ITT: Come up with ways how hitler couldve invaded britain

Just build better planes, invent radar, and defeat the royal navy. LMAO!

>>use your navy to create a distraction and land your guys in the mean time

"Gee the comparative tiny German navy is doing something over there, better go send literally our whole fleet to check that out and not guard the fucking country at all"

(Bonus points for crossing/landing without/with inadequate naval protection, as you've sent the whole fleet off as a "distraction" somewhere)

>transport new men and supplies through air

What is air superiority and what was the Battle of Britain? Also, logistics are Jüdische Physik. Report to concentration camp.

Stop replying to bait

Sack Göring and put someone actually competent in charge of the Luftwaffe.

How to invade modern countries with navies an nukes:

1. Make your country shit
2. Millions of your citizens flee to the richer nation
3. They have a fuck ton of kids but keep your culture
4.instill in them that they are poor and the other nation is rich due to opression
5. Use numbers to take control of government

Mexico is btfoing the US, China is btfoing Canada and Australia, and Arabs and Africans are face raping the Europeans.

send in your navy
wait for it be surrounded by entire british navy
pray for meteor to hit the area obliterating everything
both sides no longer have navy
swim across

Napoleon version:

>create a distraction with navy and land troops
>transport men and supplies with hot air balloons

He should have just opened the console and used the ic command to instant build a navy

The krauts needed twice the submarines and air forces they had on hand, and then a successful invasion would have been inevitable, given the bongs were bankrupt anyway. The problem would come if the US intervened directly, and absent Pearl Harbor, that wasn't at all a certainty.

>a successful invasion would have been inevitable
Just a reminder, this is the mighty fleet unironically planned to carry this invasion, fucking river barges

Doesn't really matter how they get there, as long as they get there.

americuck subhuman

My point is they won't get there, they would have to carry the tanks in parts and assemble them, it was a joke plan

>Glorious Revolution the shit out of the Bongs.
kek

They will get there. And it doesn't matter how they do it, river barge or no. Look on the innertubes and you'll find photographs of Rommel's gang unloading shipborn tanks, fully assembled, which proceeded to destroy the bongs in any of the various battles he destroyed them in North Africa. It's not about the plan, it's about engaging a bankrupt enemy and forcing them to submit.

Do you think D-Day would have worked with Dutch river barges?

Napoleon would have had a much easier time then hitler, all he really needed to do was to keep his own navy alive(avoid or win the battle of trafalgar) and not invade Russia although this does require a fair bit of hindsight as the actions of the Russians were far more destructive to themselves then Napoleon conquering their nation would have been.

The bankrupt 1940 bongs didn't have the US to carry them, and they certainly were not the 1944 Wehrmacht, which the US had to square off against.

The bankrupt bongs who outproduced the Luftwaffe even without LL?

The bankrupt bongs who were bankrupt and had to beg the US for help, or submit to the Nazis.

What if they all swam across? Casualties from drowning couldn't be worse than the eastern front.

Could work

By beg you mean the Destroyers for Bases deal?

By beg I mean beg, on their knees, being bankrupt as they were.

An invasion was nigh impossible. First, the Luftwaffe was unable to destroy the royal navy (the main obstacle to a German landing) and even if they had managed to cripple a significant portion of the Royal Navy you can bet that the surviving elements would mount suicidal charges against any attempt to land troops on the beaches. Secondly, Germany simply didn't have the logistical capability to transport the men, food, ammunition, fodder and all the other random bits of shit you need to mount an invasion. Even if they'd managed to land a decent size force they would quickly become bogged down by the multiple lines of static defences constructed after Dunkirk. A German invasion was impossible and if it was, by some miracle successful, the occupation afterwards would be even more of a headache.

Any German success would probably have to rely upon Britain suddenly being infected with mass retardation. So Wunderwaffe are key

>given the bongs were bankrupt anyway
[citation needed]

>germanys best and brightest couldn't think of a way
>some internet nerds might tho lol

>people still reply to the bongposter

Citation of 1940 Bongistan's bankrupt status unneeded other than for historical illiterates

Those internet nerds know what happens in the future though

>pro nazi revolution in Britain
Legitimately one of the best methods desu. They should have started an all out propaganda war as early as the mid 30's.

