They were able to list tons of ERC20 tokens with no problem. Then suddenly REQ which is also an ERC20 gets a 2x deposit bug? This bug is so easy to detect.
Can we even get an explanation on why REQ had a 2x deposit bug while other ERC20 tokens didnt? I can't see this happening unless they deliberately wanted to manipulate prices.
>This bug is so easy to detect
retard kys
clearly this isn't an instance of
double coinValue *= 2;
>they deliberately wanted to manipulate prices
DING DING DING
that's a bingo!
Faggot, then explain how theyve been listing a lot of ERC20 tokens then suddenly a highly anticipated ERC20 tokens gets a x2 deposit bug?
Go on explain how. I'll understand if this coin had its own blockchain, but its a fucking ERC20 token. They successfully listed ERC20 tokens multiple times with no problem.
Fucking idiot.
it's pretty impressive that they didn't have some sort of transactional updates, which should prevent this from happening
you have no idea how complex, nested and at the same time modular coding something is, do you?
this was basically internal miscommunication when committing change to the code.
why do non-coding faggots insist on talking about shit they know nothing about?
>lets just run code on a live exchange without testing it
wew
> why do non-coding faggots insist on talking about shit they know nothing about?
Kek do you really want to defend binance with such a shitty bug? No developer will take you seriously. Even a fucking unit test should have detected this.
Again, HOW. THE. FUCK. DID. OTHER. ERC20. TOKENS. GET. LISTED. PROPERLY.
Dont tell me they manually code the backend for every fucking ERC20 token. That makes things even worse! GO ON BRAINLET. EXPLAIN.
How the fuck am I supposed to explain when I don't have access to their code you dumbass. There are literally a million ways this could have happened.
But on on, keep your retard conspiracy which just shows how little you understand how tech works. Makes me realise how retarded most investors are. Now I know how so much people lose money in this ez pz baby market.
> How the fuck am I supposed to explain when I don't have access to their code you dumbass
Yet you're fucking defending them despite the obvious fact that this should have been easily prevented. Hello? Basic testing.
How the fuck can you rationalize other ERC20 tokens being listed properly and REQ having a 2x bug? Don't tell me they implement new backend logic for every ERC20 token.
You're a dumbass and if you were a software developer working for me I would fire you.