>morality is subjective
Then by knowing that, you should understand that criticizing another's moral opinion with your own would contradict your position
>but it is MY moral opinion that their ideal is incorrect
And why do you think that your opinion is better than theirs?
>because it was how I was raised
Why did your guardian raise you in that way?
ect..
Tried not to strawman, but can someone give me some more sides or arguments to this problem? Brainlet btw
One way to attack it is to point out that even if it's subjective, and you think your opinion is the right one, it doesn't mean it isn't worth discussing with other people why x is better than y. Even if the moral "basis" is completely arbitrary, you and another person may share the same basis while having different experiences and knowledge leading to different moral positions.
Two people can be hedonists yet have different opinions on why their way to enjoy life is the best.
you can also attack them for being a fedora and not realizing morality comes from God
>You can attack them for saying morality is subjective by saying morality is subjective
hurrrr durrr
If two people come to an agreement, then do they then find a third, then a fourth and so on until their becomes a total agreement?
This implies that God created the law, which makes it arbitrary. If God actually IS the law or the morality came before God, then it isn't arbitrary.
>>morality is subjective
sure, but my metamoral standards are objective and can be applied universally to all beings and throughout space and time :^)
>And why do you think that your opinion is better than theirs?
Because my own beliefs are better than everyone else's until you can prove that my beliefs are lacking.
Relativism is asserted absolutely, and yet it has no justification for doing so, so why can't I assert an absolute standard by which to judge reality and be just as valid? And if both are equally valid, why wouldn't I assert my values, unless I believe my values are weak and cannot stand up to comparison with others?
>And why do you think that your opinion is better than theirs?
Because my opinion benefits me more than yours does
Morality aims at maximal objective utility, but it is ultimately based in the subject. Therefore a functional morality reconciles objective aims with subjective desires.
>Morality aims at maximal objective utility
speak for yourself
What the fuck does that pseudo scientific Myers Briggs claptrap have to do with anything, or, for that matter, that idiotic circle? Philosophy is not morality, neither is metaphysics, etc.