Monday 16 October 2017
>we've got swell, get ready for the moon
>200 employees
>we are partnered with over 100 banks
>linkies prepare to be raped
>hahaha deluded linkie
>we've got Ben bernake
Seems you cripples have gone a bit quiet?
Monday 16 October 2017
Other urls found in this thread:
csbs.org
twitter.com
The problem is I don't think the company is interested at all in Ripple's price. That's not where they make money. Their goal is in creating technology for interbank transfers, cryptocurrency appears to be just a side effect of it.
ripple price has already basically recovered and link is in the gutter...wtf are you want?
oh gee wizz look whos been added to the us gov bank advisory panel at number 29
ripples market cap is $8,344,968,042 with 38,531,538,922 in circulation. That is the 3rd highest cap. With Etherium having only $29,342,758,654
Meaning if Ripple went x4 it would surpass Etherium. X12 we are talking BTC. Are people really saying Ripple will surpass or equally BTC for a 12x return on your investment?
What am I missing here?
LINK stands a better chance at reaching $100 a piece.
It is a legit company but surely the vast amounts of coin in circulation mean it will never surpass $1 maybe $2 a piece?
Big whoop you make like x4 on your investment if you buy now in 1+ years time.
Which is fine for 100k+ investments I guess but still.
what are you missing?
the idea that if its used what its designed for current market cap will be irrelevant. 100 banks are signed up to use it but a live network is still not in place. so consider this. swift processes around 5 trillion per day in wire transfers. say the banks that sign up suddenly start transferring billions per day between each other. from the inherent design of the token being burned on transaction the inherent value would have to increase to meet the need also creating an appreciating asset with the escrow as a buffer.
Recovered? lmao
It was 5k sats a few days ago, now it's 3.7k.
i longed on margin and lost 2.5btc this coin fucked me up