Why is chinese history so hellish Veeky Forums?

define "soul"

myths invented by weak people so strong cannibals would not devour their hearts to gain magical powers

No that's from eating the hearts of dragons. Eating brains though gives you their memories.

It's RNH my man.

>magical powers
that's what savages believe, even barbarians are more cultured

*fights itself*

FH-227 flight survivors ate human flesh for 2 months and nobody ended up with "cannibal" diseases. in fact they became wendigo ubermensch but mass media obviously did not want to talk about that

>Not him
Savages are literally barbarians, tho.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prion

The rational spark of divinity that animates a creature

Mongol genes were boiling at this time.

Based

Don't break the masquerade bro.

Nice try, Reality Deviant.

A fuckton of people to throw at each other.

People are just extremely silly
>Chinese history is empires forming and crumbling over and over
That's human history.
>Chinese history is full of atrocities and death
That's human history.

Does anybody have the version of that image without the face? It's funnier when it's simply, IMO.

no, that's the japanese

This

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_cannibalism#Cannibalism_for_ideological_purposes

The absolute state of China

Take the history of, say, Britain, and compare it to China and tell me they are the same.

Whats more of a suitable devine punishment Veeky Forums?
>Hell
>being reincarnated as Chinese

The Chinese race lacks the morality we believe inherent in the Occidental man. The Chinaman only believes in one thing: money. He will not stop at anything to acquire it nor does he have any sympathy or remorse for those he cheats, robs or murders along the way. Only his autistic devotion to order stops him from turning on his fellow man and tearing him to shreds, and as soon as order starts to fail the consequences are catastrophic, leaving millions, if not tens of millions, dead. Thus the Chinaman will not hesitate to serve up his fellow man if it means he gets to live.

>saw Ravenous
Fucking hell, I thought I was the only one!

You're right, they aren't.

Bongs only had one shot in Empire and have long since declined.. Chinks always bounce back.

Large population in one state means large disasters happening and being recorded.

Europe in the Thirty Years War might have been the bloodiest place ever, but it wasn't one state.

Chinks are subhuman. In all seriousness, though, it’s probably because of your Western Bias (I think the same way, though).

>have a country the size of Europe
>long periods of peace and prosperity
>but absurd numbers of people die every time there's a civil war

There are tradeoffs when you get this big.

for eu

It's like 3 times the size of europe.

>have a country the size of Europe
Are you including all the seas and oceans around Europe in that? Cause there's no way Europe is even close to the size of China

That's unfair user, no one can rival the bongs in perfidiousness and cruelty.

Are there any good books about chinese history that aren't about the modern era?

Modern borders != borders for most of Chinese history

and even if they did, 95% of the population is focused in one much smaller area

>when you're so god damned dumb you literally go against evolution

not a proper use of that wojack, sir

>50, 000 dead on side A
>75,000 dead on side B
>status quo ante bellum
Speaking from an Asian perspective (Hong Cuck here), this is by far the most retarded aspect of European history. Especially in the Medieval Ages.

Like seriously, why can't Kingdoms conquer each other over there? Like the only great European conquest of the Medieval Ages are whenever Normans get bored and claim some land as their own. But everyone else just has this horrible wars and then call it quits.

>divinity

don't hit your head

The sheer scale of it. It's not particularly savage compared to pre-Christian Europe or MENA, but there are so many people in such a big country that a single province could experience drought and millions of people would die.

Nobody in Europe had the authority or might to start unifying Europe like Qin did to China in BC. Blobbing would have created a nightmare of various separatist movements with nobles glamouring to be lords of the lands now that their former lords were dead.

Catholic Church.
The right to rule was in its basis set by God, everything else around medieval politics derive from this. This is okay when you got one state church, since then you just conquer your neighbor and have your church proclaim yourself as a rightful ruler of his land. But the issue in Europe was that the state church wasn't under the control of the state, but it was an outside institution, and Pope sure wouldn't let king of Castille take half of France. So the fights over land in Europe were mostly made up by the fights for the right to rule (which was most easily obtained through inheritance). And also all the states of Europe being united under the Catholic Church also made politics way more intricate and complicated, plus add HRE and politics completely changing with the death of every minor duke and voilá, you got the incredible clusterfuck of European medieval politics.

Which also explains why Normans or Huns/Mongols were so successful (aside from their obviously superior battle tactics)
They were pagan and therefor didn't care about any other than iron right to rule

>you literally go against evolution
Not him but cannibalism can serve many evolutionarily-useful purposes for a population. It can increase the fitness of the species at the expense of certain (weaker) individuals, and can help avoid starvation in organisms
with boom/bust populations.

Most of which can be mitigated by cooking (just not prion-based diseases).

This!

>racial morality

>wojakwithdecreasedcranialvolume.traga