Are Germanics really just superior?

Sometimes you can't help but admire the Germanic. Both the reason for his success and his lowness is rooted in the fact that he has no standards or expectations - and is very proud of it.

As shown in this post.

Does it hurt being that brain damaged or you just don't notice it?

>>never got conquered by the Romans
They were

>conquered almost all the Celts
Never happened

On the contrary all the Germanic tribes were ruled by a Celtic warrior nobility :

Suebi = Ariovistos
Marcommani = Maroboduos
Cimbri and Teutones = Boiorix Gaesorix
Sicambri = Deuorix, Biturix
Franks = Merovicos, Teutomer, Dagomaros, Dagobert

And so on
>basically created western civilisation
LMAO

>created the most powerful countries in Europe
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAA

France and Russia are, your regional power AT BEST

>started the industrial revolution
The English who are mainly Celtic did it, Germanic barbarians were unable to even construct stone-buildings

>still are better than the rest of Europe to this day
Better at Achmed and Jamal*

>bonus: maintained their languages compared to Cuckelts for example who speak latin
You adopted the language of your Celtic Overlords and bastardized it*

>Cuckelts for example who speak latin
No such thing

England and most of the areas painted red in continental Europe were not Germanic at the time of being conquered by the Romans.

He's technically not wrong, see That said, losing it to the Soviets was still a tragedy. Russians might be mostly Slavic racially, but their culture is something weird and Asian and non-European and they turn every place they conquer into a trash heap because of it.

If anything, they have developed some of the most groundbreaking music of all time.

>your regional power AT BEST
You're regional powers AT BEST*

>Better at Achmed and Jamal
Better at importing Achmed and Jamal

fixed

>were not Germanic at the time of being conquered by the Romans

Are you implying that Marcomanni, Tongri, Suebi, and Franks weren't Germanic ?

Most perfidious and evil. They are like the Jews from their own propaganda. Ugly, parasitic treacherous creatures.

That map misses off a lot of Germanics. Parts of the "celtic nations" e.g. Edinburgh and Little England beyond Wales, have been Germanic longer than parts of England have.

>Are you implying that Marcomanni, Tongri, Suebi, and Franks weren't Germanic ?
No, but they did not migrate across Rhine until after the Romans had conquered up to the Rhine.

Scots is a germanic language

>Henry II accepted Bolesław I's gains, allowing the Polish Duke to keep Lusatia as a fief, with Bolesław I recognizing Henry II as his overlord. Henry II refused to allow Bolesław I to keep possession of Meissen, however. Shortly after Bolesław I's departure from Merseburg, an assassination attempt was made against him. Though the attempt failed, Bolesław I was seriously injured.

>In 939, an Obodrite attack left a Saxon army routed and its margravial leader dead. Gero in revenge invited thirty Slav chieftains to a banquet whereat he killed all but one, who managed to escape by accident.[6] In response, the Stodorani revolted against German overlordship and chased the Germans across the Elbe, but Gero was able to reverse this before Otto's arrival in Magdeburg later in the year. He subsequently bribed Tugumir, a baptised Slav prince, to betray his countryman and make his people subject to Germany.

This is how the Germanics "fought".

Nice power fantasy but Romans kicked their asses, and forced them to hide in their forests like wild beasts.

So is this about language or about race? Jamaicans speak a dialect of English. Are they Germanic?

British and Germans did all that. The rest of Germanics were as relevant as Slovaks.

I hope you're not one of those Scandicucks LARPing for what other nations did.

I like how this map randomly decides that Saxons stopped at Hadrians Wall and Bernicia wasn't a thing.

>England
>Germanic
That romantic meme has to die once and for all.
theguardian.com/science/2015/mar/18/genetic-study-30-percent-white-british-dna-german-ancestry

this. And Northern Ireland by diaspora extension
A Germanic language has been spoken in Lowland Scotland as long as it has in England

By that logic Germans wouldn't be Germanic since they have Celtic and Slavic DNA.
Icelanders and Faroese are also half Celtic.
Not to mention this Study doesn't really prove anything

...

