What's the most powerful alliance the world has ever known?

What's the most powerful alliance the world has ever known?

Other urls found in this thread:

economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21723133-brazil-russia-india-and-china-have-done-even-better-forecastthanks-mainly
youtube.com/watch?v=yTdrmvmeRKo
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/China–India_relations
twitter.com/AnonBabble

The First Triumvirate

>China is taller than all other BRICS

Depends, do you consider NATO an alliance or just a bunch of puppet states?

1. FVEY (>good)
2. EU (>good)
3. BRICS
4. OIC

The Baltic Entente

holy league of 17 century

...

Too true.

lol at south africa being there
affirmative action

Reason alone for china to want to fuck over the rest of the world

Imagine how we burgers would be if something like this happened

Warsaw Pact.

Unironically, the Forman Entente.

can i get quick rundown on why did so many nations gang on china

I bet Jinping gets a hard-on thinking about having the pretext to move into "aid" South Africa after their inevitable collapse.

in sheer land power, maybe

I am pretty sure it was because of self defense. The chinese boxers sperged out thinking they had super powers and starting rebelling. I believe one of the boxers thought he was the second coming of christ or some shit. They got there shit pushed in by firearms.

NATO

The one where 50 states agreed to act as one country

Anglos + Jews

NATO or the Warsaw Pact

you're mixing up the taiping rebellion and the boxer rebellion.

basically a proto-nationalist group decided they couldn't be killed by foreign weapons and launched a crusade to remove foreigners.

The Dowager Empress decides to join with the rebels and declares war on everyone so naturally all the countries team up and kick China's shit in.

makes me feel warm and fuzzy seeing all these nations that worked together
why can't we all be friends

The alliance of my foot and your ass.

Accurate

economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21723133-brazil-russia-india-and-china-have-done-even-better-forecastthanks-mainly to China

Is that the League of Manlets?

The League of memes more like.

BRICS are the stupidest designation ever

>Implying Brazil is allies with any of them
>Implying that India views Russia as anything more than a source of cheap weapons
>Implying India and China are allies
>Implying south africa is relevant at all

Certainly not BRICS, if that's what you're implying.

The United States of America

Can't wait for BRICS to attack and destroy the wh*Te subhumans once and for all.

...

underrated

>NATO and friends curbstomp Sadam, round 1

Give it a few more years

...

Geography of India and China destined them to be eternal enemy of each other

That's what they always say.

Never happened. 23 did force 12 to stay or be destroyed, though.

This, India sides with the US.

>proto-nationalist group decided they couldn't be killed by foreign weapons
Niqqa what? How did they not realize they made a mistake upon seeing someone get shot

wh*tes btfo

How did we fuck up the Russian Civil War this bad m8s

Who is this "we" you speak of?

Serious answer?

1.) They sided with the western allies which made them appear as foreign puppets to most (which wasn't far from the truth)

2.) They were pro-continuing WW1 which was DEEPLY unpopular in Russia. This is the main reason that doomed the whites and why so many sided with the reds according to mos thistorians

3.) They tried to maintain the old russian empire, which drove ethnic minorities from their ranks. Though later after defeating the whites, the soviets would also move on the independent territories of the former russian empire

4.) The whites were officer-bloated and top-heavy and aristocratic in their nature. The strongest white army (Deniniken's South Russian Volunteers) had 300,000 men, of which 80,000 were officers (including 200 generals) and they all expected a position fitting for their rank and considered frontline fighting beneath them. They treated common soldiers like garbage whereas at least in appearance the bolsheviks were more equal.

5.) The whites antagonized swathes of the population against them, such as peasants when they expropriated resources/land, the re-institution of landlords in areas they controlled, and Jews with all the pogroms, causing more support for bolsheviks.

6.) The surprising military skill of Trotsky. He is one of the most underrated commanders in history. He inherited a really catastrophic situation and turned it into victory through 24/7 work. Inb general, a lot of skilled up-and-coming officers like Bruislov tended to side with the Reds as they were disenfranchised with the Tsarist regime and associated the white movement with it.

7.) The whites had too many conflicting agendas. This is of course a key one. There were monarchists, clergy, western-style liberals, ethnic minorities, mensheviks, socialist revolutionaries, nationalists, militarists, etc all among the whites and they never got along very well or coordinated much of anything.

8.) The allied intervention was half-assed & too small

Probably the anti-Hwan Finnish-WeWuzz alliance during the Hyperwar. Just imagine, if it wasn't for the Jedi's tactical mastery we'd all be speaking Mongolian right now.

