Why didn't anyone just shoot him?

Why didn't anyone just shoot him?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assassination_attempts_on_Adolf_Hitler
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20_July_plot
twitter.com/AnonBabble

somebody did

I’ve also wondered this myself. For being one of the most hated man on the planet you would have thought many would have tried to kill him. And yet take the example of someone who used to give to the poor and needy just 2000 years before and they nailed him to the fucking cross.

really makes you think.

A few tried just didn’t pan out

The Allies had a few plans in place, with the British having one as late as 1944 called Operation Foxley. That one was called off though, due to the realisation that Hitler was a complete maniac, and having him in control of Germany was actually helping the Allied effort. The Brits were worried that, if he was assassinated, he would be replaced by someone competent.

He survived something like 40 assassination attempts.

Because back then peopke werent stupid enough to believe that something as big ad a war could not be a responsability of one guy. Especialy one who shows his face

There were numerous attempts on Hitler's life.

they were too dumb or Hitler was too smart, there are some speculations about his IQ, some say he was certainly profoundly gifted

because he did nothing wrong

>some say he was certainly profoundly gifted
Who exactly?

David Irving

He was a zionist/globalist puppet

Can you quote him from one of his books or speeches?

More like 4.

The question is why nobody just shoots Merkel?

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assassination_attempts_on_Adolf_Hitler
14 actually realized, with many others failing before being attempted.

falling for the christianity meme

Not to mention that he actually survived WW1, which is a feat in itself.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20_July_plot

Seems like a straightforward answer to their two-faced opportunist eternal chancellor problem.

because he was right

Unironically makes you wonder when examples like Hitler and Rasputin were kept alive after so many attempts to kill them, if there is indeed some kind of "divine" intervention. Hitler himself believed that after he survived and all his comrades died from a artillery shot in the trenches when he went for a piss.

...

>The Brits were worried that, if he was assassinated, he would be replaced by someone competent

Kershaw actually puts forth the idea that a successful assassination would result in a glorification of Hitler, and his supporters would claim that he was cut down before he could finish his work, doubly so if it was someone within Germany (yet another "stab in the back"). The Allies wanted to simply eradicate the Third Reich from the ground up, not give a possible martyr.

They tried multiple times.

As we found out many times over the 20th and 21st century, Germans are simply weak people.

>take the example of someone who used to give to the poor and needy just 2000 years before and they nailed him to the fucking cross.
In reality that was probably because he chimped out in temple plaza and started flipping the tables of the money changers during Passover.

You know how today you have ISIS and such always ramping up their attacks during Ramadan? Back then it was the same thing with the zealots and Passover. Every year the Romans would execute lots of political trouble makers around that time of year because they might be zealots. Jesus was just another one of them.

You descend from one large explosion that created everything we know.
You are experiencing the miracle of consciousness at every waking moment.
There is so much we ignore.
I find it likelier that the divine exists than the contrary.

All these consecutive miracles leading to your miraculous birth where your miraculously born father beats and rapes you as you miraculously survive to your teens until he ends up killing you and miraculously isn't caught
If there is divine intervention then it's a bitch

All experiences are valoratively neutral.
Sure, there is suffering, but there's nothing to say that suffering is "wrong" in the first place.
Divine intervention wouldn't care for human convention.
Do you feel sorry for the ants you kill when walking through the streets? You don't even realise.

The term miracle has a positive value, also stop making up words.

*Using made up words
Tho wtv that's a silly rabbit trail

>you would have thought many would have tried to kill him

lol, then disregard the word miracle.
Still, there's a reason your life is shit and your daddy raped your bunghole when you were a kiddie, enjoy it.

Also it is patently false and outright moronic to say that there is NOTHING to say that suffering is wrong. You can argue that objectively nothing suggests so, which is still probably wrong, but the subjective quality of needless pain quite literally founds most ethical notions of evil

(You)

he was bulletproof. He had an armored hat that weighed ten pounds. His aides thought it was funny to hand it to visiting officers and ask them to hang it up.

Also also, unwittingly stepping on ants directly contradicts the analogy of our consciousness being a consequence of divine intervention... If it were intended, than it is definitely evil. If not, than why it is unnecessary to posit it

*Definitively

Some of the perpetrators of the July 20th plot actually played with the idea of someone running what was basically a suicide mission and just walking up to Hitler and shooting him.

But no one involved wanted to do it because they thought it would be dishonorable to shoot an old, unarmed man.

But he wasn't any less old or unarmed when they tried to blow up his plane, so I don't understand their logic.