Tfw all of the earliest civilizations appeared in modern-day muslim countries

Muslims are more like the ever encroaching expansion of Sahara desert. They spread like crazy and make everywhere they live unbearable. They are in perpetual war with all other civilizations.

More like Byzantines fucked over the Sassanids. The Sassanids were the good guys near the end. Heraclius went too far. Even Alexander was more noble than Heraclius.

ask yourself, when did islam appear? when did those earliest civilizations appear?

I mean that's like saying Native Americans are the smartest people of all time because they shared the same land with the people that created the first nuclear bomb...

He's got a point. At best they are good chroniclers of civilizations they've conquered. But their contributions are always minor innovations in certain fields. All major historical inventions and breakthroughs have happened in non-Muslim countries...this is undeniable.

We are talking about 10,000 years after humans crossed into the Americas here so idk what your point is.

Muslims just showed up and destroyed and assimilated everything. Egypt, India, Persia and Anatolia would have been so much better if not for Arabs and their various religious thralls over the centuries. Even Mongols did less damage than those savages.

Muslims civilized India

Brits aren't Muslims, user.

Everything you said is true not for Islam but for Western Civilization. True not for Muslims but for the huwite man. That is the irony of your postal. You only play games with words and context. Everything you accuse the Islam of being is what Western Civilization is in reality. That is why you madly play with words hoping to create an impression that all the Muslims in the world belong to some Islamic Civilization. The huwite man is a race of mad men that think reality is nothing more than words.

>We are talking about 10,000 years after humans crossed into the Americas here so idk what your point is

and it took 54k years for civilization to arise in mesopotamia after people got there, vs in Mesoamerica where it only took 11k-12k years after people got there

Well, they weren't at the time.

The Incatard señores...

They didn't civilize anybody except themselves.

I'm not even a westerner, I think western culture is shit too. But muslims are probably more destructive.

The western man is a plague virus in the form of humanoid creature. The fact that you speak of Muslims as the west does only shows the inferiority of your kind. The huwite race has been waging war on all humanity for over 500 years. And when we fight back against parasite crusade, the west accused us of seeking to crusade. They are a race of mad men that project what they are onto us.

>
>They didn't civilize anybody except themselves.

The Mughal used some symbols of Islam and therefore can be called Muslims. But them being Muslims has nothing to do with their wars in South Asia. Mughal is Mongol. Instead of putting the cause of their actions where it belongs, you take the fact that they shred some Islamic symbols to imply that what they did was caused by Islam. This is the classic example of western madness that I was talking about earlier. Them being muslims has nothing to do with what they did. The fact that you judge like the huwite man only proves your inferior nature. The huwite race has no understanding of cause and effect. It is a mad race.

The Huns, Turks and Mongols were behaving that way even before they became Muslims. Conversion to islam did not change their behavior . To blame their wars onislam, after they converted, but to not blame their pre-islamc religion for doing the same thing is a characteristic of the mad mind of inferior races. You have no inderstanding of cause and effect. Ironically, their preislamic religions conformed more closely to their race and waere warlike and aggressive.

>The Huns, Turks and Mongols were behaving that way even before they became Muslims.

Huns as an ethnicity never converted Islam since they disappeared and Mongols are majority Buddhist with a significant shamanist minority.

You have no fucking clue what you are talking about. The people that came to be called Turks used to be called Huns. I am speaking of iranic Huns that invaded South Asia. Thee pashtuns and gujjars are their twoain descended groups that converted to islam. There is a reason every other pasthun has Khan in their name.

>iranic Huns
Not Huns then

>Thee pashtuns and gujjars are their twoain descended groups that converted to islam. There is a reason every other pasthun has Khan in their name.
Because of the Mongols, Timur and the Mughals, not Huns.

>Because of the Mongols, Timur and the Mughals, not Huns.

lol, it has nothing to do with mongols, timur you fucking idiot. the pashtuns have been the greatest enemies of the mighals throughout history. claiming that they were enslaved and adopted the identity of their masters i the height of absurdity. the pashtuns were also called turks once. and the iranic huns are just as much huns as the huns that invaded europe. the owrs huns turks, mongols, scythians apply to many people that may not be connected to each other. words like huns and turks have meaning that were adopted by them for themselves at different points in time.

the muslim turks that were attacking the byzantines in anatolia in the 10 century and the huns of attila were from the same general population. the huns did not stop their attacks after attila. they eventually began converting to islam and now islam gets the blame for something that began in the 4th century, even before islam began.

>he muslim turks that were attacking the byzantines in anatolia in the 10 century and the huns of attila were from the same general population.

The absolute state of roaches.