>secretly ally with ireland
>stash enough troops and supplies then blitzkrieg to london

easy peasy

bankrupt is a specific term with specific meaning.

specifically it means unable to meet current financial obligations.

at no point during the war was that the case, at worse the british had a liquidity issue forcing them to take out long term loans, those loans were never defaulted on.

the liquidity problem was caused in large part due to the US companies demanding gold upfront as payment for weapons.

but eventually the US realised that the UK was in a stronger condition than they had believed and extended its credit to more appropriate levels - appropriate in this instance meaning within the UKs ability to pay. - it should be noted at this point that the UK recieved nothing for free from the US and was expected to pay for every single item, despite the UK having shown unprecedented generosity to the US with the tizard mission a gift which had a real value to the US of billions.

regardless of the financial status of the UK in 1940 they were in no danger of immediate invasion from a germany which could neither defeat the RAF, push aside the RN long enough to get a force across or support that force for long in the field. the best case scenario for the germans when the invasion was wargamed post war was that they had survivors making it back across the channel.

Build a bunch of subs beforehand, bomb their farmlands, and do a good old fashioned siege on the entire island

>Japanese navy destroyed by planes
>German planes can't sink the British navy

Why not?

Okay, let me be more frank. You are lying, and that Britain wasn't bankrupt.

So you agree, the bongs were unable to fund themselves and had to beg the US to fund them, i.e. they were bankrupt. Good.

The "liquidity" problem as you reference it isn't a problem, it is the bankruptcy. They go out of business, unless they can successfully beg the US to fund them. They begged and the US provided the charity begged for. You seem to agree here as well.

Now, a bankrupt beggar is always in danger of invasion, as we know historically. Certainly the Japanese knew this, when they recognized the bankrupt status of the bongs and walked in and took the resources they wanted. They recognized the possibility that the bankruptcy was offering them. A beggar is always subject to invasion and submission. Always.

Fortunately, the bongs had a generous US and an autistic Hitler, who was feverish to kill Sovs.

Let me be more frank, you are a brainlet and the bongs were bankrupt and begging.

Then prove it you fucking liar. Hint, you won't be able to, because you are making shit up.

Take over egypt and gibraltar then bring the japanese navy to battle the royal navy in the british isles

>what is the RAF

Do your own research, child. The historical 1940 Bongistan bankruptcy is settled history. You're just uneducated.

I did my research, and it found nothing. You are lying; which is why you can't actually cite to anything.

Why do you think everyone is as stupid as you are? Did you get lost on your way to /int/?

No, lad, you did no research and are uneducated, which is why you're sperging out.

1) invent teleportation devices
2) teleport an entire army group in the area around London
3) use teleportation to solve all logistics problems
4) occupy Britain

Alternatively

1) invent teleportation devices
2) teleport behind the Queen
3) >ppsh.. nothin personnel... fellow germanic
4) get crowned King

Wrong.

>When discussing history, please reference credible source material, and provide as much supporting information as possible in your posts.

>When discussing history, please educate yourself in sufficient depth prior to the discussion, so that settled history and basic historical data is at hand, thus precluding the need to beg for spoonfeeding.

>If I constantly go on the attack, people won't realize I'm talking out of my ass.

>If you're a brainlet, you sperge out on the internet.

You keep going on about how this is basic knowledge yet you're completely incapable of providing a source, even something as simple as a Wikipedia article. The Economics of World War II has a section on British finance that details how the war was funded and the definite importance of Lend Lease, but nowhere is it mentioned that Britain was bankrupt or anywhere near as dependent on the US for funding as you describe. Here, let me "spoonfeed" it to you:
>As Sayers notes, about two-thirds of the deficit was financed by long-term domestic borrowing, with only one-third financed by short-term floating debt, principally in the form of Treasury Bills and Treasury Deposit Receipts. Only a small fraction of the deficit was financed through the expansion of the monetary base. Furthermore, the inflationary consequences of even this were muted by the extensive controls exercised over the banking sector, thus limiting the money multiplier effects.
Harrison, Mark, ed. The economics of World War II: six great powers in international comparison. Cambridge University Press, 2000 p.50
So most of their deficit was funded by domestic creditors, in contrast to Germany who let the presses run wild and ruined the Reichsmark by the end of the war. Waiting for you to bring up anything that counters this "settled history".

Make full alliance withs USSR, and just both spam planes, until british run out of bullets for theirs planes.
Then bomb everything, and prepare to land new troops via air

So you're acknowledging that the bongs had to beg 1/3 of their spending from others. Good. You're coming along, lad. That is the measure of bankruptcy, and thus the need to beg the US. You'll get there eventually, it's likely gonna take a bit more time though.

We're not talking about the krauts' finances, lad. No need to seek distraction. This is about the historical 1940 Bongistan bankruptcy and the imperative they recognized to get down on their knees and beg the US to fund them.

just enslave the whole population of poland to build a bridge across from Calais. Use superior panzer tanks and the luftwaffe to defend it as you creep towards England. Use uboats to destroy ships trying to come up the channel from either way. EZ stuff.

