How would history change anons?

How would history change anons?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953791/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Does the Sahara even still exist? All of that water should moisten it into a savanna.

climate would be completely different to begin with

Japan, China, Korea, and the east coast of Russia get annihilated by mega-powerful hurricanes on a yearly basis.

Why did you chop off a bit of New Zealand?

anglos are servants as they should be

If the world is smaller then Colombo would had found the real indies

>OP is an Australian Aboriginal.

I shiggy diggy.

>England exist
>Israel exists
Into the trash

The North would become livable since no more NA means nothing can stop the equatorial currents from the pacific from connecting the Atlantic forming up the north Atlantic resulting in a Greenland that is actually Green.

The entire course of evolutionary history would be different, we'd probably never evolve sapient forms and instead still be Frenchmen.

>No Ethiopia

No Human kind then

Without Sub-Saharan Africa, he wouldn't have needed to look for a shorter route in the first place.

England would be far less powerful without its new world colonies.

I'm guessing either to get rid of Auckland and Northland as they are least white parts of the country, or more likely he did it accidentally and doesn't really care because we are irrelevant.

North Island BTFO. Also PNG.

You took out the entirety of east Africa, so humanity wouldn't exist. If it did, then they would be focused entirely in Asia. The entirety of Europe would be a frozen shithole thanks to the lack of warm currents from the Gulf of Mexico.

I moved Australia further south to prevent subhumans from entering it and making the climate more livable no more shitty desert allover the place now its a heavily forested temperate landmass ripe for the picking sometime.

this world looks way more comfy tbqh

>I moved Australia further south to prevent subhumans from entering it

Oh come now an Australia without Abos is heaven on earth.

Why so racist? Abbos are human beings just like you.

Quite a bit.
>No New world means Spain never becomes an Empire
>No Sub-Saharan Africa or America means Anglos forced to create settler colonies in Sudan and Malaya
>No Africa means Germany takes colonies from elsewhere, such as Morocco or Siam
>No Africa means no going around the Cape for Russia, victory at Tsushima
>No Scramble for Africa means Scramble for China
>Open ocean means warmer Arctic islands, allowing for Scandi colonization
>No America means no freedom, thus Poland never gets departitioned
>Easy access to India lessens the importance of Constantinople, creates weaker Ottomans
>Smaller colonial empires means imperialism never ends
>Stronk Russia means no WWI so no dissolution of A-H
etc. etc.

Great Britain would just put more effort into colonizing Africa then. Would probably put them in another conflict with the Middle East at some point.

Nevermind, I'm blind and didn't see Africa was gone too.

>Singling out the Abbos when the other rural Australians also exist.

Nobody wants to be around a bunch of religious weirdos and addicts and hillbillies.

Truely a perfect world anons.

Portugal and Spain skip around north Africa and colonize actual India first. so the Inquisition of Goa happens earlier

It would change a lot. Instead of europeans colonising the americas they would start crusade after crusade since that is the only territory they could expand to. This would probably result in religions and the catholic church never losing power and maybe even the industrialisation never happening, or happening in another part of the world first.

Constant crusades against Middle East.
North Africa(Algiers, Libya,Marocco) have actually quite a comfy coast line resembling Italy or South France, so you would see European settlement and colonies there.
Probably intense religious conflicts occupying Europe and Midde East for a long, long time.
Could mean world dominated between Russia and China.

>How would history change anons?
No humans in this world.
Maybe with more ocean space and lack of humanity octopi develop a civilization that eventually explores the land.

>Russia

would be even more backward technologically without a western europe that is dragging them with them.

This place would be dominated by China, or whomever wins in the euro-islam wars.

This. Not to mention so would Western Europe.

>humans are from Africa meme
No, humans are from Eurasia. We found fossils of proto-niggers in Ethiopia big deal that doesnt mean there werent proto-niggers in the middle east or Europe at that time in history.

No potatoes and no chocolate, because they are from America.

MASSIVE hurricanes hitting east china/japan.

Actually, Spain may industrialize earlier in this timeline. The massive gold abd silver looted from the Americas was terrible for the Spanish economy, created massive inflation and prevented the development of proper industry since the monopolies (asientos) with Spanish America were so profitable.

Don't you love it when a people fuck themselves over with their own greed? Spain got an almost biblical level of wrath from the Universe at that point and never recovered to this day and probably forever.

Humans never exist

At least leave bits of the Americas, like the Caribbean, Newfoundland, Patagonia, et cetera.

Humans came from Africa

This is common knowledge

With these changes it is likely that places like Spain or England would have completely different cultures and nations(different climate, different events, different people die and so on).
Come to think of it, with complete different climate the great migrations might look different too.

