LINK: Seriously - $100?

Will I make it with 400

I BOUGHT THE FUCKING TOP WTFFFFF PLEASE TELL ME IM GOING TO MAKE IT FUUUUU

We are witnessing the Great Shakeout of non believers, 10,500 satoshis by eod

moon

10k by 2019

$50,000 per LINK by Q1 2018

it will absorb MasterCard and Visa's marketcaps

The price of gold will never increase, just look at its market cap.

^^That's you. That's what you sound like.

sure. you wont even have a decent wallet by Q1 noob

> tfw you saw the enormous pump but couldn't cash out because the library wifi didnt work for my laptop
Ah...
Guess I'll be holding these bags now

please explain to us why they needed to raise 32 MILLIONS$ and what they intent to do with it.

If you invested in this shitcoin and cant answer this question you a retard

Whale manipulation

This. It will shoot up to $5

>you wont even have a decent wallet by Q1 noob
These are the people that FUD LINK.

did you check your shitcoin roadmap? oh sorry you dont even have ONE LOOOOOOOL even shit obsidian has one

>what they intend to do with it
Hire developers, hire business development officers, hire marketing staff, outsource marketing services, buy an office space, pay for legal services, hire general managers to run the business whilst they focus on business development, add reputation value, pay for their time to do so and provide an amount of cash sufficient to keep a business alive for years to come

Does that answer your question?

>velopers, hire business development officers, hire marketing staff, outsource marketing services, buy an office space, pay for legal services, hire general managers to run the business whilst they focus on business development, add reputation value, pay for their time to do so and provide an amount of cash sufficient to keep a business alive for years to come
>Does that answer your question?
>[Post a Reply][Return] [Catalog] [Top] 24 / 2 / 18 / 1 [Update] [Auto]

ok so based on their inexistant whitepaper you bet that in ten years they will release something that might solve a problem and not dump all their coins to get short term profit?

Id rather go gamble color in a casino

Roadmaps are for incomplete projects.

>inexistent whitepaper

Stopped reading there. I've read every word of the whitepaper. Don't fucking invest, find the nearest doorknob and attempt to swallow it you fucking absolute walnut.

>their inexistant whitepaper
That meme is from a few months ago, friend. You have to stay up to date if you want to FUD.

>few months ago, friend. You have to stay up to d
go look at a real wallpaper and compare it to your 2page gay paper done in 2hours

who the fuck needs a dedicated wallet,jesus. you faggots need a specially tailored faggot suit for every one of your little faggot coins.
Just store it in metamask.

it's around 36 pages

peer reviewed boyo

how would they dump million of coins without crashing the market? do you even math bro

It's literally the best whitepaper I've read in this shitcoin market

They will ise the tech sithout oayingthe price
Why do you thinm any kf those scenarios would want to pay everytime they need "an oracle"

Let's do this:
If any of you can explain to me what the "oracle problem" is I'll buy 250k worth of link

To the whales keeping this down, I hope your children burn in a vicious fire.

larp

They are not doing it intentionally. They are just dumb and following emotions like most plebs here.

>JUST INVEST IN OMG

holy shit, people still talk about that shitcoin? how's the road down to $6 treating you? By year end you'll have a lower marketcap than walton lmao

>What is parity?

So I finally got one of my primary concerns about LINK tokens cleared up.
>What makes smartcontract.com not just make an independent oracle API and tokens for another blockchain if etherum should lose its position as the market leader? So we would be left bagholding worthless ERC20 LINK tokens while smartcontract.com still flourishes with the same concept and tech on a new platform.
Pic related for answer, the Oracles will be able to communicate with other blockchains, who will be forced to swap into LINK tokens for the data.

Yes they are, and I sincerely hope nothing but pain and misery to their families.

Can't catch a fucking break ever with these parasites. Fuck them and their children. All the news is positive and they still hold it back.

Why are they holding it back tho?

buy back in at a cheaper price probably

They post on here sometimes and laugh at us. They're vermin.

conference is starting now folks

Time zones. It's been over for several hours.

Do you enjoy trying to push 45 cents and seeing it go back down and go back up and go back down?

Thanks for your money.

oh shit

Keep building that negative karma asshole. You're going to get burned eventually.

What negative karma? This is a zero sum game, any gains you make will be off the back of some poor sod.

Depends when they got in. You are just holding back a moon for no fucking reason. Let it fly you piece of shit. We all stand to gain.

I'll give you one reason, it would allow me to retire and it's not gonna fucking happen since I'm cursed into wagecucking till I die
sorry I spoiled the Link potential for you guys

This, it also has the potential to fly higher than the shit 10 cent gains up and down

Seriously, ChainLink is bigger than everyone thinks, even still, even after SIBOS, the next big conference, you name it. Companies WANT to take advantage of smart contracts. They've been wanting this for years.
Freaking out because there's no news from Sergey is ridiculous. He's doing EXACTLY what he needs to be doing right now: putting his product in front of companies that are interested in utilizing smart contracts. The average crypto-investor (that's us, like it or not) is not his targeted audience, and honestly, hyping up a coin would probably look shady to the companies that he is interested in bringing on-board to the ChainLink network.
So don't expect a ton of news. Don't expect any hype from the team. But don't assume that's a bad thing, because in reality, it's going to help the long-term growth of ChainLink.

It makes me tons of money until someone tries to buy out what I am playing with, then I still have a massive stack and everyone wins.

