Are the Brits the most responsible for WW2?

Are the Brits the most responsible for WW2?
Glad they lost their empire in the process.
>The Naval Pact was signed in London on 18 June 1935 without the British government consulting with France and Italy, or later, to inform them of the secret agreements which stipulated that the Germans could build in certain categories more powerful warships than any of the three Western nations then possessed.
>As an additional insult for France, the Naval Pact was signed on the 120th anniversary of the Battle of Waterloo, at which British and Prussian troops defeated the French army of Napoleon.

>virgin vs chad

That would be France. Overly harsh reparations for WWI were entirely France's fault.

>Lost their empire
America is just the contiuation of the Anglo world conquest.

No, the Germans are.
>sign a treaty after getting the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia
>break the treaty and invade Czechoslovakia anyways
>ask Poland for their land
>they refuse cause why the hell would they trust you at this point
>invade Poland, who has a defensive alliance with France and Britain that you know about
>France and Britain declare war on you
>declare war on Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Denmark without provocation
>ask for a peace treaty with Britain
>they refuse because your treaties aren't worth the paper they're written on

And the Brisith played a huge part in all of these, by allowing Germany to grow more powerful. They're the one who abandonned the Sudetenland in the first place, which made impossible any kind of alliance with the USSR.

People simply do not understand the Anglo global hegemony. Instead of a directly-ruled Empire, there is now a nebulous federation of like-minded nations, who, when under a common threat, militarily or culturally, will federate to eliminate that threat.

Who leads this federation, Britain or America, is irrelevant. The Anglo core principles are what matter.

> England is responsible for what every other country does

I think Veeky Forums might be the only place on the internet where people are stupid enough to believe that declaring war is the same as starting war.

Anglos smell of feces and body odor

the french abandoned all these guys too??

Anglos invented the toilet, deodorant, and water-treatment plants.

Face it, José. You live in an Anglo world.

The thing is, the french can't face Germany alone, and knew it.

>Anglos invented the toilet
And by toilet you mean the UK

So was Britain too aggressive or not aggressive enough in Veeky Forums's eyes? It's getting old now.

Britain fucked its own ally, violated the treaty of Versailles, and did it the anniversary day of Waterloo (a british-german victory against the french).
That was a clear dick move, no wonder the french morale was so low when the war started.

>be germany
>lol whoops we broke your treaty
>lol whoops we broke your treaty
>lol whoops we broke your treaty
>hey UK, want a treaty?
>uh.. no thanks, you sort of didn't stick to Munich or anything else we agreed
>80 years later
>REEE FUCKING ANGLOS SCUM OF THE WORLD

I don't get what this has to do with Britain being at fault for Nazi Germany, also I can't imagine anyone but a Frenchman typing this out, come on who gives a fuck what day a naval treaty was signed on.

Franch violated Versailles by invading the Rhineland.

As was said, WW2 is *entirely* France's fault. They reaped a whirlwind.

This just stinks of a salty Frenchman looking for someone to blame for the fact that France got steamrolled.

Fucking laughable that the Anglo-German naval agreement - an agreement which stipulated that Germany could build its fleet only to 35% of Britain's capacity - is being put forward as a reason for Britain's culpability fucking kek.

They didn't lose their empire because of WW2
Why are all naziaboos ameriretards?

Britain leniency with nazi Germany lead to the war. The naval treaty was just a sign; it meant Versailles was worthless and that Germany was free to not respect it anymore. France alone could not win against Germany, but Britain tried to play, once again, Germany against France, preventing them to take any preventive action. Then Britain decided to declare war in 1939, when France was not ready. The UK was basically expecting France to do just like WW1, lose an entire generation again for them.

imagine being this deluded.

The largest sign to Hitler that the Allies wouldn't act on the terms of the Treaty of Versailles was his ability to re-militarise the Rhineland with no punitive action from the French.

You're trying to spin the idea that we were in cahoots with Germany to try and get at France, an idea which is in of itself ridiculous and insults the British and French soldiers who fought and died together during the Fall of France.

> Britain leniency with nazi Germany lead to the war.
No, that would be Adolf Hitler's Germany.
If any fault should be put for Adolf Hitler's rise, it is France's demands for overly harsh Versaille reparations.

> it meant Versailles was worthless
Versailles was worthless the second French troops rolled into the Rhineland, expressly against the stipulations.

> Britain tried to play, once again, Germany against France
Why is this news to anyone? Britain has done this for two thousands fucking years. Preventing a European land hegemony is literally why Britain exists.

> Britain decided to declare war in 1939, when France was not ready
France would never have been ready.

Your arguments sound like some butthurt European, probably a Frenchman.

>British and French soldiers who fought and died together during the Fall of France.
British soldiers died in France? Most ran away. It's not like it mattered, the UK sent too few of them.
>Versailles was worthless the second French troops rolled into the Rhineland, expressly against the stipulations.
I've never read what the french did was illegal according to the Versailles treaty.

France occupied the Ruhr in 1923 expressly against international advice and law.

Literally caused Hitler and WW2.

>international advice
Yes.
>Law
No. It was perfectly legal according to the treaty of Versailles.

British troops that were fighting at the Dyle held their ground fairly easily, but were forced to retreat and eventually evacuate because of the breakthrough of French forces at Sedan.

>The Naval Pact was signed in London on 18 June 1935 without the British government consulting with France and Italy
This. Much like in the run-up to the Great War, the retarded bongs made a series of interlocking agreements that were: 1. completely retarded, 2. incentivizing others to act in retarded ways and 3. were executed discretely and well away from any scrutiny, as Perfidious Albion has always acted.

The one thing the retarded bongs did out in the open was to sell out the Czechs, while not even making them part of the discussion, reaffirming that even out in the open Perfidious Albion is morally degenerate.

Thankfully they're now contained to their containment island, and we have only to strip them of nukes before sharia is fully embedded.

I hate this, where people try to shift the blame for the second world war away from the Nazis.

You could argue all day about rather the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh or not, or rather the French were too harsh. But the decision to tear it up and thereby start a war goes to the Nazis. They could have just followed the conditions of the treaty, however, harsh without starting a war but they didn't. They were out for revenge pure and simple.

They wanted revenge against all those guilty of perceived wrong doings to them, like the British and the French for the treaty of versailles, the communists and Jews because of the stab and the back myth, etc.

>The Anglo-German Naval Agreement fixed a ratio whereby the total tonnage of the Kriegsmarine was to be 35% of the total tonnage of the Royal Navy on a permanent basis.
*takes deep huff of /int/ jenkem*
reeeeee fuck the brits for starting world war two

Surely there comes a point where even these bullshit pushing retards realise how pathetic their impotent rage is

>harsh reparations

>Ottoman gains in the North
Did they even managed to secure those territories?

Jesus Christ I knew Brest-Litovsk was harsh but I didn't know it literally entailed the entirety of the Ukraine being ceded to Aust-Hung.

But everyone will still say muh eternal anglo.