Traditionalism

Nowhere in "Three aspects of the jewish problem" does Evola call Stirner a jew, not even mentions him at all

Radically untrue. Evola speaks of Stirner in both The Path of Cinnabar, and Ride The Tiger. In the former, he claims to have gone through a Stirner "phase" as a youth, and in Ride The Tiger refutes him from his Traditionalistic perspective.

Evola was, likewise, not the kind of person to just go around calling people "Jew" for the sake of it, given that he loved Kabbalah, and refuted Antisemitism for purely biological purposes.

have fun with your larping thread

Bump

Is it just my perception or do neo-traditionalist really pretend like if there is some universal, timeless concept of Tradition?

>I'm a traditionalist

>inb4

Evola would have sided with Islamic radicalism, right? A bunch of violent mystical mass murderers who reject life and instead treat reality as some medieval fairy tale existence?

Umm no sweetie

I think it's more a criticism of big glass buildings without soul. Sagrada Familia's a cool building too and it's not explicitly traditional. To build things with soul, we would probably have to really change our culture first.

A wet carrot could refute Stirner. Stirner is the angry, ill-considered teenager of philosophy, stomping on the ground because his parents took his DS away. He has no real plan, only that everything should be considered a spook, yet somehow believes the natural social and legal structures that communities create are not themselves the same thing as governments. He's someone that wants to tear everything down and pretends that everything can be torn down forever.

Why not?

Because he would actually have to fight on the front.

>A wet carrot could refute Stirner. Stirner is the angry, ill-considered teenager of philosophy, stomping on the ground because his parents took his DS away. He has no real plan, only that everything should be considered a spook, yet somehow believes the natural social and legal structures that communities create are not themselves the same thing as governments. He's someone that wants to tear everything down and pretends that everything can be torn down forever.
This style of writing is really cringey, please top trying to imitate every ebin polemicist.

I was just writing from the heart, but serious question, how would you have written that?

Didn't Evola condone the public raping of girls to reinforce the patriarchy though

>we shit on materialism

"feels > reals"

>A wet carrot could refute Stirner. Stirner is the angry, ill-considered teenager of philosophy, stomping on the ground because his parents took his DS away. He has no real plan, only that everything should be considered a spook, yet somehow believes the natural social and legal structures that communities create are not themselves the same thing as governments. He's someone that wants to tear everything down and pretends that everything can be torn down forever.

t. I don't get Stirner.

Here's a tip: he never says that ideas are themselves to be ignored on the basis of them being ideas.

No. He talks about an Indian yogic metaphor called “raping the virgin” that has to do with mediative practices. That’s about the closest I can think of.

is that in Eros?

Not him but I would have written
>The problem with Stirner (according to Evola) is that he's self-refuting
That way you can get your point across without sounding like a faggy 14-year old.

did you even read stirner nigga

Shakti and the secret way, but I think Eros has some stuff like that as well.

>innovation necessitates atheism, materialism, jewery, and pretending nothing but yourself exists
booty blasted modernist detected
No you should not innovate, you have no original ideas.
In building a house you do not tear out the foundation to put on the roof. Traditionalism is building the roof upon the foundation.
>using a trad meme
already proven yourself to be a brainlet