Was Egypt an African civilization?

I know this is a hotly contested issue, but there seems to be alot of cultural continuity with africa, and almost none with Europe and the middle east in regards to ancient Egypt. Let's take a look.

>Mummification- Surrounding african cultures also practiced mummification, but practically no mummies have been found north of Egypt, or at least no mummies of the same type.

>Circumcision, another practice that appears to have it's roots in africa

>Animism, you're beloved Pepe is african.

>Some of the hairdos and style of dress have remained largely the same ie. micro-braids.

>Little to no facial hair

>Afro-centric mapping with south Egypt being "upper", and North being "lower".


Also, in thier own words they were Ethiopian colonists.

There are more I know, but that's just off the top of my head, so what gives? How could they be European or even Arab and have so little in common with those people and cultures.

>inb4 that non-peer reviewed study of one grave site in lower Egypt from the Greek period. That uses concepts like sub-saharan, yet only uses one tribe to define sub-saharan. Also ignoring the fact that the Nile traverses both and the Sahara was much greener than it is today.

Other urls found in this thread:

nature.com/articles/ncomms15694
twitter.com/AnonBabble

WE

>Afro-centric mapping with south Egypt being "upper", and North being "lower".
This is because the Nile flowed from south to north.

WUZ

african yes, black no

KINGZ

Doesn’t the mummy of Ramses II have red hair and a Roman nose?

They weren't black or white, they were their own race. Egyptians clearly depicted actual Africans as very different from them.

But they had some sub-saharan DNA, and thus were black.

Notice how some of the Nubians are the same color as the Pharaoh.

>some
key word here

t.amerimutt

No. Egyptians are Eurasians who came from the Levant.

But black Americans have some sub-saharan DNA and are considered "black".
>One drop rule
>logical consistency

The guy on the right is Egyptian. Both of Steph Curry's parents are "black".

...

Look at your own map. Egypt is lighter than Ethiopia and Nubia while sharing tone with parts of Greece, Italy and the Levant.

>>One drop rule
/pol/ is not an authority of anthropology/sociology

This is a map for E1b1b1a1. Rameses was E1b1a.

The one drop rule was official and unofficial policy of the US, can't blame /pol/ for this one

It's retarded, there are NO humans who don't have African dna, so by the "one drop rule", there are no white people.

bump

Save your breath.

>Was Egypt an African civilization?

Holy shit, it doesn't fucking matter. Egypt was Egypt. Stop projecting modern race relations onto a civilization from five thousand years ago.

WE

WUZ

The average Greek or Italian is blond nordic now?

Egypt is geographically African, culturally Middle Eastern, and racially Mediterranean.

None of that matters tho because nationalism is dumb

This. Americans have a disease and they are infecting the whole world.

SJWs, muh heritage /pol/tards, Affirmative Action, Black history day, quotas, diversity, Trump's wall, you are all fucking INSANE

OBSESSED

It's true. All this racial obsession shit is coming from the Americans' escalating mental breakdown.

this

>Culturally middle Eastern

They said in their own words they came from Ethiopia.

Even IF that were true, does it change the fact that Egypt is culturally Middle Eastern?

Nope just blond not Nordic.

This guy speaks the truth.

What would make you think all africans are pitch black, and pitch black congoids are the only african phenotype?

Why do white supremacists get so mad at the though of people without cotton white skin producing/ruling a Civilization?

They have a deep seated inferiority complex.

Not only the color, they exagerated subsaharian features, different from themselves.

Look like some bug-eyed Asian/Nubian/ gremlin. The lips are a little noggish, but who knows. My bet is they were all short. Tallnese gene seems to come from anglo-barbarian roots. Maybe a tad orange, but definitely not shitskinned.

Northern euros have a long history of trying to wewuz Mediterraneans. Now black americans do the same, in their minds the current North Africans and Egyptians are all arab invaders, even when DNA proves them wrong.

le epik meme XD XD XD XDDDD!!!!

>Shows a greek

Copts aren't greek Ja'Tavious, they're christians just like Ethiopians and basically egyptians without Islam.

