Go to casino

>go to casino
>1.000 on the red
>if win I have 1.000 free dollars
>if lose I bet 3.000 on the red
>if win I have 2.000 free dollars
>if lose I bet 9.000 one the red
And so on. Find a flaw.

Other urls found in this thread:

rouletteonline.net/roulette-systems/martingale/
bettingsimulation.com/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Living on planet Earth is the flaw.
That's why so many people on this board want to go to the Moon or even Mars for that matter.

with what capital

You're forgetting about the green spots, the zeros. Trust me, I've used that system before and it's a lose-lose scenario. Your best option, if you're going to use that system is to find a european roulette wheel as they only have 1 green slot instead of 2 like american roulette. Caesars Palace has a few european roulette wheels, but the buy in is higher.

Bankroll gets wiped out rapidly after a couple losses

Add me on Skype: CryptoAnna

putting down on red isn't x2

I played that game and made a couple hundred it was fucking hilarious the guy that was there started losing fuck loads of money it was like i stole his powers

casinos won't let you do this. They have table limits, and if you try to pool with other people, they will figure it out and throw you out. What you are talking about is called the martingale system, and it's one of the easiest systems for casinos to recognize and break.

rouletteonline.net/roulette-systems/martingale/

There are a few issues to bear in mind when it comes to using the Martingale system in roulette. The first issue is the harsh reality that the Martingale system will not allow you to overcome the house edge in roulette. Every bet you make still has an edge for the casino and, while the times when you lose your entire bankroll will be rare, they will happen often enough to cause you to eventually lose money at the expected rate (at least in the long run).

This might not always be true if you had a literally infinite bankroll, as then you could play as long as necessary until you finally scored a win and you’d still come out ahead by $5 at that point. But unfortunately, even for those with extremely large bankrolls, there is another pressure on the system. That is the maximum bet at your table.

Imagine that your roulette table has a $5 minimum and a $500 maximum. That means you could make seven bets – wagers of $5, $10, $20, $40, $80, $160 and $320 – before you will no longer be allowed to double your bet.

This means that if you should lose seven consecutive bets you’ll ultimately have gone “bust” for that cycle, and you’ll have lost a total of $635. That would be fine if you’d only lose seven times in a row once every 128 cycles, as that would be enough to break even. However, on an American roulette wheel this will actually happen about once every 90 cycles – too often for you to show a profit.

The numbers are better in European roulette, as you’ll only go bust once every 106 cycles or so – but that is still not good enough to beat the house.

It’s also worth noting that you’ll need a rather large bankroll when compared to your initial bet to use this system. In the example above, a $5 initial bet requires a bankroll of $635 in order to play the system for at least seven consecutive spins.

bettingsimulation.com/

tried this with dogecoin betting. you do the math, and you think you could never lose 12 times in a row, until it happens and you are out of capital.

Pretty much this. I've made up to $8k a night using this system. I've also lost huge when the board starts alternating colors. I've seen it go red to black to red to black dozens of times before is lands on two colors in a row again. Also, if you see the pit boss send in a new dealer, that's time to walk away from the table.

go on primedice and do that, you're pretty much right

>bet in a casino
>leave
>make the second bet in another casino, or in the same a few days latter

The table limits will still be in place, when you hit the limit you are kill, black / red is not a 50 / 50 chance, the greens make you lost ogre time

...

>It's black 8 times in a row
>You now have to put 256k in to make your money back+1000

>lose 6 times in a row
this happened to me doing that

If martingale doesnt work then why do casinos try to crack down on it? Really makes you think

Ya ive done this on the Novaexchange dice game. Its all fun and games til you make 12 bad rolls in a row

The chance of losing could be .00000000001% and somehow you'll still manage to lose. trust me don't fuck around with gambling

It furthers their edge and they can use some perfect excuse like being responsible to do it.

have to start on the $2 dollar table, and even then, one bad streak and you're fucked, try it with online roulette, works for a while, maybe a good long while, but it all comes tumbling down

OP just take all your btc and roll dice using this method. 100% promise you will never lose ever at all once. That's how we're all rich here on Veeky Forums.

Who knows, maybe you could be come the next Steve "Empty my clip on the Vegas strip" Paddock.

I used that system betting on draws during soccer games
It was going all fine until my teams hit a draw streak like 5-6 games in a row, and I would've to start putting scary amount of money into it to keep going, so I quit that shit
this expotential growth will kill you

Martingale system is a losing game even if you're getting perfect 50% odds at 2x. It's simple math.

What's the reason for walking away after a dealer change?

>the green spots
This

streak without a draw*

>you think you could never lose 12 times in a row
user, I am so sorry. I saw your post and laughed at it thinking what kind of beta cuck loses 12 times in a row, so I generated a random number between 1 and 4096, called out 2202 while it was generating and then
>PIC FUCKING RELATED HOLY FUCKING SHIT
I am never laughing at someone who loses 12 times in a row ever again.

