SERIOUS LINK DISCUSSION THREAD

SERIOUS LINK DISCUSSION THREAD.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=x1R7wFK9SwE
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

no sergey you already lost your chance blame your cult shills for your meme karma, bitch

Il hold my mere 13k Link well into 2018, i dont care anymore.

This guy.
Are you trying to fight us tsuruku-poster, or what? You're not going to win. There are dozens of us.

JUST

It's tsuruko you weeb

*tsuruko
Fuck, I'm sorry.

>buying LINK
>buying ANY altcoin
why do people do this?

...

His eyes are uneven eyes are in an uptrend.

5 dolalrs EOY confirmed.

ayyyyyyyyyyyyyy take this piece of shti back to 5 cents where it belongs, not even worth its ICO. You would have had a couple of big fucking whales dominating nodes, so you may as well fuck off to chink land.

WHo's gonna buy your chainlink? The banks sure arent seeing as good ol sergey has 350 mill for them at whatever price the banks negotiate. Prob half of ICO, maybe even just 1 cent.

But yeah, you guys "HODL" and watch the market cap decrease in line with crypto total MC because of a 350 mill coin release. SO many new crypto reatards here it hruts

youtube.com/watch?v=x1R7wFK9SwE

>LINK literally at an all-time low
>literally everyone who is still holding LINK is a bagholder
godspeed friends

...

Holy shit thanks user I was gonna sell but this post has given me the power to HODL

I have no doubt you are some ugly, lonely, fat loser. Like wtf are these things you're posting?

That thing looks like a junkie tranvestite, I can't tell if its a girl or a boy.

Same with fucking 12 year old girl people keep posting.

I am legit happy with myself for slagging people like you during high school. Fuck. You're all so creepy.

>12 year old girl
she's 19 apparently

I'd fug her no lie

She literally looks pre pubescent man. Fucksake what is wrong with everyone here.

I'm presuming its the absolutel lack of testosterone on your average 4channer who cant deal with a normal girl, so has to get the most feeble looking "female" in order to not feel insecure?

Lemme guess you're scared of colombian women yeah?

Why so mad?

>SERIOUS LINK DISCUSSION
>SERIOUS

Veeky Forums - Business & Finance

Current state of LINK
> smart Veeky Forumstards sold before SIBOS at $0.50
> others sold after because they're scared of bags (note: these aren't bags)
> this dump was inevitable because these doritos crumb finger licking NEETs were all waiting to take their profits and go on to the next 2x, 3x shitcoin
> LINK will bounce back
> $4 by the eoty

Did you get triggered by me shit-talking your shitcoin? How much did you lose?

Mate what the fuck do you want to know about LINK?

Your boy serg has kept 350 million LINK for the banks to buy at their negotiated price, considering their influence and leverage (i.e no partnership LINK unless you sell at 1c per token).

Crypto marketcap will increase will Chainlink's MC decreases.

Also why do you think any one cares atm? Anyone with half a brain sold above 7500 sats. It's all BTC atm, there'll be a small correction after BTCgold cos people are retards, but everyone will in BTC till at least november & X2.

If you're looking for a value estimation, do you honestly think LINK won't fall further in a month with all the hype/news/ about BTC? Everyone is getting every spare cent they have to buy it and hopefully tether/fiat it at the peak and rebuy.

Then and only THEN you may see an uptrend for LINK. There you go.

Also your oracles will be dominated by a whale group who already own millions of link per whale. Not like you care about the tech anyways, you're in this for the money. Chainlink was August/Septembers flavour of the month and you didnt get out of the train cos you're an idiot/ new.

You want to feel goo about yourself go to their LINK subreddit, where they all hold each other's balls saying it'll pay off in 2019.

Buy low, sell high, move on. If it dips again, buy back in. if not, pick another. You miss moons every day but dgaf because you're not emotionally invested.

Next 4 weeks of your life are BTC.

No LINK is retarded atm. Only thing triggering me is how you and your weeb friends are peadophiles, like stop posting photos of women trying to look like children.

Christ.

loneliness and too much time watching porn gives you weird tastes

That link is for the network, not the users.
You absolute retard.

you linkies missed obsidian, nav, zen, metaverse, btc, and even solarcoin. holy fuck.

You owe me 0.3 BTC
14odZ5ZW22iAW9TiNcDT2bWVv6w1wiaCaD

so triggered. can't control emotions. must've lost a lot of money on LINK due to weak hands lols.

Linkies live rent free in your head

obsidian? try a little harder next time

please help me I have nothing. Pennies accepted lol

BTC: 1EbC1N12ctHhPZUYHffCzyUbtk1CZdxDBj
ETH: 0x5d54713e65612145cd3559fb13574face1b0adbc
LINK: 0x5D54713e65612145cD3559Fb13574fAce1b0aDBC

>Also your oracles will be dominated by a whale group who already own millions of link per whale. Not like you care about the tech anyways
Even if you don't care about the tech you really shouldn't be spouting bullshit like that which can easily be disproved by so much as skimming the whitepaper. I don't know where this meme of whales having a lot of LINK somehow magically centralizing the system started, but how much each node stakes on their correctness is not the prime deciding factor of which ones get picked. It's just one piece of data you have access to when deciding which nodes to use and how heavily to weight them when working out the consensus for your specific query. That's literally all it is: a node puts up X LINK showing you how confident it is that it will be correct. If disagrees the rest of the network it loses its stake, so nodes with a higher stake have a higher incentive to not provide faulty or tampered-with data. You get to decide how much that promise is worth to you - if at all - when selecting and aggregating the nodes you want. ChainLink is highly resistant to centralizing forces of any kind because you would need a third of the nodes you picked to be colluding for them to have a chance of influencing the consensus in such a way that benefits them and reduces the robustness of the data. If you suspect that the five "best" (lowest fees, highest uptime, highest stakes, highest accuracy, largest variety of sources for your desired piece of data, use of trusted hardware, or whatever other criteria you have personally chosen to select nodes by) nodes could potentially be colluding with each other, then literally all you have to do is select 15+ nodes for your valuable transactions to ensure your oracle queries cannot be compromised by their influence.