WE

They weren't "culturally middle eastern" until they got their culture raped out of them by the arab invasions.

they had much less then than they do now, ironically

I remember reading that the pressure for converting to Islam was more intense in recent centuries.

>typical Europoor projection

>>>
>>
>

They were kind with him in the portraits considering how physically fucked up he was.

>"Black" only comes in one shade, pitch black

they were just happy that they had finally replaced hippy Moses with a real pagan

blacks didnt go past the stone age in any of their """civilizations"""
why would anyone think there is some magical exception?

>Because black civilizations were not monolithically only the most primitive of africans, like insecure whites attempt to imply.

There were plenty in east, and west africa that were into metallurgy.

those were the nubians, different race.

>Nubians are not black now
Just come out and say it. "I'm jealous of black Americans, so in an attempt at a passive aggressive slight, I will reduce the definition of "black" to only the most primitive Africans, then attach them to that label".

you just proved the whole point of the thread though. Those look like straight bongos. Would be considered a racist cartoon nowadays. Egyptians knew what groids were and depicted them differently.

You should stop pretending for once.

Black comes in a wide variety of shades and phenotypes, and the one drop rule dictates that alot of different peoples fall under the umbrella of "black".

They were a Mediterranean culture

Problem the slaves and other's in the bottom of the society were negroes, but the autocracy, priesthood and architects? Definitely not.

It was a civilization and it was in Africa. How is this a question?

The only true thing is they are not blond or related to north european

We be kangz do

nature.com/articles/ncomms15694

>Egypt, located on the isthmus of Africa, is an ideal region to study historical population dynamics due to its geographic location and documented interactions with ancient civilizations in Africa, Asia and Europe. Particularly, in the first millennium BCE Egypt endured foreign domination leading to growing numbers of foreigners living within its borders possibly contributing genetically to the local population. Here we present 90 mitochondrial genomes as well as genome-wide data sets from three individuals obtained from Egyptian mummies. The samples recovered from Middle Egypt span around 1,300 years of ancient Egyptian history from the New Kingdom to the Roman Period. Our analyses reveal that ancient Egyptians shared more ancestry with Near Easterners than present-day Egyptians, who received additional sub-Saharan admixture in more recent times. This analysis establishes ancient Egyptian mummies as a genetic source to study ancient human history and offers the perspective of deciphering Egypt’s past at a genome-wide level.

A recolorized blurry photo in an american textbook? Okay lets just throw out all this dna evidence since you feel you already know the truth.

b8

There's no such a thing as a black race or a white race, it's just an anglo/american invention for political purposes

There are different phenotypes like bantu, congoid, and the explicitly different and separate khoisan. Same for caucasoids ans mongoloids

Only amerishits believe in a "white race" that, ironically, magically changes its definitions from time to time including all people from "Europe" (also continuously modified according political stuff) and even including people who are not and do not consider themselves european (as the Kalash). And all this retardation is projected unto other "colors" creating meaningless terms like "black race" or "yellow race" which they force and promote in the world

Amerishits should be exterminated from the surface of Earth

>I know this is a hotly contested issue
lol, only if you're an insecure American. Everybody knows ancient Egyptians weren't nignogs, they were more related to other people from the near east than they were to Nubians/Ethiopians. The negros claiming descent from Egyptians aren't even from the same region as Egypt, but I guess Americans think "blacks = all of Africa" "whites = all of Europe" "arabs = all of middle east" etc.

Yah, americans are cancer

Egyptians were African. There was sub saharan Egyptian admixture, there were North Africans, some Arab migrants, etc.

Ancient Egypt certainly had black people and many of their pharaohs were post amara and possibly pre were unmistakably "black" as well. Nubian dynasty was straight up black as well.

The real questions is: Who the fuck cares? Why are Americans so obsessed with race in an ancient civilization that didn't use those concepts in a non superficial way?

Well, it's not in Europe or the Middle East so... yes.

WE

The funny thing is that amerimutts unironically believe they're doing good to the world by exporting all this cancer and can't believe or understand the fact that nobody likes them

I know it's hip and all to shit on Americans, but hopefully you do realize that Egyptian wewuzzers constitute a small minority even amongst American blacks. Most blacks think they're pretty cringeworthy.

