I see this meme a lot every time Nordicists get mocked...

This.
Italians were living in mud huts too before the Greeks civilised them, pic related.

African villages tend to be arranged in fractals

It satisfies my autism

Fucking pleasant

Why are they comparing archaic Nordic architecture to contemporary African architecture? No Nords live like that right now.

Reminds me of an Orc stronghold.

>africans live in mud hu-
You were saying?

didn't realize Nigeria had a Mandarin Oriental

They don't, but neither does scandinavia

Because trees in Sub Saharan Africa were either too large to break down or just inefficient. Nords has great sized trees so they were able to make planks.

>>Implying an outlier or two or even fifty or so doesn't change the fact that plenty of africans still live in mudhuts.
lol

More importantly though, Nordics wound up discovering America before columbus did and were exception shipwrights and explorers long before any west african group managed anything remotely similar.

That was all built by either white colonials or chinks

>discovering America
Except for the tens of millions who lived there, right?

>Nordics wound up discovering America before columbus did
And then got BTFO by the natives who had been there already for thousands of years
>were exception shipwrights and explorers long before any west african group managed anything remotely similar.
The phoenicians explored britain a thousand years before the Swedish ever got in a boat. And the asians were sailing all over the indian ocean with technology much better than the vikings ever were.
Just face it sw*de, your ancestors lived in mud huts and worshiped sticks and grass while the rest of the world was creating civilization.

Yes and? I specifically mentioned before Columbus, not before anyone else. The reason why I didn't mention the natives is because crossing the atlantic on a ship is far harder then crossing a land bridge.

>>tedious shitposting
I'm not even a swede moron, and the point here is that niggers, especially west african niggers, are inherently inferior to everyone else on the planet basically. So bringing up asians or whatever the fuck is really irrelevant to that. This board's childish rivalry with /pol/ and their love of all things germanic makes you people just as biased and stupid in your own way.

One last thing:
>>mudhuts
No.The post above is a proper example of Scandinavian houses during the early medieval period.

If they were so smart why didn't they form colonies there?

There were too few of them, the natives didn't like them, and nobody in europe at the time had the capability or the reason to support them.

...

Most Africans live like that?

Al-Umari visited Cairo after Mansa Musa stopped there during his historic hajj to Mecca, and recorded a conversation between Musa and his host, Abu'l Hasan Ali ibn Amir Habib. According to Musa, Abu Bakr became convinced that he could find the edge of the Atlantic Ocean, and outfitted an expedition of 200 ships to find it. Only one of those ships returned; the captain related that the expedition had come to a "river with a powerful current" in the ocean. The current took most of the fleet away, after which the captain turned back. According to Musa, Abu Bakr was undeterred and launched an even larger expedition with himself as the head, departing with 2,000 vessels for his men and a like number for supplies. He left Musa, his vizier, as his deputy during his absence. The expedition was never heard from again, and Musa became the next emperor.

Can’t fault a man for trying

Amazing... truly the master race

You’re gay lol

>>Most archaeologists, anthropologists, ethnohistorians, linguists, and other modern pre-Columbian scholars say that there is no evidence of any such voyage reaching the Americas, and that there are insufficient evidential grounds to suppose there has been contact between Africa and the New World at any point in the pre-Columbian era.[citation needed] For views representative of this point of view, see the considerations on the question advanced in Haslip-Viera et al. (1997), who for example note "no genuine African artifact has ever been found in a controlled archaeological excavation in the New World". See also the supporting responses in peer-review printed in the article, by David Browman, Michael D. Coe, Ann Cyphers, Peter Furst, and other academics active in the field. Ortiz de Montellano et al. (1997, passim.) continues the case against Africa-Americas contacts. Other prominent Mesoamerican specialists such as UCR Riverside anthropology professor Karl Taube are confident that "There simply is no material evidence of any Pre-Hispanic contact between the Old World and Mesoamerica before the arrival of the Spanish in the sixteenth century".[6]
So he sends some ships out into the atlantic and fails, unlike the "snowniggers" who manage to cross the frigid and iceberg laden waters of the north atlantic and manage to successfully cross?

Not very impressive for the nigs I'm afraid.

Nice contextless photograph.

Here's a little hint for you though: The early medieval period came before the 19th century.

>>ur gay
You like and defend niggers.

>Sailing the raging tropics = sailing the peaceful North Atlantic from a comfy Oceanic West Coast temperate climate

Lol

So? Kek

Lmao who painted that picture

Nice retort

>>ocean with icebergs in it
>>peaceful
lol indeed.

You’d be surprised what you can accomplish with mud.

That's pretty neat

yea dis be da home of our people before dem savage whitey ruined it with colonaism

>North Atlantic
>peaceful
Toppest fucking kek. Professional mariner here, shut the fuck up, you have no idea what you're talking about. The North Atlantic is one of the worst fucking areas to sail, regardless of whether you're in a sailboat or an oil tanker. The feats of navigation and seamanship that the Norsemen accomplished would not be replicated even by other Europeans for hundreds of years.