Are you fucking retarded? The Treasury Deposit Receipts and Treasury Bills were created so the government could utilize the liquid reserves of domestic banks. Nowhere is it said or even implied that they had to "beg" for that from other countries.
You either have zero reading comprehension or you're a troll. Either way, there's no use in responding to you anymore.

Promise Irish sovereignity and control of Britain including retribution, then land paratroopers en masse in Ireland, making the British Navy buttfucking worthless.

You do know Ireland and Britain are different islands right?

You only have 1 division of paratroopers before 1943, and to fly to Ireland you'd need to leave your own fighter cover. Coin toss whether they get slaughtered en route or slaughtered on the ground after landing.

The gap between them is narrow enough to make a pincer invasion from France too much a threat, and it deprives the British of much needed men. God damn, if every Irishman had come to the understanding that Germany was freeing them from British rule the Irish troops in the military alone would have revolted and the loss of morale alone would have caused British capitulation.

The Irish regiments of the British army in WW2 had no interest in being liberated from British rule idiot

Yeah I know, the whole IRA and troubles which came a couple decades later were an entirely new phenomenon :^)

>The regiments from Ulster were made up of Irish nationalists
>Which is why the volunteered to serve in the British military who only 30 years ago they fought against

>Irish Catholics did not serve in the military

>All Catholics are nationalists

>There weren't Irish Catholic Nationalists then

>These Catholic nationalists would have joined the British regiments instead of the IRA bombing campaign during WW2

Why not? They wanted sovereignity before, they wanted sovereignity after. Would this tiny period where they were being forced to die fighting for a nation that collectively shat on be any different?

invade some French duke or a Dutch stadtholder to do your bidding
if you feel particularly pressured have an Italian guy coming on to the mix but dont have any spaniard in the mix

Are you American by any chance?

>lose the argument
>better switch to personal attacks

I'm not the retard contending Irish Nationalists made up the majority of the ethnic Irish contingent of the British armed forces

At it's height it had 50,000 members and was such a threat it was outlawed, had Hitler managed to show greater economic support and made promises I don't doubt he could have won popular interest.

Wait, you think O'Duffy and his blue shirts were part of the British army?

No, but they would have facilitated and assisted in a German invasion, and any Irish would have balked at fighting their countrymen for the British except perhaps some of the Ulster. This also would have made Britain's position seem even more precarious, thus deflating support abroad.

Most of the "Irish" in the British army not from Ulster had never even seen Ireland, let alone considered themselves countrymen, having been born and raised in places like London, Glasgow or Manchester. The ACA could only muster 700 men to fight in Spain, was loathed by just about everyone because all they did was get drunk, and no one in Ireland really gave a shit. It's 50,000 members were mostly unengaged in the actual movement and a lot of them were women, borderline children and old men

That would have been dishonorable

Why would they even need tanks? Infantry and paratroopers took Normandy and secured a foothold in France, tanks come in later dipshit.

Hitler's whole plan was off in the timing. He should had stayed in the Non-Agression pact with the Soviets and focused on Britain first, using Uboats to cripple the navy.

Hell, he could have destroyed the RAF if he continued to bomb England's factories instead of their cities. But he fucked up, and it cost him in the end.

Set up hundreds of rubber tanks in Calais, near coast of Dover and leave a body in German uniform with documents detailing invasion plans through English Channel.
In the meantime gather up real invasion forces in Norway, and invade eastern Scottish coast. When the d-day comes, British would have to move most of their forces up north. That's when the southern coast invasion begins. Also, make a deal with Ireland to join the war.

>royal navy blocks all supplies and reinforcements and your army is now stranded

he would have needed soldiers that were immune to toxic gas

I don't think Napoleon could have waited that long. The way Hitler wins the Battle of Britain is not ordering the bombing of cities, and instead continue bombing the RAFs infrastructure. After that, cycle out some of the burned out pilots, and beef up the Luftwaffe. Rely on your complete air superiority and Submarine fleet to protect your transport vessels.

Why didn't Hitler just build more battleships

Why didn't Germany just build more fighters

they tried that

Build a truly massive air force that renders British naval supremacy moot. Have said air force win the Battle of Britain.

Launch a massive paratrooper invasion. Perfect air resupply techniques. Once industrial centres have been seized, have the troops "live off the land" - the Eternal Anglo deserves that much.

The trick is to render the Royal Navy irrelevant.

they were building 6 of them, but they needed the resources elsewhere, and the japanese entering the war meant they had less interest in establishing a blue water navy

What about... Kill 10000 Parisians every week Britain refuses to surrender in a highly publicized news reel.

imagine every training plane in britain outfitted with toxic canisters to fumigate the beaches

The depths of Anglo depravity

Why didn’t napoleon just use hot air balloons?