>the war of northern agression
The war of northern agression
Other urls found in this thread:
Reminder the Civil War was a banker's war
The north literally invaded the south to conquer it
The south literally attacked federal troops
That were illegally on its territory.
prove it
>be the south
>secede so you can keep whipping niggers
>open fire on a northern-held fort
>hurr why is the north being mean to us sad faic :-(
Southern aristocrats loved their niggers so much they were willing to betray their Republic by allying with London bankers. Nowadays their 19th century propaganda is parroted by the descendants of the people they conned into fighting for them...
>Country C secedes from country A
>Country A and its agents are now foreign to country C
>As a sovereign, it has the right to expel foreign agents
>Country C secedes from country A
>Country A and its agents are now foreign to country C
>As a sovereign, it has the right to expel foreign agents
the confed was never sovereign
Why, because that would collapse your narrative about how the Union dindu nuthin?
Nigger, both sides indebted themselves fighting each other. The only winner from the Civil War was the Rothschild family. Jesus Christ, the assassinations of Lincoln and JFK were paid for by the same cabal
because they did not have a state.
Yeah they did, it was called the Confederate States of America.
Seccession was illegal, which meant the confederate government was occupying U.S territory :^)
>Secession was illegal
Not him but at the time it was a legal grey zone, previously only SC had threatened it to Jackson. We all know how he responded
>Any country agreeing to succession
You'd have to be a brainlet.
>Seccession was illegal
This is a modern retcon, there was no law saying it was either legal or illegal. The US revolutionary war on the other hand was explicitly illegal.
There's plenty of reasons why secession could be beneficial to both parties.
literally every war is a banker's war, the point is to fight for whoever is less of a shitnigger
Yeah but America was an emerging empire. It had nothing to gain from opening the door to succession.
So don't lie and say it was a civil war then. It was clearly a war of conquest and future historians who exist apart from the cultural influences the conflict brought will see it that way.
It was a civil war because it was war between the citizens of one sovereign state
No it wasn't, we already went over this
Your argument as to why it was illegal was brainletposting
I've heard claims that there was a political movement in the south to abolish slavery, or at least the politicans were discussing it. Is this true and is there any name I can look into?
t. Someone who dislikes slavery but also think the world would have been better if large states like the American Federal one were broken up long ago.