Info Dump General

Dumping some info that I had collected here 3-4 years ago. Feel free to post infographs or any other information that you think might help your fellow /fitizens. Please try and keep this thread informative/educational as opposed to the cancerous trash that has become the new norm here. If anyone has any contradicting evidence with anything, please contribute with sources to back your claim.

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16177617
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300012
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14971985
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19077743
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16095405
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19691365
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16686570
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18076244
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15705039
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17194236
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2311599
higher-faster-sports.com/nonfunctionalmyth.html
madcow.hostzi.com/Topics/Training_Primer.htm#Types_of_Hypertrophy:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12436270
madcow.hostzi.com/Topics/Training_Primer.htm#Training_and_Size_vs._Strength:
higher-faster-sports.com/strengthvssize.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16095427
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16503695
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19237506
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8976314
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21139562
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17530988
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18296960
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20072068
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_sense
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300023
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12617692
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21804427
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17596787
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19258659
bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/stead-state-versus-intervals-finally-a-conclusion.html
burnthefat.com/high_intensity_interval_training.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18379212
physsportsmed.org/doi/10.3810/psm.2011.09.1933
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11319656
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1905998
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9155494
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15085170
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8399092
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8383639
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21123467
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19943985
bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/meal-frequency-and-energy-balance-research-review.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15621063
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8942407
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14666150
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6538617
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6298507
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21722409
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9841962
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16174292
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10722779
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6390614
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19927027
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15640518
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22150425
sportsci.org/jour/9901/rbk.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19179060
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18469287
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14557793
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18448177
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20234038
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7494680
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19366466
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15699220
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18173383
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18025815
madcow.hostzi.com/Topics/Diet.htm
examine.com/faq/what-should-i-eat-for-weight-loss.html
ajcn.org/content/83/5/1055.long
bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/ketogenic-low-carbohydrate-diets-have-no-metabolic-advantage-over-nonketogenic-low-carbohydrate-diets-research-review.html
jama.ama-assn.org/content/289/14/1837.abstract
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16476868
ajcn.org/content/24/3/290.abstract
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16629877
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19602827
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17923862
alanaragon.com/elements-challenging-the-validity-of-the-glycemic-index.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16571861
drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzBFQE5OFXTUQjk2T2p4b3BRNVE
drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8iOSMfR-iXwOEJwOXFLbjVlUVU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Lift fast for better strength gains
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16177617

Multiple sets give more hypertrophy/strength gains, optimal ~3
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300012
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14971985

Shorter rests don't help muscle gains
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19077743
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16095405

Rest of ~3-5min best for strength gains
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19691365
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16686570
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18076244
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15705039
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17194236


Lifting causes hypertrophy in all muscle fibres
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2311599

Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy limited
>higher-faster-sports.com/nonfunctionalmyth.html
>madcow.hostzi.com/Topics/Training_Primer.htm#Types_of_Hypertrophy:

Low reps for good hypertrophy & strength gains, esp as beginner
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12436270

Get stronger to get bigger
>madcow.hostzi.com/Topics/Training_Primer.htm#Training_and_Size_vs._Strength:
>higher-faster-sports.com/strengthvssize.html

More volume is not always better
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16095427
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16503695
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19237506
Targetting upper/lower abs impossible
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8976314

Higher bodyfat leads to worse muscle gains
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21139562
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17530988

Lifting on an unstable surface is retarded, dangerous and ineffective
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18296960
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20072068
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_sense
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300023

Work through DOMS
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12617692

No spot reduction
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21804427
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17596787

Cardio helps recovery
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19258659

Don't bother with HIIT
>bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/stead-state-versus-intervals-finally-a-conclusion.html
>burnthefat.com/high_intensity_interval_training.html
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18379212

Exericse has similar positive benefits at all ages
>physsportsmed.org/doi/10.3810/psm.2011.09.1933

Meal timing doesn't matter
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11319656
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1905998
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9155494
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15085170
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8399092
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8383639
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21123467
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19943985
>bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/meal-frequency-and-energy-balance-research-review.html


Fat won't make you fat, and will raise sex hormone levels
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15621063
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8942407
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14666150
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6538617
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6298507

Eating loads of protein is generally fine
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21722409
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9841962
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16174292
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10722779
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16174292
But could potentially be harmful

Protein intake ~2g per kg BW
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9841962
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6390614
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19927027
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15640518
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22150425
>sportsci.org/jour/9901/rbk.html

Protein helps lose fat & fills you up
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19179060
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18469287
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14557793

Focus on g of protein, not % of your total kcal from protein
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18448177