"Raging" tropics my ass. The tropics are only shitty for about two extremely predictable times a year. In fact, this whole fucking post is so terrible and uninformed that it has to be bait, and I have no idea why I'm replying to it. Fuck you.

Source? Like a mentioned dingus those buildings are not even from Scandinavia, they are from the historical area of old Saxony

I never said they were I'm just pointing out they OPs pic is cherry picked and the houses are g*rman not nordic

I don't really give a shit about stormfags or the neo-pagan Vargfags that think they're Vikings. But the fact that whoever made that thinks that a picture of a historical reconstruction of houses from 1000 years ago and an actual picture of how Africans live today is at all comparable is fucking hilarious

>that a picture of a historical reconstruction of houses from 1000 years ago
>1000 years

are you fucking high?

...

/thread.

>small area of desolate wastelands barely able to support crops with few resources which spawned a great literary culture and advanced technology
vs
>an entire continent with unending riches that still couldn't invent a fucking wheel

Nordhuts last longer than modern American houses :DDD

>look at me everyone I'm posting b8!
>everyone reply to my b8

It's not about engineering for the long term.

They appear to be of equal construction, based solely on this, a visual inspection at a distance.

Norse settlers actually built stone buildings in Iceland and Greenland due to lack of trees

>northern europeans were the scum of the earth and never accomplished anything because they were decentralized
so were the Greeks but they created civilization

Everyone was living in mud huts while the Sumerians were building cities and creating written languages

>an entire continent with unending riches
>unending riches
>Africa

I'd rather spend my time in a Siberian tundra, ffs.

Not really, also ironically Sumerians lived in mudhuts basically

...

...

DAS RITE

>Indonesia
I didn't know they're niggers now.

Lagos is in Nigeria, idiot.

Nordic village is better:
>a road
>furnace
>easy, yet practical construction
>houses with a lot of room in then
and n*groid one:
>no road
>no furnace
>impractical design
>huts with small room

this image is dumb, as the upper village is clearly superior, despite being obsolete in modern Europe

>ancient greeks
>meds
Nice try, but nope.

>nord
>can't stand 10 minutes in the mediterranean summer without dying of heatstroke
>"WE WUZ GREEKZ N SHIIET"

It really is. Mods are doing a bad job in this board

When a massive tornado rips through your street do you want broken bits of chip board and timber and plasterboard flying about at 200mph, or house bricks

>Muh melanin
Nice nigger tier argument.

>nordcuck
>no argument
>"come on think quick"

I didn’t even called you a nigger, I just said that your argument is nigger tier. Retard

>still can't refute argument and doesn't have any of his own
typical snownigger
maybe if you weren't so dumb you could have invented agriculture on your own without meds teaching you

Whats the point of having a steeped roof round house in Africa? It doesn't rain or snow all that often, you could save a fuck ton of thatch by have a flatter roof.

Are you implying that round houses arent fucking amazing?

>What is gothic architecture

>it doesn't rain in Africa
Half the continent is a literal rainforest you brainlet.

>architecture
>agriculture
read these back to back and tell me what each one means to you

I'm pretty sure the French rebuilt that.

French invention derived from Romanesque.

Never said i had anything against them.
I like British round houses, they're cool.

Romanesque derives from Visigothic architecture brainlet.

>5,000 year head start on germanics
>went on to preserve and improve roman culture once they got up on the timeline
that argument only works if you account for context
like subsaharans being around for 5,000 years and not even inventing the wheel

Nope, it derives from late Roman style.

I see very little resemblance desu

That's Neo-Gothic.

What about this?

That's High Gothic.

You're only partially right. Visigothic which dervied from late Roman architecture transformed into Romanesque.

Romanesque was created by the Byzantines

Visigothic is Pre-Romanesque, and no, it did not. Visigothic style borrowed primarily from Merovingian style.

Byzantines had very little influence in western Europe in the early Middle ages.
And if they did there would have been more domes on western European churches.

commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Byzantine_architecture_in_Italy

Not much, no.

(((Brinkmann)))

wtf. Scandinavians go there all the time pretty much just to sunbathe and they tan beautifully

wow nordcucks are proud about having better constructed huts than african huts lmao
its a FUCKING HUT

I lived in Senegal for 1/4 of a year, and i visited rural regions as well as Dakar nobody there lives in mudhuts. Maybe there are mudhuts in Africa but they're probably in the shittiest rural regions in the Congo

when it does rain, it rains hard

S-sure dude, what the fuck ever... you win ok? Nord huts are better.

I don't see anything that disproves mudhuts showing that nords were equivalent to africans for most of history. He makes excuses for nords not having stone structures because stone is hard to get, and then he brings up cavalry in the next post, yet Africa did't have horses because of the environment. So why are nords living in mud huts excused by lack of stone, but Africans not having cavalry not excused by their lack of horses?

Plus Africans had important trade networks across the Sahara. Democracy is most often a sign of backwardness in the ancient world, not "civilizational level", most early civilization are egalitarian. Plenty of African states had taxes and I'm sure they had law too.