The reason why Africa is so poor is white colonization. In the past...

>Agriculture was invented in Ancient Egypt by Black people.

Agriculture was invented multiple times. The time in Egypt was not the earliest, and it was not done by black people. It was done by people who were similar to semitic people.

Around the Nok valley, black people invented agriculture later than this. This appears to be after R1b was introduced into the region, but it's hard to date the DNA stuff.

In New Guinea 'black' people invented agriculture around the same time as Egyptians.

Afro-centrists are mentally ill.

>The reason Africa is so poor is colonization.
No. Of course post-colonization Africa is under Western hedgemony.
The real problem is Africa's resource curse, """free trade""", and astroturfed wars (selone, liberia, DRC,....) African states are puppets of the global financial system.
Imperialism is the strongest it has ever been in Africa.

honkeycentrists are not huh?

>The richest kingdom was in Africa (Mali)

And here's the greatest building they were able to build when they were the richest country on Earth

Meanwhile 200 years earlier, a bunch of French monks lost in the Syrian desert built that...

And the without the French ruling Mali nobody would be able to see how it looked like irl, because nobody gave a fuck about upkeep.

>it's another historical materialist has only recent history in sight episode

>

/thread

Blacks have an inferiority complex. We should undertand that since they are the lowest race

whites are weak compared to blacks.

Me too. Exterminate the semen skinned race NOW!

>Also, sub-saharan african history general.
I am seriously interested by that. What is the history of Sub Saharian Africa? All I know is a couple of empire being less shitty than the usual, whites coming out of nowhere conquering all in no time and building everything and then a constant decay until the Chinks come in.

If your sperm is like that, go see a doctor because there is blood in it and you are going to die if you don't take the right medicine.

Wasn't agriculture invented between the black sea and the Caspian?

>Even humanity began in Africa. First humans were Black confirmed by scientists.

humanprogress.org/blog/how-africa-got-left-behind

the ((((scientists))) am I right?

>be the birthplace of humanity
>people move away from their homeland for some reason and somehow have their skin, hair and eye color change and end up looking nothing like how they did before
>be the birthplace of all the scientific discoveries, agriculture, music and song and cuisine
>other regions such as Rome, Greece, Assyria, Persia which aren't even on the continent had the same discoveries if not better considering all the intercontinental trading and wars which occurred
>supposed to be the original humans and the master race
>get subjected to slavery and humiliation by a bunch of Spanish and Portuguese sailors who were looking for spices
>to this day, rely on 1st World countries to save the population from constant outbreaks of poverty and disease and literally need to beg/demand to emigrate to countries where you're only tolerated because of muh poor 3rd Worlders.

I can't tell if this is embarrassing or humorous.

We build our cheap kak in red China when we should be building it in rainbow South Africa.

>This is why there are so many Blacks in Europe, American continent and other places of the world.

The blacks were sold by their own to the colonizers for guns and other goods, they weren't stolen and the Blacks were supposed to sent back after Lincoln freed the slaves but he was assassinated before the plan could come to fruition.
For Europe, most of the Blacks in the modern age are migrants from a few generations ago since it was only like 5 countries which partook in the slave trade and because of the guilt complex the Euros have, they're letting them stay instead of deporting them.

More like every day.

No its because blacks are stupid fucks.

Africans lived in mudhuts before we came and taught them civilization, then we left and they went back to their old ways. Thousand years from now they will still live in mudhuts and blame others for it

...

WE

Is there anyone of this board with an interest in what Negroes were up to outside of posting, "WE wuz kangs?"

It’s not like there’s much to study, nobody outside of ethiopia had a damned written language

Then what are the point of these threads where everyone makes the same joke over and over? I know the site I'm on, but it's weird.
>OP knowingly makes absurd claim
>Everybody knows this but still flocks to it just to jerking each off by saying "WE."

Worthless people with no identity that tries to find value in the stuff they inherited from their parents, instead of something created by themselves.

Cringe.

>you have to be an ethno-nationalist to enjoy shitposting
double cringe

>Worthless people with no identity
Shut the fuck up jew LOOK AT ME IM A JEW IM GOD'S CHOSEN SHAME ON YOU FOR HAVING A IDENTIFY BUT ITS FINE FOR ME BECAUSE IM A JEW.

>Ancient Egypt
>First civilization

Please kill yourself you uneducated pleb

>slightly

>I'll just pick this. Most blacks are too stupid to conceptualize the idea of farming even now
Without controlling for other factors, the average African-American in the US has an IQ of 85. That is the same IQ as America in the 70s.
Were Americans in the 70s too stupid to even conceive of agriculture?

t. Worthless people with no identity that tries to find value in the stuff they inherited from their parents, instead of something created by themselves.

Cringe.

Yes, but people tend to avoid shitposting generals like this one and aim for more specific Africa-oriented threads.

If you're looking for an introductory book, check out "The Fortunes of Africa" by Martin Meredith.