Brainlet detected.

Martingale is a losing system. You're more likely to win than lose but the wins are tiny and the losses are catastrophic. Over the long run you'll lose more than you win.

Casinos don't give a shit if you use Martingale. But it's bad for business. Table limits are designed to slowly bleed patrons weekend after weekend in low variance bouts. If everyone played Martingale they'd eventually suffer catastrophic losses and be turned off from ever gambling again.

If you're some whale with millions to blow and specifically ask the casino to up the table limits they would gladly do this.

could you put $49 on black/red and $1 on green to hedge against this?
t. not a gambler.

You can actually gain an edge by exploiting the inherent determinism of brick and mortar roulette. Something like 10%-15% in your favour. They'll throw you out real fast though lol.

>"the gamblers fallacy isnt a thing"
but it is

You have negative expected value on every bet (because you are not actually paid enough, even if you do win), so if you treat it as a simple math problem you will always lose no matter what.

Did this in runescape, didn't work. Lost $1200 staking. Don't let a computer algorthim dictate 'randomness' because 0.0078% chance of losing 9 stakes in a row seems rare but it happened.

Theres only a few beatable fames in a casino. Blackjack, poker, video poker, sports betting . Some other games vecome profitable with progressive jackpots etc. No martingale system will help you, better off studying a proven card counting system, and playing blackjack, but also you have to fly under the radar.

I've been backed off many from blackjack tables. Its fun

>he didn't host with 55-60% odds in his favor

lmao

...

Does counting still work? Did you do this professionally?

>Biz can't figure this out

Maybe a way to beat the roulette wheel would be to become a psychic

Of course it works, you just can't have a certain probability without knowing the population

>bet your whole life savings on a random number
>if you win you're rich now
>if you lose go back in time and bet on the right number

find a flaw

No I meant didn't the casinos smarten up and cut the shoe in random places, use machines to shuffle, etc? Sorry I'm largely unfamiliar with the practice as such, just did it for fun at home ages ago. Do you get stressed when counting at the tables keeping track of the count or does it come pretty naturally after a while?

Heisenberg's uncertainty will probably fuck you over. As it does in most cases lol

Martingale strategy. you lose out in the end. dont gamble looking to make money, trust me

Not the original guy, but this is all probability, and if you are good at math, suggest you get a probability theory book.

We are going to assume that the decks are completely random and that we don't know how many decks are used.

Given this, you have to estimate the probability of getting certain cards given what's on the table already. If you good at calculating conditonal probabilities on the fly (I'm not) you should try it

Actually majored in math so no problem there. And I imagine you wouldn't even need to account for conditional probability directly, couldn't you just keep a base count of good vs. bad cards (add 1 whenever you see a face card, subtract for small cards, etc). I was more interested in the practicality of it all. Say they use a machine to shuffle after each round. Or they use a really long shoe and cut randomly. Was just under the impression that they are trying to make this extra hard now. Maybe I'm wrong.

No not professionally. But i used it to pay off my car and get debt free. It still works as long as its a classic shoe game. And not one of the continuous shuffle machines they keep putting cards back in after so many hands.

I use the classic high/low count, its easy to learn and has a decent playing efficiency. I like easy because i can drink and fit in with the ploppies eithout effort

>what is 0 and 00?
If you can find the rare and elusive European roulette with only a single 0 your odds are better, but still.

it's literally just a shift change. They take frequent breaks to stay sharp with the money.
t. casino employee

Martingale only works with an infinite stack. If you have infinite money, why the fuck are you playing gambling games to start with?

Do this but instead of playing roulette buy dips. Act like dips are losing and double down on every dip

That's not the reason at all. A whale can bankrupt the casino due to gamblers ruin.

That's why Casino's want people betting a shitton with the odds in their favour sobthey make consistent gainz

Somebody with 1 billion could fuck over a casino in no time without limits.

If he spread his money equally over 35 numbers on American roulette each time he wins the casino has to pay him 28.000.000$ (92% win chance)

There are infinite universes, and infinite versions of you

Make a promise with yourself to buy a lottery ticket and kill yourself if you don't win.

The only version of you that remains will be the millionaire version.

Now you're a millionaire.

> killing yourself for all infinity
shit user, sounds like some kind of Buddhist hell

Fucking this.

The green spots give the casino a 5% advantage. You don't notice cause you're a human and we aren't designed to compute these types of probabilities.

There's a reason casinos are incredibly glamorous. Because they make a fuck ton of money.

They are a business, and just like any other they are designed to transfer money from your pocket into their bank account.

those of us who dont gamble at casinos already know this.

What about all the versions that never make the promise in the first place. Still millions of beta cucks

You lose a 50/50 bet three times and you don't have 27.000 to keep it going

Trust me this does not consistently work and you will sooner or later lose all your money

>determinism
paying off the dealer to spin your numbers?