This, Germanicus stomped in after Teutoburg with more legions and took an absolute dump on every tribe between the Rhine and Elbe.

He was blood-mad during that campaign yelling shit to his troops like, "Prisoners are needless: nothing but the extermination of this race would end the war!" He was basically becoming the Julius Caesar of Germania, but wasn't even pretending to be a good guy. He was accruing so much success and renown via total war that the emperor had him recalled before he could launch his 17AD campaign, which was expected to crush all resistance.

>Suebi = Ariovistos
>Marcommani = Maroboduos
>Cimbri and Teutones = Boiorix Gaesorix
>Sicambri = Deuorix, Biturix
>Franks = Merovicos, Teutomer, Dagomaros, Dagobert
don't forget Teutobod who ruled over Denmark.

No, they just settled in the good part of Europe. Eastern Europe and Balkans had to defend against Mongols, Turks, Tatars and other subhumans for centuries, and most of it had fallen to some foreign rule, so that certainly halted the development.

The only reason britain was so successful was because it was separated from the rest of europe by water.

If they knew that they were not facing men of integrity but simple minded barbarians who let themselves get bribed with trinkets, why would they fight?

I love how you completely ignored the part about assasination and backstabbing. Insidia was always the main weapon of German peoples.

>>never got conquered by the Romans
You were conquered by Afroasiatics who became your gods and ruling class

If eastern europe was not subhuman they wouldn't have been conquered in the first place

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

You're posting a map from the end of a conflict where the three most powerful states of the time had to gang up on Germany in order to beat them.

>had to gang up on Germany
Start shit, get hit son. Also Germany wasn't alone and would've lost hell of a lot sooner were they not allied with so many nations.

>yu ar all untermenschen useless dogs and we will exterminate you all
>gets BTFO
>NEIN NEIN NEIN MEIN DISANTVAGE UND SCHEEEEIIIIZE

>>Start shit, get hit son.
Nigger-Tier logic. That said, I don't really agree with Hitler's lunacy so what the fuck ever.

>>Also Germany wasn't alone and would've lost hell of a lot sooner were they not allied with so many nations.
This is straight up retarded. Italy was a joke, Japan could do nothing other then get shitstomped by the US, Romania was just about worthless, Hungary fought well for a minor nation but was still nothing compared to the sort of contributions the Canadians and ANZACs made.

Germany may as well not have had any allies in the conflict for all intents and purposes.

So much for those superior genes. And to think, having that huge ethnic population in Europe, all of them being pure ARYAN. You're a fucking joke Kr*ut, i'm so happy you're getting TURKED.com

I like the Dutch and I like the Nords, but get those krauts away from me

Hitler never implied the Americans or British were untermench, you're a little bitch.

Germanics are unironically superior but nothing else you said is true

>>never got conquered by the Romans
Still got their asses kicked by them constantly.
>>conquered almost all the Celts
You mean conquered the Roman lands that hadn't been Celtic for centuries like Gaul and Spain.

>doing this thing again
These are nations whose relevance is relatively recent. In another few centuries somewhere else will be hot shit.

Then whose left of these Germanics? 2bh I'm not even sure what Sweden or Norway has contributed to the world besides IKEA and snus, at least the Germans made some contributions to philosophy and science

It was built on top of an older Prussian (baltic) city

>created the most powerful countries in Europe
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAA

France and Russia are, your regional power AT BEST
>France and Russia got absolutely ravaged by Germany (twice) within living memory and it's continued existence was thanks to two other Germanic powers bailing them out.

Whoa, I am surprised to see that text not in the meme picture format. Are you by any chance retarded?

