on how in the first 5 days of war he ran away to his dacha to cry about how stupid he had been

>attractive
>strategist
>dilligent
>inspiring leader
>mujahid

That's because he was batshit insane and paranoid about someone coming to take his head.

>Roman von Ungern-Sternberg:

>Skilled Tactician
>Mystic
>Scarred
>Skilled Fighter
>Adventurer
>Vajrayana Buddhist
>Sympathy for Christendom
>Temperate
>Diligent
>Wroth
>Ambitious
>Cruel
>Stressed

You forgot cynical