Product of late capitalism?

...

...

...

...

...

Hahaha

...

In a true socialist society that lardass wouldn't be fat in the first place.

Did you know that over 2000 nuclear bombs have been detonated since 1944?

Because he would be starving? Good job comrade

>late capitalism

>USSR has an army about 4 times bigger than the allies by the end of WW2
"Why did the UK let Poland fall under communism ?Clearly they're working for ze joos"

based hedonist

>implying Soviets would have been able to fight the Allies between 1945-1950
>implying Allies shouldn't have taken the risk and attacked them

The allies would have gotten steamrolled in weeks, all of europe would have been red

Operation unthinkable had this name for a reason

Oh yes

>Soviet economy was severely damaged
>Their manpower was absolutely depleted
while Americans lost almost nothing compared to them, worst case scenario, British could have unleashed hordes of Pajeets on Soviets. Of course, we can't tell what would happen if they tried getting Indians in en mass, however there was a possibility of that happening
>Allied air supremacy
>Nuclear weapon
>German POWs
This one is another longshot, but western allies had nearly 3 milion captured battle experienced Germans, I suppose it wouldn't be all that hard equiping them to fight the Reds once more. Similiar thing what Germans did with Vlasov.
>Allied control of the sea
>Poland
Now, Poland was just recently """liberated""" from the Germans, however many Poles still remembered 1939 and 1920's. Some kind of Polish anti Soviet resistance would be expected.

All those factors combined, we can figure that Soviets would get stomped, especially in 1945-1948 period. Stalin knew it pretty well but he took the risk and it paid off. Now, I am not claiming that I am absolutely correct, I am just stating my opinions so please don't kill me.

With exsisting forces in Europe in March 1945, if the Soviets decided to keep going west, they werent being stopped.

I don't have to argue with you because the British themselves came to the same conclusion when they studied the matter

Allies had nuclear weapons they could easily have won a war against soviet union. Soviets were almost out of man power to the point they were recruiting from gulags by the end of the war while americans had barely lost what 300k men, while having an even larger population.

>>With exsisting forces
There's the rub. The US could always commit more men, the British Commonwealth could bring in pajeets, and there were some 3 million or so German POWs who could be pressed into service as well if it came right down to it.

>Their manpower was absolutely depleted
meme
>British could have unleashed hordes of Pajeets on Soviets
Because mass consciption of the peasant population to fight in wars that have nothign to do with their country always worked well
>Allied air supremacy
doesnt exist
>Nuclear weapon
not useful until they put them on rockets
>German POWs
>Poland
Because first thing you want to do after finaly defeating your greatest enemy after 7 years of war that killed about 4 milions of your people is to join them and fight on their side.
>what is public opinion
>what is UK HQ response to Churchills plan

Here’s how that would go. The Soviets would advance until their supply lines ran thin and they bled for every inch of ground due to allied air superiority (which the west would have). We push back slowly until nukes come into play, and then we glass Russia into submission.

...

This isn't HoI 4,user

>comrade
>socialists
5000 people clapped at this post.

Allies would have air superiority though. Nukes would be used too.

this isnt HoI IV