The north had more casualties.
Who really won the civil war?
Michael Clark
Charles Ortiz
But the South lost more men in proportion since they were so outnumbered.
>Who really won the civil war?
The globalists by stopping secession so they could get a step closer to globalization. The abolitionist movement was a global one and the South had come to be unique as one of the few places with nigger slavery and free whites. Making an example out of the CSA as no more real secession attempts did away with America staying true to its original principles in favor of despotism.
Isaiah Thomas
>Making an example out of the CSA as no more real secession attempts did away with America staying true to its original principles in favor of despotism.
>fighting for slavery is considered fighting against despotism now
Liam Campbell
The jews
Cooper Russell
Nobody won
Grayson White
You're right. The nazis royally won ww2 because the Soviets had more casualties. Silly me, I thought the USSR won due to the lack of Germany existing afterwards
Much like how the south stopped existing as a sovereign power, completing the war goal of the north, solidifying victory you stupid fucking dixiefaggot
Owen Cooper
Casualties do not mark victory, objectives do. The victor is whoever got what they fought for. Not to say casualties aren't often related to victories.
Cameron Price
>less casualties means south won
Justin Martin
Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union seeing as both came into existence as an inadvertent result of that war.
Joseph Ortiz
The US was friends with the Tsar though, how did they cause the USSR?
Chase Rogers
Elaborate on this meme please
Oliver Adams
Hillary had more votes and she won. This is objective truth
Blake Adams
Rothschilds supported the Confederacy to check the growth of the United States and secure a British ally on the continent.
Ian Campbell
>war is about getting the most kills possible
Adam Adams
God Lincoln was a tall bastard
Ian Morris
No they didn't, if they did then Britain would have joined in the war to fuck over the US which would have been a lot easier with a civil war going on since it didn't work in the revolution or the war of 1812. Secession movements are a big no no cause they make more countries divining people which is the opposite of globalism.
Adrian Mitchell
Nicholas Bennett
>Who really won the Vietnam war?
>Who really won WW2?
Angel Barnes
The did join in the war. The bongs built Confederate warships and supported them at sea, for which they paid the US reparations after the Civil War. The bongs also supported an incursion into Mexico, which the US threatened with armed action following the Civil War.
Henry Perry
What? One doesn't exist and the other does, this isn't even a question unless you mean who benefit the most? In which case northern industrialists and republican politicians won while most others only indirectly benefit or were harmed by the war. Some slaves benefit a lot as well while others had a more mixed bag.
Brayden Sanchez
That was private British shipbuilding interests, not the government and had not significant impact on the war.
The bit about Mexico is also totally misguided.
history.state.gov
en.wikipedia.org