Dumping some info that I had collected here 3-4 years ago. Feel free to post infographs or any other information that you think might help your fellow /fitizens. Please try and keep this thread informative/educational as opposed to the cancerous trash that has become the new norm here. If anyone has any contradicting evidence with anything, please contribute with sources to back your claim.
Info Dump General
Other urls found in this thread:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
higher-faster-sports.com
madcow.hostzi.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
madcow.hostzi.com
higher-faster-sports.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
en.wikipedia.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
bodyrecomposition.com
burnthefat.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
physsportsmed.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
bodyrecomposition.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
sportsci.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
madcow.hostzi.com
examine.com
ajcn.org
bodyrecomposition.com
jama.ama-assn.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ajcn.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
alanaragon.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
twitter.com
Lift fast for better strength gains
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Multiple sets give more hypertrophy/strength gains, optimal ~3
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Shorter rests don't help muscle gains
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Rest of ~3-5min best for strength gains
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Lifting causes hypertrophy in all muscle fibres
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy limited
>higher-faster-sports.com
>madcow.hostzi.com
Low reps for good hypertrophy & strength gains, esp as beginner
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Get stronger to get bigger
>madcow.hostzi.com
>higher-faster-sports.com
More volume is not always better
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Targetting upper/lower abs impossible
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Higher bodyfat leads to worse muscle gains
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Lifting on an unstable surface is retarded, dangerous and ineffective
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>en.wikipedia.org
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Work through DOMS
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
No spot reduction
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Cardio helps recovery
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Don't bother with HIIT
>bodyrecomposition.com
>burnthefat.com
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Exericse has similar positive benefits at all ages
>physsportsmed.org
Meal timing doesn't matter
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>bodyrecomposition.com
Fat won't make you fat, and will raise sex hormone levels
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Eating loads of protein is generally fine
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
But could potentially be harmful
Protein intake ~2g per kg BW
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>sportsci.org
Protein helps lose fat & fills you up
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Focus on g of protein, not % of your total kcal from protein
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Vegetables are good for you
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Eat traditional, healthy food
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Weight gain/loss is calorific deficit/surplus only, method doesn't matter
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>madcow.hostzi.com
>examine.com
Don't bother with keto
>ajcn.org
>bodyrecomposition.com
>jama.ama-assn.org
Contradicting evidence (keto may help)
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ajcn.org
GI doesn't matter
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>alanaragon.com
Weight loss = energy loss only:
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Visceral fat = death
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
That's all i've got boys, hoping others will dump some stuff as well.
bump
Don't really have anything to contribute but thanks for compiling all this.
Thanks for the compilation OP. Have a bump
jesus christ
thank you for this
this should be included into the sticky
going on pc to dump some infographics everyone had already seen.
you are doong God's work, OP.
Posts in sticky thread internally*
where did this short guy bullshit come from?
why do people think that just because you're short you're fucked?
I've got a buddy who's 5'7 and he's more of a clubfreak than I ever was. Guy has fucked his way through 100+ chicks and he's one of the nicest blokes I know. He's succesful with his business and he's just great in every way.
I can't see how height can stunt you in other ways than "oh shit, I can't reach the top shelf"
On the other hand, most 6'2+ guys I meet have this asshole way of just existing. Some succesful, some are not. But what's the point in bringing down people over their height? What's the point in creating insecurities in people over things they can't physically do anything about?
I'm not the tallest dude in the world either, I'm 5'11, but I haven't either encountered any issues with getting turned down over my height, I haven't been put in a situation where I'm other than "the best sex" just because of my height.
Fucking drop the bullshit, you lankie cunts, there's no point in bringing others down just because the one half-positive quality you have is that you can watch shit over wooden fences.
...
wrong thread my dude
...
Higher bodyfat leads to worse muscle gains
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
'Bulking' retards BTFO. Cut down to 10-12% and eat on a surplus SLOWLY to 15-16%
Repeat this cycle until you are dead. But for some magical reason idiots think NO NO IM BIG GOTTA EAT TO GET BIG BRO IM GAINING 10LBS A MONTH THATS GOTTA BE MUSCLE RITE? No, 9,5lbs of that is just fat-
>Shorter rests don't help muscle gains
Wew, I've been doing it wrong all along. Does it help for anything ? Like Stamina for example.
It helps with muscular endurance and work capacity, to an extent. Also potentially conditioning but that depends a lot on the lift in question.
...
...
Amazing thread but If I cant go to a gym and have only one 10kg dumbbell what can I do at home?
this is mostly for the bump. check the links guys
I see, so it's not that useless then. Thanks lad.
fitness is something you have to invest money in if you want faster results but I guess pic related is what you can do.
Whats the general consensus on myo-reps?
Does anyone have the google drive with all the pdf's?
I'll be nice and give you a bump. Good list
Pic unrelated
i might know what you are talking about but cant find it anywhere, sorry.
I don't mean to shit all over this thread because it's an extremely refreshing and welcome change from the usual useless day in day out bullshit on Veeky Forums, but 85%+ of the links posted are redundant of each other and otherwise completely obvious
Multiple sets are obviously better than single sets on a sliding downward curve of optimal gains. For maximum gain you'd lift 24 hours per day but the choice everyone makes is in how long is reasonable for them to train. It's redundant to suggest or analyse otherwise.
I'm surprised meal timing doesn't matter though, I've read at least 2 studies showing protein uptake is benefited nearer to post workout- and we know for certain glucose, particularly from high GI carbs is far more important immediately following resistance
Good work user
Bump jump thump
>Targetting upper/lower abs impossible
>>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>Among correct performers, CU produces greater activity on upper RA. For persons who have a high level of activity, PT is more strenuous than CU on lower RA. Among incorrect performers, either exercise indistinctly activates the muscle portions.
Doesn't it say the opposite?
ignore this guy, the nih is a meme