Makes you think

consider suicide

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index#Very_high_human_development

heh

Tell a Dominican he's black and you're liable to get in trouble. They hate Haitians and don't consider themselves black.

Haiti is just a shithole for many reasons but one of them is because they are black. You can have successful black states but it's going to be a more uphill battle than a successful Asian or European or South/Latin American mixed race state.

the real answer:
whites and yellows weren't shipped to their respective islands by force
each kind does best when left to their own devices

i believe even darkies will prosper in their own timeframe, if left to it, eventually.
even if you believe they are dumber and more violent; surely they are best adapted to deal with their own dumbness and violence

That doesn't make them not black.

>isolated on an island
>create a global trading empire in complete isolation
>defend your isolation by sending armies to continental europe and naval fleets to india and asia
>isolated explorers explore the farthest reaches of africa and asia in isolation
>isolated war against an isolated colony over an isolated incident
>ironically have really poor isolation

really makes you think

>You can have successful black states but it's going to be a more uphill battle than a successful Asian or European or South/Latin American mixed race state.

Not really. Many nations have a fuckton of help from other entities to develop so isolated development never really was a thing.

Euros (not uniformly they did it under different time spans and starting dates) were the first to industrialise. Asian societies did it under a shorter period due to "assistance" (either aid or jsut investment) from western entities (as well as Asian ones). African societies are industrializing currently similarly unlike Asia but under a time where global technology is much more important and much more developed (such that in development they are "skipping steps" in various things).

Each of the 3 have different issues mainly in being the first adopters, the midling of the pack with more incoming competition and finally being on the tail-end of things where all the viable ways of development are weakens due to the actions of various foreign entities and polices.

DR was a ranch more or less. Also notably bigger and not right in the middle of hurricane alley.

Pardon my Trump, but are you implying that the Dominican Republic is not a shithole?

Compared to Haiti DR looks like a first world country. That's why Haitians migrate even though they get treated like garbage. youtube.com/watch?v=Sg8IB21Au-U

>i believe even darkies will prosper in their own timeframe, if left to it, eventually.
>eventually

Is this accurate?

>whites not shipped to islands by force
What about Australia?

Pretty much.

I think the main difference is Australia was a penal colony, however backwards the punishment was just that, a punishment. Where as slavery the only reason they're in servitude is because of their skin colour, hence not a punishment (except by evolution lmao). Prisoners in Australia could earn their freedom after a certain amount of time depending on the crime, slaves were slaves for life.

Almost all of Australia was colonised by regular settlers. Them being all descended from convicts is a meme for brainlets.

>"osama said CIA didn't help him so must be true!!!!!"
>unironically believes this