Until then feeding on weak hands and having people buy at ATH is more profitable

Higher range means more interest from other whales, which means the volatility will increase over time. You are only holding yourself back from making more on a wider range at higher levels. You wont make much from these weak hands and tiny volume.

Question:
A success of LINK would also raise the value of ETH as only crypto to use to pay for contracts?
Could a success of LINK also make eth raise above BTC?

>
in the long term success of Link will boost the entire crypto market up. It's gonna cause the adoption that everyone is awaiting

That is reassuring. Then again it's coming from a PR

>Complexity, competition and adoption The code is simple as fuck, a team of 5 of google's less experienced programmers could learn blockchain and develop a better chainlink for less than 1% of link's marketcap. It's why the skele said it was overvalued in the first place, the idea is indeed great but the code is retardedly simple.

>There's no guarantee, before or after sibos, that ChainLink will be the best, cheapest option when the time does come for oracles to be useful

Fucking deluded linkies

because its fucking garbage lol just look at how hard it tanked after your "conference", went from 9k to 6k yet people are happy about a dead cat bounce back to 7k, linkies are so sad holy shit i shed a tear for you sad fags

Why would anyone actually use Chainlink if it was so expensive?

I have 70 link, will I make it fellow goyim ?

because it won't be when you're paying node operators fractions of a LINK token fool

Finally somebody sane here. Also wtf do you believe big companies will actually buy your shitcoins for 100x instead of making their own? Are you unironically retarded, linklets?

>The price of gold will never increase

The price of gold isn't increasing despite the supply side tapering.

Because 18 decimals.

What the fuck is happening is it going to 0 or moon

...

Still no news on the presentation today? They need to hire a secretary or something. Must have gotten enough money for that from the ICO.

Is it more likely people will be actually able to hold LINK for another 2 years, or will they dump it for the next flavor of the month?

...

My God you are retarded

NAH much closer to the moon few BIGGER Whales accumulate and we head for the alpha centauri 2-10$

>wtf do you believe big companies will actually buy your shitcoins for 100x instead of making their own?
would you answer this please?

Do NEO next.

Not for now

Do you even know what the purpose of an oracle is?

18 decimal places, and also if they were to create their own decentralized oracle network they would still have to pay fees, thats how decentralized networks are incentivized. I swear most of you faggots on this board just got into crypto this summer

compare the use of DGB and Link mate

your gonna need at least 5k to kinda of make it . but it's okay i only have a hundred shares so i know your pain

I know. I'm jelly with all the people who have 20k :/

ETH will be pushed hard by its Dapp, it's a pendulum, right now it's dragged down but once you will begin to see the applications then the flippening willl happen.

they think Sergey has spent the last 3-4 years without figuring out the most basic principles,
lmao at those retards thinking they jut outsmarted everyone

so in short, us newbies who got into crypto trading not too long (a week) ago , have about a couple years to catch on to the whales before BTC is 9 - 10k, Eth is 2 - 3k, LTC is 500 - 1k, and is LINK is double what LTC is now.

am i in the ballpark with those guestimations?

Yeah, but they can avoid buying it from you and create the private blockchain network within banks. And this is what they basically will do.

The absolute state of this board

>LTC is 500 - 1k

Do you actually believe banks won't be able to set up oracles for themselves?

*by themselves

They wont be buying LINK off node operators though will they? And if they have a private blockchain between banks, so what? In order for it to receive external data, they would need an oracle, which is why they want to use chain link. Jesus Christ. Read the fucking whitepaper

They are doing exactly this, but bankers aren't techies, so they are getting techies to do it for them, aka Sergey + Steve

Okay, now, before you shout MUH ORACLE one more time, think about this:

The Oracles send data from sources. These external sources are -often- institutions, such as SWIFT and Standard and Poors. There are other less-institutionalized examples of oracles, but I would expect that on a volume basis, the majority of the use of oracles are transmitting data from within financial institutions.

This isn't a situation like OMG where your fundamental customers are everyday people. This is a situation where the oracles are sending data from within an entity. Now, the transmission of the data and the execution of the transmission should be decentralized, great.

But why wouldn't a consortium of banks or financial reporting agencies simply decide to create their own oracle network rather than involve some kid?

These institutions are already facing looming obsolescence.

Why would they outsource the very reporting of the only thing that makes them relevant - some quasi-trust factor to deliver accurate financial information.

There's no reason these institutions wouldn't create an Oracle-Ripple and use it to maintain some relevance in the blockchain era.

The idea that some kid with some code is going to come in and throw a toll booth that 4channers own on top of SWIFT communication protocols is the greatest example of delusion I have seen on this board yet.

EYB
(enjoy your bags)

>muh they could just make their own oracle
>muh supercomputes on each city

the issue is the manipulation from having it just on Edelta and on Binnace. Just wait motherfuckers. Once more exchanges are adopted, this. shit. is. mooning. hard. its literally the only thing holding it back right now

what are patents?

>But why wouldn't a consortium of banks or financial reporting agencies simply decide to create their own oracle network rather than involve some kid?

“Hey guys lets spend a bunch of time and money developing a cost savings solution that has already been developed”

Yeah that’ll go over well

>there's an enormous value add of totally decentralizing the execution of data that comes from a centralized source anyway, so let's let some random kid render our communications obsolete instead of creating our own inter-institutional network a la Ripple where it's quasi centralized in some murky way but people largely don't care because they're relying on us for data anyway
Do you even think about the mechanics of things you invest in