>BLACK Sea
More proof that Wakanda invented agriculture

Can you build this?
Half-truth. The original mosque likely fell into disrepair recently as one of the rulers in the area stopped caring about. The newer one was paid for by the French but built and designed by indigenous people living in Mali.

>half-true
Why do you have to be this contrarian man, I told this mosque would not stand if it were not for the French, which is true since they paid for it.

>you have to be an ethno-nationalist to enjoy shitposting

>Cringe.

>you have to be an ethno-nationalist to enjoy shitposting

Double cringe.

>That is the same IQ as America in the 70s
Not even close, if white americans were that stupid nothing would ever get that done in the U.S.

if you unironically believe this i believe you should be sent to extermination camps

>longest river in the world is in africa

Well you made it sound like the French built it and black people are just wewuzzing. I think its fair to point out the the upkeep on these structures can be abysmal but that's different from saying black people never had any civilization marvels at all which is what these threads tend to devolve into.

It has less to do with ethnicity and more to do with geography. The first civilizations (Egypt, Mesopotamia, Indus River Valley) were born in places that were 1) warm and 2) concentrated the entire population in a small area. Greece and Rome operated on similar principles and Rome especially greatly benefited from using an economic base located in a Mediterranean climate (Italy and later Spain) to conquer colder locations such as Gaul. Think about it: you KNOW that Italians, Greeks, Arabs, Africans, Mesoamericans, and Chinese are stupid, yet somehow they have these great civilizations. Its just geographical advantage.

Obvious bait aside, while thenwest definitely has a part of responsability in destroying Africa's economy by mass financial "aid" and constant undercuting of its production, I think the biggest problem they have to face is the tribe mentality that makes democracy in Africa a flight between rival tribes to get power over one another, its ridiculously easy for western powers to pour gasoline over the conflict and enjoy the aftermath.

Some parts of Africa seem to be developing in the way China developed now that China is offshoring jobs and industry there.

Which is why, as we all know, strong black civilizations completely wrecked and subjected weak white civilizations wherever the 2 met.

Lets say all of this is true, BUT why is the african nations struggling with basic functions of state today?

I always find it funny how Indians take credit for Indus Valley Civilization, even though vast majority of it, and the damn river is in Pakistan.

It's a bit same, when for example, there is anything about Macedonia on the internet; a video, news article, anything where you can leave comments.
Almost always most of the comments are from some Greeks saying "Alexander great was Greek"
"Macedonia is a province in Greece".
Don't you already have enough fantastic stuff to take credit for?
Can't you let a poorer, less fortunate country have something?
You fucking sub-humans.

For anyone who things that

"well that's all over now, why can't these countries develop?"

It's because they are still being exploited by the West.

>Corporations-foreign and domestic alike- report false prices on their trade invoices in order to spirit money out of developing countries directly into tax havens and secrecy jurisdictions. Developing countries lose $875 billion through trade misinvoicing a year.

>A similarly large amount flows out annually through " abusive transfer pricing", a mechanism that multinational companies use to steal money from developing countries by shifting profits illegally between their own subsidiaries in different countries.

>Jason Hickel, The Divide, 2017, Heinnemann, London

>Aid in reverse: how poor countries develop rich countries

>We have long been told a compelling story about the relationship between rich countries and poor countries. The story holds that the rich nations of the OECD give generously of their wealth to the poorer nations of the global south, to help them eradicate poverty and push them up the development ladder. Yes, during colonialism western powers may have enriched themselves by extracting resources and slave labour from their colonies – but that’s all in the past. These days, they give more than $125bn (£102bn) in aid each year – solid evidence of their benevolent goodwill.

>The US-based Global Financial Integrity (GFI) and the Centre for Applied Research at the Norwegian School of Economics recently published some fascinating data. They tallied up all of the financial resources that get transferred between rich countries and poor countries each year: not just aid, foreign investment and trade flows (as previous studies have done) but also non-financial transfers such as debt cancellation, unrequited transfers like workers’ remittances, and unrecorded capital flight (more of this later). As far as I am aware, it is the most comprehensive assessment of resource transfers ever undertaken.

>What they discovered is that the flow of money from rich countries to poor countries pales in comparison to the flow that runs in the other direction.

>In 2012, the last year of recorded data, developing countries received a total of $1.3tn, including all aid, investment, and income from abroad. But that same year some $3.3tn flowed out of them. In other words, developing countries sent $2tn more to the rest of the world than they received. If we look at all years since 1980, these net outflows add up to an eye-popping total of $16.3tn – that’s how much money has been drained out of the global south over the past few decades. To get a sense for the scale of this, $16.3tn is roughly the GDP of the United States

>What this means is that the usual development narrative has it backwards. Aid is effectively flowing in reverse. Rich countries aren’t developing poor countries; poor countries are developing rich ones.