Egyptians were an offshoot or proto-meds from Anatolia who had mixed with native Natufians, so he is correct in a sense.

Of*

Upper and Lower Egypt is based on the geography of the Nile, not the continent

>>"Black" only comes in one shade, pitch black

Say mixed race "Afro Americans" who are light skinned because they are 5% Chereooke 10% Spanish and 5% French

>there are NO humans who don't have African dna, so by the "one drop rule"
I took a DNA test and had 0 african dna you nigger. i’ve seen others who did as well.

>>Afro-centric mapping with south Egypt being "upper", and North being "lower".
Upstream you daft cunt.

This.

"BIG"

>Most blacks think

>proto-meds
you can't really call neolithic Anatolians the first or original meds at all, thousands of years separate the populations.

medicist cancer I swear, pic related

lol

>have so little in common
That's not quite true of European culture, in so far as ancient Greece and the Minoans were heavily influenced by Egypt. The fact that Bedouins are the closest modern genetic analogues for ancient Egyptians makes me doubt your claim about Arab culture too.

Besides that, E came out of Eurasia into Africa.

>E is a clade of Haplogroup DE, with the other major clade, haplogroup D, being exclusively distributed in Asia.
>DE is a clade within M168 with the other two major clades, C and F, considered to have a Eurasian origin.
>After an initial Out-of-Africa migration of early anatomically modern humans around 125 kya, fully modern human E-carrying males are thus proposed to have back-migrated from the paternal haplogroup's place of origin in Eurasia around 70 kya along with females bearing the maternal haplogroup L3, which is also thought to have originated in Eurasia. These new Eurasian lineages are then suggested to have largely replaced the old autochthonous male and female African lineages.[3]

reminder that cognitive/behavioral modernity is ~40,000 years old

>red ochre may have been mixed with water or oil and applied to the skin to protect it from the harsh climate.

Natufians unrelated?

>According to one theory,[23] it was a sudden change in climate, the Younger Dryas event (c. 10,800 to 9500 BC), that inspired the development of agriculture. The Younger Dryas was a 1,000-year-long interruption in the higher temperatures prevailing since the Last Glacial Maximum, which produced a sudden drought in the Levant.

>According to ancient DNA analyses conducted by Lazaridis et al. (2016) on Natufian skeletal remains from present-day northern Israel, the Natufians carried the Y-DNA (paternal) haplogroups E1b1b1b2(xE1b1b1b2a,E1b1b1b2b) (2/5; 40%), CT (2/5; 40%), and E1b1(xE1b1a1,E1b1b1b1) (1/5; 20%).[19] One Natufian individual was also found to belong to the N1b mtDNA haplogroup and two others belonged to the J2a2 mtDNA haplogroup.[29] In terms of autosomal DNA, these Natufians carried around 50% of the Basal Eurasian (BE) and 50% of Western Eurasian Unknown Hunter Gather (UHG) components. However, they were slightly distinct from the northern Anatolian populations that contributed to the peopling of Europe, who had higher Western Hunter Gatherer (WHG) inferred ancestry. Natufians were strongly genetically differentiated[30] from Neolithic Iranian farmers from the Zagros Mountains, who were a mix of Basal Eurasians (up to 62%) and Ancient North Eurasians (ANE). This might suggest that different strains of Basal Eurasians contributed to Natufians and Zagros farmers,[31][32][33] as both Natufians and Zagros farmers descended from different populations of local hunter gatherers. Mating between Natufians, other Neolithic Levantines, Caucasus Hunter Gatherers (CHG), Anatolian and Iranian farmers is believed to have decreased genetic variability among later populations in the Middle East. The scientists suggest that the Levantine early farmers may have spread southward into East Africa, bringing along Western Eurasian and Basal Eurasian ancestral components separate from that which would arrive later in North Africa.

>No affinity of Natufians to sub-Saharan Africans is evident in the genome-wide analysis, as present-day sub-Saharan Africans do not share more alleles with Natufians than with other ancient Eurasians.[19]

Most Americans just don’t give a shit anymore, they look at Sweden and say “yeah, we all knew that they like happen” but still hate racists.