If Romans conquered America, What would childrens of Romans and Natives look like?

They'd be black, just like the Native Americans were, what a silly question

This. The world would be much cooler.

Italian Mestizos>Spic Mestizos>Amerimutt 10% cherokee mestizos

They couldn't have conquered it but if they traded here it would have been pretty cool. probably would colonize some Taino or Arawak parts and have amazing cultural impact on both sides. Maybe even the asstechs would colonize africa or something. And smallpox wasn't so prevalent I think so immunization to old world disease would have lightened impact. Not to mention maybe Rome would be strengthened by extra resources which they couldn't get from the far east.

>Rome never falls
> Mesoamerica never falls
>tfw NON PLVS VLTRA doomed the world to christianity and "latin" america

This

Latin America was colonized by Romans. Spain and Portugal were continuation of the Romans.

t. colonial Latin America classes and books fag.

germanic-celtic moors who were christian fanatics are. NOT . FUCKING. ROMAN.

Yes, the Spanish Empire was a continuation numbnuts. Brutal colonization with destroying native culture, resource grabbing, and the like is the same way.

The Moorish/Germanic influence is no different than the Romans taking cultural influence from client states. If you really want to be retarded, you should remember Rome had Iberia for over 600 years and the fucking name LATIN America.

get learned on your Colonial Latin America history.

>tfw you will never see Romanized-Hellenized Olmecs and later Inca

tomato flavoured garum.

Wrong. They are Iberian.

In all honesty. They are bad hombres. Even the shortest in that list could kill a bitch like you.

Spanish colonization is really similar to Roman colonization. Conquer land,extract resources,romanization/hispanization and lots of civil projects like building towns and the likd

Terrance McKenna lays it all out in this vid:

"Greco-Mayan postmodern star-faring civilization"

youtube.com/watch?v=YSticX_UYDU

>"As time passed, and engineering advances occurred, by around 850 they had ships that were able to cross the Atlantic Ocean. And they encountered the Mayan civilization reaching its fullest flower in Guatemala and in the Yucatan peninsula. In fact, in this vision I saw the Roman Emperor Cosmodorus the Fifth make a pilgrimage to Tikal in 920 to be present at the coronation of a king at the end of Baktun 8. Anyway, this Greco-Roman imperial culture immediately recognized the genius of the Mayans in mathematics and astronomy, and Europe was… transformed, into an amalgamation, a Greco-Mayan civilization, and this civilization continued to develop.

>Now one of the influences which the Mayans brought into Europe around the year 950 was their extremely sophisticated psychopharmacopeia, and shamanism. And this mated with Neoplatonism and Hermeticism, so that rather than science developing as it developed in our world, a kind of magical, psychopharmacolytic technology of thought and understanding was what was developed over the centuries. And in later centuries, centuries before it happened in our world, they contacted the Orient, and the dynastic influence of the Sung poured itself into the creation of a global civilization. Such that, by around 1200 AD they were able to land on the moon, and create a cybernetic global civilization similar to the kind we have now.

>They continued evolving, with all this psychotronic and shamanically-derived… well, by now you can imagine it was an unbelievably exotic and alien civilization compared to our own...."

Can you name one thing they had which was culturally or politically romanesque?
>ywn see Americanized romans and later hellistines
> no statue to Quetzalcoatl in the Mayan neighborhood of Rome

Romanization was much much less thorough than Hispanization

>ywn view a human sacrifice and gladiator game on the same day
>on the moon

Define Roman

"Romanization was much much less thorough than Hispanization"

This is partial.

You are viewing History focused in North-Centre Europe who were considered frontiers and not mainly territories. For this reason romanization were lees thorough. You can see this difference even in Iberian Peninsula. Curiously less romanizated and christianizated people from the north started the "Reconquista".

Some Mediterranean territories were very romanizated. Even some emperors from Andalusia ruled the empire in 70 a.C.

Hispanization was strongly furthered by Spanish crown and focused in Andes and Mexico (were they found civilizations with a very important social estructure). In other areas prehistoric or nomads were converted directly to hispanic way of life. Even zones as Paraguay was totally secondary and Church did the work that state didn´t.

Maybe the big difference between romanization and Hispanization was that the seconds were totally focused to impose his religion. Saving souls was as important so take gold for the crown.

you called?

The overal structure was similar, grid pattern colonies with a central space and all important buildings in it, a system of indentured service and hierarchy, a flimsy but defined legal framework for duties and rights, a robust bureaucracy and military service, etc.

I agree with you but you are summarizing common features of many empires.

Followings empires didn´t promote mixed races or mestizaje. It could be another coincidence with roman empire.