Why didn't Brazilian Indians build stone structures like the Aztecs, Incas, or Mayans?

Why didn't Brazilian Indians build stone structures like the Aztecs, Incas, or Mayans?

homo erectus dont build palaces

no stone in the rainforest

Better wood, same as the pacific nw indians

They had plenty of good wood. They still managed to build cities in the Amazon.

Why didn't Scandinavians? They had plenty of trees, and making things out of a tree is easier than doing so out of a stone. Also didn't they find a lost city on the Amazon that had stone walls?

They were mostly hunter-gatherers.
Low population density = No cities

No. They maintained a less intensive agrarian based lifestyle except few tribes in Brazil. After diseases arrived, most abandoned such places if they didn't die.

Low iq. Still above Sub-Saharan Africa in terms of achievements.

Amerindians had a higher development rate though.

This. The Lost City of Z is fairly well known.

It literally isn't. Mostly because nobody gives a fuck about the Amazon.

...

Go back to pol

Are you saying they don't have low IQ, or that their achievements are smaller than those of sub-Saharan Africans?

He's saying go back to /pol/ with your racebait retardation.

Few reliable sources of stone while wood is plenty and strong enough.

I'm not the guy who made the claim FYI. I'm just wondering, if those things are correct why should he leave?

Nah it probably means that Amerindians have more civilization potential than europeans.

Wasn't he comparing Amerindians with Blacks rather than with Europeans?

See

That's what he said.

See

Never has a city been actually found in the Amazon. The legend of the golden cities in the rainforest came from the Andes, not even from the actual jungle natives.