He ... millions

destroyed European nationalism and warped German identity in the coming decades for

Veeky Forums - Hitlet discussion (& Humanities LMAO based weed-infused perspectives xdd)

>he thinks industrialized warfare is good
>he doesn't think nations should return to a Homeric battle of champions to resolve conflict, the victor receiving tribute from the defeated

>he doesn't think nations should return to a Homeric battle of champions to resolve conflict, the victor receiving tribute from the defeated

You know what happened when the Japanese tried to fight the Mongols in their honorable 1v1 style?

They won?

He killed millions and didn't save shit

100 mills bullion.

"Single combats were characteristic of the Samurai fighting tradition and known as Ikki-uchi. As each samurai commanded his unit of retainers, successfully challenging and defeating the opposing samurai by a single combat can force the entire unit to retreat minimizing casualties and changing the course of battle. Those seeking a suitable opponent, frequently used Nanori to issue a challenge by announcing his name and bravery as well as ridiculing opponents to boost morale of his side as well as enrage the opponent to force the combat. As this is a high-risk-low-return strategy for the winning side, already defeated side, or ill-matched opponent (difference of personal standing or martial reputation) it was acceptable to decline or elude the single combat. An example of single-combat with the tragic result for the victor is told in Heike Monogatari as Kumagai Naozane defeated Taira no Atsumori at the Battle of Ichi-no-Tani."

The relevant part:

"It could be banned by the overall commander as needed and notably during Mongol invasions of Japan, particularly during the second invasion in 1281, samurai fought as massed mounted archer/warrior with the annihilation of enemy as the goal. This tradition declines and disappears during the Sengoku period as each side prepared trained armies in thousands or even tens of thousands making the single combat have a limited, if any, effect on the outcome of the battle."

divine providence literally smote the mongols?

Another relevant part:

"The invasions also exposed the Japanese to an alien fighting style which, lacking the single combat that characterized traditional samurai combat, they saw as inferior. This difference is noted in the Hachiman Gudōkun:

According to our manner of fighting we must first call out by name someone from the enemy ranks, and then attack in single combat. But the Mongols took no notice at all of such conventions. They rushed forward all together in a mass, grappling with any individuals they could catch and killing them.[46]

The Mongol method of advances and withdrawals accompanied by bells, drums and war cries was also unknown in Japan, as was the technique of Mongolian archers, which involved shooting arrows en masse into the air rather than long-ranged one-on-one combat. The Zen Buddhism of Hojo Tokimune and his Zen master Bukko had gained credibility beyond national boundaries, and the first mass followings of Zen teachings among samurai began to flourish."

I'm talking about the literal battles that took place on Japan itself. What does kamikaze have to do with this?

All I'm talking about (the user who brought up single combat) is that it's a better, highly idealized form of warfare as compared to 20th century industrial conflict which claims the lives of millions, often those who do not have a chance to fight back

you brought up the samurais m8

They still won though sooo...

he raped millions

slaughtered

Shaved

.>

They borrowed millions

To loot billions

saved

Proof?

>I do sympathize with his early movement, until his aggressive expansionism got out of control.
l
ol, if you do indeed sympathize with his early movement, then you should know, that his expansionism was the way how to protect europe from bolshevism, go to Veeky Forums and ask for some books

he jewed millions from jews

Ah yes, the greatest tactic to fight Bolshevism - invade a menagerie of capitalist countries and split Eastern Europe with the Soviet Union.

Truly, Hitler was a master.

>and split Eastern Europe with the Soviet Union.
That's a funny way to say "Invade with a united Europe behind you"

Tried(and sadly failed) to save millions

>the greatest tactic to fight Bolshevism

the smartest, or how to not fight on two fronts, which collapsed later
if he would stopped with austria, then france and other countries would have time to prepare for the war.
he didnt want to fight britain - submitted dozens of peace treaties and literally let germany being bombarded for three months
what exactly happened in dunkirk? Didnt he stopped his army for two days? Why would he do that? He could just slaughter them and didnt have to deal with them later... but today you hear that he stopped because he was worried of france attacking from the flank - bullshit, he just let them go

he jewed the jews out of millions

he jewed millions of jews

He's laughing as if he saved Millions.
--------------------------------------------------
Check out His new Volks Wagen.
A Jew car lot was asking for 40.
But he jewed 'em down to 20.
---------------------------------------
Pip pip Jolly good Cheerio

>he didnt want to fight britain - submitted dozens of peace treaties and literally let germany being bombarded for three months
Hitler's peace offers were not worth shit given his track record. He had burned too many bridges to get where he was in 1939.
The British gave him the chance to pull out of Poland, but this was ignored. Stalin trusted Hitler's offers, and look how he was rewarded.

Hermann Göring’s WWII Volkswagen Beetle for $525,000
gearheads.org/volkswagen-beetle-for-525000/

In reality, it was Von Rundstedt and Kluge who ordered the advance on Dunkirk halted, primarily because the advancing tanks had overextended themselves, the terrain was marshy, the armor was valuable and still needed for the final assault on France, and Göring had assured Hitler that his Luftwaffe could deal with the stragglers on the beach.