Wrong
Humans oldest remains came from Australia

Um no sweetie they didnt, its assumed humans came from Africrap since the oldest fossils are found there, but the fossils dont mean there werent proto-humans in India or Europe at the same time now. Human prehistory is an unsolvable clusterfuck.

In the abcense of better proof then it is to be fact that Humans originate from Africa unless other sources come up, you dumb nigger.

>g*rmany and shittan still exist
intothetrash.jpg

>WE WUZ KANGZ N SHEEIT
holy shit, eurotards are actually autistic.

No. You can cut everything east of Pakistan too

To spite them

This crap got debunked years ago and people are still saying it?

Europe would still be a backward area.

China would ofcourse be the only superpower.

Without the Eternal *****, humanity is able to reach new heights of spirituality and cognition, unburdened by war, hatred, stupidity, flatulence, siestas, or Jalapenos. Iron age technology is achieved in 10,000 B.C. Space travel is perfected by 3,000 B.C. By the present time, Mankind has colonized most of the Galaxy.

This, Europe would be freezing.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens

>The age of speciation of H. sapiens out of ancestral H. erectus (or an intermediate species such as Homo heidelbergensis) is estimated to have taken place at roughly 315,000 years ago. However, there is known to have been continued admixture from archaic human species until as late as some 30,000 years ago; this is also the time of disappearance of any surviving archaic human species, which were apparently absorbed by the recent Out-Of-Africa expansion of Homo sapiens beginning some 50,000 years ago.

FFS you’re retarded. Modern humans are african.

No, humans are Eurasian.

This is my ideal future

There is no evidence. Anatomically and genetically modern humans are from east Africa

Why does this make you so butthurt?

All bullshit, humans are Eurasian not African jackass. Niggers are not human.

Some fucking massive hurricanes

>t. atheinigger

t. Rranjeev

chink detected

Good bait
If not, fuck off pajeet

This

As long as you don't live in a city or up north you don't see them anyway

industrial recolution would have happened regardless in europe,the prime factor was the invention of the printer and with a more specialiced weapon evolving every day for the wars with ottomas.
So insteas of colnizationg the new world all the for ce will redidirect to eurrasia ,north africa and middle east would fall russia would have colonized siberia like it was doing so no chance there and once this position are secure european power would have moved to india and then china
So probably the live of the euroasitc continent remain diverse enought thank to the existence of america without them and all the resources available the crude nature of human wouldnt have let that some profitable land in india and china in the infidels hands

No one could possibly stop the Mongols 2nd coming.

so much talk about the industrial revolution but 1 step was the printer once all the information start to travel around the continent fast and cheap enought all the knowleage of milenial and all the new science like newton copernco travel the continent in weeks and not years and this happen before the dyscovery of america

There would be no humans and therefore, from our perspective, not history.

How? Hurricanes move east-west.

Culture north of Iberia never develops because without North America, there is no gulf stream to keep Northern Europe warm.

Paris is on the same latitude as Quebec, which is quite cold during the winter and not a good place to live before OTL 1600's technology. North Africa would be the center of Western Civilization, because everywhere else is too cold to support 2 season agriculture.

heartland theory might actually have merit in this universe

spain would have colonized north africa there were plans to do it( melilla and ceuta still remain in spanish hands) but since the discovery of america it wasnt profitable enouth the conquer of north africa
1500-1600
-colonization of north africa by spain
-colonization of siberia by russian like was already happening

No one would remember Christopher Columbus.

quintessentially human

this was the real revolution

...

looks comfier

Stop reciting dumb stormfag pseudoscience you worthless dropout. There is literally no explanation for the immense genetic diversity of Africa unless they existed first and non-african migrant populations were subjected to bottlenecks.

the real question is what would the wold look if only european existed?
except no anime i cant find any flaw

can you put a grafic proving your statement?

no tomatoes, so india and italy are still eating shit

checked

>no anime
>bad thing
Please God take me from this world

>can you put a grafic
Learn to read articles and stop being a stupid faggot.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953791/
>frican populations are characterized by greater levels of genetic diversity, extensive population substructure, and less linkage disequilibrium (LD) among loci compared to non-African populations
>The migration of modern humans out of Africa is thought to be accompanied by a population bottleneck. The size of the population(s) migrating out of Africa is estimated to be ~600 effective founding females (i.e., census size of ~1800 females) on the basis of mtDNA evidence

Richard D Fuerle is a failure in every walk of life by his own admission. Stop being a generic regurgitating stormfag faggot.

>t.paki

>Not leaving comfy archipelagos in the place of the Americas

Bullshit, take your jew crap somewhere else.

This desu.

>t. never met an abo

>t. never been outside a city

Colombus fucking dies .

But user, the oldest human remains found are in Morocco, not Ethiopia