I love the German blood. But look, the one and only reason Rome didn't stomp Germania into mud was because there was nothing to be had. Germans were nothing but a bunch of tribal backwater hog farmers and spear chunkers, borrowing most of civilization they knew from trade and influence of Rome. Rome had the means, easily, but no reason.

Russians conquered Germans twice, and French conquered them countless times.

17th to early 20th century Germanics were top tier. Now they're just a broken dump. They fucked it all up somehow. Medieval and ancient ones weren't much to brag about.

youtube.com/watch?v=29-LRuuqFT0

They are inferior to middle eastern people, mongoloids and native americans

>Brits doing anything in ww2
Living Every Laugh

England, Austria, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Southwest Germany all got conquered by Rome. Several Germanic tribes also got genocided in their migrations.

What LOGAN PAUL should do next? Continuing his Vlog or .
youtube.com/watch?v=q-D2VOOgURo

>a movie
You sure showed me faggot.

Alt Right stuff

nothing belongs to g*Rmanic subhumans. they're an invasive specie and should be put down like rodents.

t. Bootlicking mutt

Are you fucking joking?
If not tell me so that I can laugh harder.
The fucking english were cucked hard by the french thats why english is so different from the other germanics.

The region of the Netherlands which was taken by the Romans was inhabited by Celto-Germanic people, not purely Germanic

Oh, and the Franks were north of the Rhine and thus never conquerd

>Celto-Germanic

No such thing

Literally means a fusion of celtic and germanic cultures at border regions. Not a hard concept to grasp. It's not like Gallia ended on one spot and the next place inhabited by germanic people was completely different

>Literally means a fusion of celtic and germanic cultures at border regions
No such thing

>Never got conquered by the Romans
>Apart from England, literally the greatest Germanic nation in history which basically was the industrial revolution, is the only reason the germanics are respected and not seen as either autistic warmongers or snow homos, with a highly Latinised language (literally the best Germanic language) and the only continental rival that can compete is a Gaulish, Latin, German antithesis.
Yea nah m8.

In Toxandria (Modern day North-Brabant in the Netherlands) the cultures exchanged alot due to trade or mixed through raiding across the dividing rivers.

They didn't just stick to their own side of the river. Even now we see cultural and linguistic overlap in border regions of countries.

You have to be pretty dense to not understand that cultures exchange things and come in close contact when they are basically neighbours

Not to mension that the regions throughout later ages and up to this day has been a cultural mixture of German/Dutch culture and French/Burgundian culture.

Region*

Are you seriously suggesting that in the last 200 years Germany has been martially subordinate to Russia and/or France?
You have to go back quite a while, literally before German unification in fact before you can reasonable assert France was the dominant power on the continent.
If we are going so far back would it not be salient to point out that the Franks were a Germanic tribe who conquered Gaul or that the Normans, the most ferocious and formidable among them where (while nominally French) a new wave of Germans who dominated the Chivalric age.

>Russians conquered Germans twice
Russia's military prowess which began in earnest during the reign of Peter the Great can be ascribed almost entirely to Germanic influence. Catherine the Great was Lutheran born and of German stock, Paul I was assassinated by a Hanoverian general. Germany humiliated and in fact destroyed the Russian empire in WWI and would have done the same in WWII where it not for the USSR's alliance with two other Germanic superpowers.
Do you really think the communist tactic of hurling shoe-less unarmed peasants deprived of their faith into the Wehrmacht would have been a successful tactic without US and British assistance?
In excess of 20 million casualties bear witness to the contrary.

Regardless, when did Russia conquer Germany twice?
Three superpowers (two of them Germanic) and France were able to (after the bloodiest war in human history) subdue Germany yes.
This is not tantamount to conquest by Russia alone.

>>never got conquered by the Romans

Napoleon literally surrendered twice to Germanics and the Roman Empire got torn to pieces by Germanics.
All for the better, Germanics have demonstrated they are most capable of high thought.

>the Roman Empire got torn to pieces by Germanics.
Autism.