>That’s 24 times more than the aid budget. In other words, for every $1 of aid that developing countries receive, they lose $24 in net outflows. These outflows strip developing countries of an important source of revenue and finance for development. The GFI report finds that increasingly large net outflows have caused economic growth rates in developing countries to decline, and are directly responsible for falling living standards.

We wuz kangz en sheet

WUZ

>Longest river in the world is in Africa

WRONG, that's the amazonas and is in South America

>First mathematicians, scientists and philosophers

Mathematicians: Yes, kinda

scientists: Nope that was on the fertile crescent

philosophers: lol, kys.

Based TURK

IQ is a normalized statistic, the mean score will ALWAYS be 100.

BUT...

when looking at RAW scores the mean has climbed steadily since it has existed.

go look up the "FLYNN EFFECT", the black-white gap has been steadily narrowing since the 30s.

What kind of monetary currents are you talking here anyways that are flowing from third into first world?
If he is talking about trade deficite, then they get stuff for the cash.
Is this text purpusely vague?

Except iq is not science, user.

LOL too true

the author of that image seems to think the united states engaged in the scramble for africa in any respect, that insults me more than anything, and I'd like to throttle them with my favorite walking stick

Well there's the illegal trade misinvoicing as seen in intellectual property regimes, tax avoidance, interest, repatriated profits, unequal labour,

theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2017/jan/14/aid-in-reverse-how-poor-countries-develop-rich-countries

this article explains a bit more, but the book is well worth a read too.

KANGZ

op

pakistan is an artificial construct invented by the british.

>No, its because of this other thing

only Portugal, Spain, the UK and France actually gained something from colonies

What was the point of the decolonization movement if Africa is still exploited like this?

>white colonization
You mean Jewish colonizaiton.

The greatest monuments they ever built vs a simple shack built by an illiterate farmer

The Nile is longer than the Amazon River. The claims that the Amazon is longer is nationalistic bullshit that gets touted by Brazilian scientists.

Italy, Belgium, Germany.
Many other European nations had small ass colonies for a short time, had notable ones but lost/sold them. many had trade/slave forts on the west coast.

On top of that even if you didn't have a colony everyone benefited from it various ways such as access to new stuff, more trade, scientific discovery, new places to migrate to even if it was to another nations colony and stuff like that.

Decolonization without revolution is meaningless, all it did was replace white porkies with black ones.

false. the first agricultural techniques were developed in mesopotamia, also known as the cradle of civilization. this is located in the middle east. the middle east is not part of africa you dumb fuck. if you bothered to use your brain for a minute you’d realize this. the whole WE WUZ KANGS bullshit is annoying. sub saharan africa has contributed nothing to civilization. the only great african society was the Mali empire which literally gave us gold and a tiny bit of trading. that’s all, you’re ignorant to think otherwise

And it's not going to change anytime soon, the extra resources from neocolonialism are the only thing keeping western society from total collapse. Plus, an Africa that was allowed to actually develop would no doubt show up on Europe/America's shores seeking payback in short order.

So that the exploiting nations could still plunder to their heart's content without their citizens getting the occasional pang of guilt over images of some tribe or other getting dynamite enemas every other week.

You know ours looks comfy as fuck

OP is right

You call him out for saying silly shit then say

>sub saharan africa has contributed nothing to civilization. the only great african society was the Mali empire which literally gave us gold and a tiny bit of trading. that’s all, you’re ignorant to think otherwise

what porkies. They aren't even "capitalistic" like said porkies. they are just gatekeepers to borrow the terminology.

it all used to be one country user, it astounds me the ignorance of idiots like you.

Cut down the cost
Really
Colonization wasn't financially positive. It was a money sink.
Now they have all the benefit of colonization without the duty that came with it. Short term smart move.

I can’t escape from your revisionism not even on /his, please stop with this unhistorical facts, and read a history book.

For Germany at least the colonies did not pay off at all finacially. Only Togo, which was a major rubber exporter brought a surplus for the national budget.

Ahhh,you are the same nigger that posts this shit on /pol/

You always get destroyed there.
I guess people on this board are just to stupid to refute you.
Thats why its your safe pace.

When the USSR does geopolitics its also called imperialism.

If the Africans were so mighty, then why did they lose to the Europeans?

Colonialism and contemporary corporate-state imperialism are related. Colonialism and de-colonialism set the initial ecological conditions within legal, econmic, and military systems. You can't understand for example liberia without understanding it's colonial history. Some of the hedgemonic power has shifted from states to private power, brokered by the state on behalf of "free enterprise".
Domination has diversified and now colonialism isn't necessary. it's more effective for empires to set up an autonomous state bureaucracy and dominate that than it is to expend the resources dominating the people directly and risking exposure.
Africa is liberal democracy'$ wet dream, free market 666 hail Exxon

This is part of the problem (see Chang's Bad Samaritans) but lets not overlook African failures. They cannot solely blame everyone else for their own problems.

Kill wh*Tes