Interesting, thanks. Although didn't get Trotsky lose in Poland? And did he have a military background

Trotsky didn't have much to do with Poland. Interestingly enough he opposed the invasion initially and it was largely Lenin's idea. The Bolsheviks put General Tukachevsky in charge of the operation with Stalin as his overseer. Stalin fucked shit up during it because of his personal distrust of Tukachevsky and it's largely why the Soviets lost at warsaw

And Trotsky didn't have a military background, no. During 1917 he intensively read on military strategy from everyone from Clausewitz to Robert E. Lee to Alexander the Great

putin really hates that he's not in the center.

Western Allies at the end of WW2 and shortly after. America alone was 50% of world gdp and the only state with nukes.

Qings wanted to kick out Western Boys

>read on military strategy from everyone from Clausewitz to Robert E. Lee to Alexander the Great
>instantly reminded of 'that guy' who obsesses over napoleon and ww2 war strategy


Imagine losing your empire to this dude.

Underneath our starry flag we'll civilize 'em with a Krag!

Veeky Forums

Five Eyes.

This before 1980

t.

You can just tell that Putin washed his hands profusely after that photo

None of this actually answers the question, just regurgitates propaganda.

Because they were each occupying parts of China and the Chinese rebellion was too strong for them individually.

Pretty sure that was Xi.

Well... honestly, yeah, probably. Kinda bland, but, well, combining all north atlantic nations and almost all of Europe into a vast military alliance is a pretty good way to create the most powerful one of all time.

Kek'd loudly, here's a (you)

India and China absolutely despise each other.

youtube.com/watch?v=yTdrmvmeRKo

>Geography of India and China destined them to be eternal enemy of each other
China and India was never enemy until or after British Colonial era. Almost 90% of border disputes are left by British.

That's modern time, not always, not eternal, moron.

>most powerful alliance
>spell BRICS wrong

>That's modern time, not always, not eternal

Yes, it is. It's sealed when Chinks expanded their territory to Tibet.

>Yes, it is. It's sealed when Chinks expanded their territory to Tibet.
Sauce: your ass.

Tibet was included in Chinese territory only since Yuan, but there was still little to no conflicts until British colonists arrived. You know why? Because those borderlines are drew by British, not Chinese nor Indians.

> BRICS
> alliance

Probably by applying some sort of no true scotsman-fallacy.

>He's forgetting that China had not expanded as far west yet when Euros arrived.
China has been gobbling up land for centuries. They took the land of the Mon, Miao, Hmong, Manchus, Uighur, Tibetans Taiwanese - even had Korea a few times. If Euros had not arrived the Chinese would have certainly ventured into fertile India for the same reason they ventured into SE Asia.

>but there was still little to no conflicts until British colonists arrived

Yes, because Chinks only fully annex Tibet after Qianlong era.

>Chinese would have certainly ventured into fertile India for the same reason they ventured into SE Asia.
See this>He's forgetting that China had not expanded as far west yet when Euros arrived.
No, I didn't. China and India has been neighbors for thousands of years, but how many conflicts or "invasions" did they have until 20th century? Could you find me a solid real example? Not just your imagination?

I know whit*loid supremacist want China and India to be enemy forever but that's just your wishful thinking.

>because Chinks only fully annex Tibet after Qianlong era.
No, Yuan dynasty already had troops stationed in Tibet.

What don't you stop spouting shits you don't know.

>China and India has been neighbors for thousands of years

They did not

>Yuan Dynasty is Chinese

Also it's pretty much abandoned after Yuan collapsed and the Chinks kick them back to Mongolia

>China, in northeast of India
>India, in southeast of China
>Hurr Not neighbors.

Yes, Yuan is a Chinese dynasty ruled by Mongols who stationed troops in Tibet and didn't invade India.

Indisputably correct

>The combined military spending of all NATO members constitutes over 70% of the global total.

>Poland is neighbor of France

WE

*were Yuan dynasty.

I remember these EXACT words being said in 2010 LOL

>current neighborhood is the same as 1400s map

>Poland is neighbor of France
Nope. But China and India is.

He's right you fucken brainlet

>Current
That's right, not muh thousands of years

USA and Jerusalem :^)

t. Geography brainlet

>not muh thousands of years
Yeap, only around 800 years, still no conflicts.

>800 years

>t. Geography brainlet

Elves and Men.

Deal with it, your whi*eloids, no matter how hard you try to portray China and India as " Muh Eternal Enemy", it's still far from true.

Even the latest Doklam incident didn't become actual war.

>recently
That is my point, not muh thousand year meme

probably because no one wants an unironic war except maybe subhuman BJP followers who want le ebin war with pakistan just like when they were underage in 1999

>recently
>muh point

It’s more true now than it was in 2010, tbqh. China has never been so powerful, Russia is back to causing international havoc through subversive operations to the point of destabilizing its main rival and India is following on China’s footsteps. Only Brazil and SA are lacking behind.

>territory hold for a small time then abandoned it
>not fully anex it until more than 400 years later
>hurr durr neighbor for thousand years

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/China–India_relations
Look up early history. They seem like neighbors to me.