>Killing defenseless people is point for Germanic superiority
So German history in a nutshell is not a parody, but actual serious documentary?

>Three superpowers (two of them Germanic) and France were able to (after the bloodiest war in human history) subdue Germany yes.
Oh boy, you sure do like being called retard.

>>never got conquered by the Romans
They were still swinging from trees by the time Romans were practicing rule of law
>conquered almost all the Celts
Scipio Africanus in Hispania and Julius Caesar in Gaul did all the heavy lifting there
>basically created western civilisation
That would be Carolingian France and the Catholic Church
>created the most powerful countries in Europe
Lost both world wars
>started the industrial revolution
The industrial revolution began in England
>still are better than the rest of Europe to this day
Being overrun by rapefugees
>bonus: maintained their languages compared to Cuckelts for example who speak latin
Destroyed reading and writing for centuries afterwards

The eternal Kraut’s lies won’t work here, barbarian

the territory was germanic long before a namesake

Germanic doesn't mean german

>the territory was germanic long before a namesake

>We wuz Old Prussians and shieet

Are you that fag who fanfic'd that franks were celts based on a flawed interpretation of linguistics?

>If we are going so far back would it not be salient to point out that the Franks were a Germanic tribe who conquered Gaul or that the Normans, the most ferocious and formidable among them where (while nominally French) a new wave of Germans who dominated the Chivalric age.

Meanwhile in reality, Salian Gauls(Salii Gallicani in Latin) genocided the Wisifaggots, the Burgaydians, and the Cucksons removing any germanic stains from France. They then proceeded to rape out of existence Thuringians, Hessians, Rhinelanders who are now closer to French than to North Germans due to INTENSE and LONG rape that took place during the French Conquest of Gayrmania.

>Using an 80 year old source with /pol/ infographic tier racial pseudoscience unironically

He's right though. Ancient Germania aka modern German territory was mostly l1 haploshit, Frankish crusade against Saxons made the whole germany R1b dominant.

Colonizers came from Belgium, France and Netherlands and they were R1b, unlike l1 germanics.

ITT Krauts acting like every Germanic is a German and Polacks acting like every Slav is a Polack

Not him but Coon is not considered pseudoscientific.

Coon's work hasn't help up in the slightest since anthropology started utilizing population genetics. At the time it was scholarly but it's since expired.

>l1 haploshit
doggerlandians

Germanics weren't pure I1 and the R1b mixture into the region happened fucking two thousand years before the Frankish crusade against Saxons.

>Coon
>Pseudoscientific
LMAO

Coon wasn't your average g*rmanoid amateur-anthropologist like Madison Grant.

He was professor of at Harvard, and president of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, several of his conclusion were confimed by genetics, as an example :

Late Natufian being " a basically Mediterranean type with minor negroid affinities."

One Natufian sample does indeed carry a tiny ammount of Pigmy-like(not Bantu) admixture.

I'm well aware of his credentials but doesn't change the fact that referring to races as caucasoid, negroid, and mongoloid is pseudoscience. Population genetics has wholesale debunked that view. Ergo, bringing it up now is to use it as pseudoscience.

>Population genetics has wholesale debunked that view.

Not really

>putting circles on a graph is not pseudoscience

Okay user. Let me know when your work is published.

Obsolete theories are not the same thing as pseudoscience. It's like saying Newtonian mechanics are "pseudoscience" because they got superceded by quantum mechanics at a certain level.
Pseudoscience is shit like ancient aliums and numerology.

>Population genetics has wholesale debunked that view
Population genetics only proved that "Mongoloid" and "Europoid" races are not really separate but a single compact continuum pretty much from Lisbon to Mongolia.
Meanwhile there's still a massive genetic distance between Africans are everyone else. So it's not Europoid, Mongoloid and Negroid separate races, but Eurasian and Negroid.

I'm drawing circles to allow leftist brainlets like you to understand how genetics work