Vegetables are good for you
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20234038
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7494680

Eat traditional, healthy food
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19366466
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15699220
Weight gain/loss is calorific deficit/surplus only, method doesn't matter
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18173383
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18025815
>madcow.hostzi.com/Topics/Diet.htm
>examine.com/faq/what-should-i-eat-for-weight-loss.html

Don't bother with keto
>ajcn.org/content/83/5/1055.long
>bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/ketogenic-low-carbohydrate-diets-have-no-metabolic-advantage-over-nonketogenic-low-carbohydrate-diets-research-review.html
>jama.ama-assn.org/content/289/14/1837.abstract
Contradicting evidence (keto may help)
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16476868
>ajcn.org/content/24/3/290.abstract

GI doesn't matter
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16629877
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19602827
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17923862
>alanaragon.com/elements-challenging-the-validity-of-the-glycemic-index.html

Weight loss = energy loss only:
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18025815
Visceral fat = death
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16571861

That's all i've got boys, hoping others will dump some stuff as well.

bump

Don't really have anything to contribute but thanks for compiling all this.

Thanks for the compilation OP. Have a bump

jesus christ

thank you for this

this should be included into the sticky

going on pc to dump some infographics everyone had already seen.

you are doong God's work, OP.

Posts in sticky thread internally*

where did this short guy bullshit come from?
why do people think that just because you're short you're fucked?

I've got a buddy who's 5'7 and he's more of a clubfreak than I ever was. Guy has fucked his way through 100+ chicks and he's one of the nicest blokes I know. He's succesful with his business and he's just great in every way.
I can't see how height can stunt you in other ways than "oh shit, I can't reach the top shelf"

On the other hand, most 6'2+ guys I meet have this asshole way of just existing. Some succesful, some are not. But what's the point in bringing down people over their height? What's the point in creating insecurities in people over things they can't physically do anything about?

I'm not the tallest dude in the world either, I'm 5'11, but I haven't either encountered any issues with getting turned down over my height, I haven't been put in a situation where I'm other than "the best sex" just because of my height.

Fucking drop the bullshit, you lankie cunts, there's no point in bringing others down just because the one half-positive quality you have is that you can watch shit over wooden fences.

...

wrong thread my dude

...

Higher bodyfat leads to worse muscle gains
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21139562
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17530988

'Bulking' retards BTFO. Cut down to 10-12% and eat on a surplus SLOWLY to 15-16%

Repeat this cycle until you are dead. But for some magical reason idiots think NO NO IM BIG GOTTA EAT TO GET BIG BRO IM GAINING 10LBS A MONTH THATS GOTTA BE MUSCLE RITE? No, 9,5lbs of that is just fat-

>Shorter rests don't help muscle gains

Wew, I've been doing it wrong all along. Does it help for anything ? Like Stamina for example.

It helps with muscular endurance and work capacity, to an extent. Also potentially conditioning but that depends a lot on the lift in question.

...

...

Amazing thread but If I cant go to a gym and have only one 10kg dumbbell what can I do at home?

this is mostly for the bump. check the links guys

I see, so it's not that useless then. Thanks lad.

fitness is something you have to invest money in if you want faster results but I guess pic related is what you can do.

Whats the general consensus on myo-reps?

Does anyone have the google drive with all the pdf's?

I'll be nice and give you a bump. Good list

Pic unrelated

i might know what you are talking about but cant find it anywhere, sorry.

drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzBFQE5OFXTUQjk2T2p4b3BRNVE

drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8iOSMfR-iXwOEJwOXFLbjVlUVU

I don't mean to shit all over this thread because it's an extremely refreshing and welcome change from the usual useless day in day out bullshit on Veeky Forums, but 85%+ of the links posted are redundant of each other and otherwise completely obvious

Multiple sets are obviously better than single sets on a sliding downward curve of optimal gains. For maximum gain you'd lift 24 hours per day but the choice everyone makes is in how long is reasonable for them to train. It's redundant to suggest or analyse otherwise.

I'm surprised meal timing doesn't matter though, I've read at least 2 studies showing protein uptake is benefited nearer to post workout- and we know for certain glucose, particularly from high GI carbs is far more important immediately following resistance

Good work user

Bump jump thump

>Targetting upper/lower abs impossible
>>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8976314

>Among correct performers, CU produces greater activity on upper RA. For persons who have a high level of activity, PT is more strenuous than CU on lower RA. Among incorrect performers, either exercise indistinctly activates the muscle portions.
Doesn't it say the opposite?

ignore this guy, the nih is a meme