Ancient Egyptians

Kek. Well godspeed to OP.

The original ones were close to the sumerians. You could call them caucasian if you want to stretch the concept of "whiteness" that far, but then you'd probably have to call indians white too then.

>caucasian
Why tho.

You tell me, /pol/ack.

Am I supposed to be seeing a resemblance?

What do you mean, why? People who share common acenstry with the peoples of the Caucasus Mountains are caucasoid. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race
Even people in the horn of africa would be considered caucasian by this broader definition.

African Americans that have caucasian parents or ancestors?

If you want to classify "african-american" as a phenotype then I guess you could possibly classify them as being more "caucasian" as in average they share ancestry with europeans compared to their native african counterparts. The concept of race in humans is fairly arbitrary, and while there are obviously distinguishable phenotypes like white, black and east-asian, there's a lot of in-betweens that make it complicated. I guess that's why people get so obsessed with egyptians, because they are obviously not white europeans but they are evidently not west africans.

As ridiculous as it would be to say this out loud, white europeans could probably have a bigger claim on being Kangs than african-americans, by some arbitrary but acceptable standard.

Only when you DNA test them, but if you really think about it, they weren't in Europe, so they couldn't have been.

>Egyptians
>Turkish-European
>Turkish
KARA BOGA

>The original ones were close to the sumerians.
Completely untrue, Sumerians have nothing to do with Egyptians. The modern descendants of Sumerians are the Marsh Arabs of southern Iraq and they're not clustering with Egyptians.

>but they are evidently not west africans
Oh of course. No debate here but this post is an interesting take on the whole situation.

I said sumerians as a vague example of a generic "caucasian" type, as it isn't white european but also not sub saharan african. My whole point, as I explained is that some anthropologists have classified peoples like the sumerians, the indians and the egyptians as caucasoids. If you agree or disagree with this broader definition of human races is a different conversation.

>The original ones were close to the sumerians.
This is literally what you said you troglodyte, stop backpedaling now.

But in the same post I proceed to make my case for both of them belonging to the same caucasoid group and that has been consistently my argument thus far. Why be a faggot about it?

WE

No sorry, but these guys were white

>The modern descendants of Sumerians are the Marsh Arabs of southern Iraq
I doubt there is any evidence of this.

Yes it has been proven conclusively king tut had a genetic testing they were descendants of the ancient aryans from Atlantis youtube.com/watch?v=HuJCsj4PrfU&list=PLtFnfSc9NwNzp___VQT02nbxkt-7TRtoB

gas yourself kike

>art vs genetic testing
gas yourself faggot those are from way later
youtube.com/watch?v=S9rDLyYxDVc

>turkish european

Fuck that shit we wuz steppe niggas not faggy desert dwellers who liked to build big pointy buildings in order to compensate.

They are fucking idiots. By Turkish they meant Neolithic Anatolia.

They aren't black or white, but mediterranean master race.

Meds are white

Meds =/= MENA mongrels

Ancient Egyptian - Natufian + some admixture from Neolithic Anatolia and Iran.

they were RED

youtube.com/watch?v=tHe4sc4348I

Only Europeans are white for the last fucking time.

They were genetically similar to the original Turks

>Brachycephalic subhumans
>Meds

Meds = North Africans + Levantines + Greeks
Spaniards = Meds raped by Celts
Italians = Celts raped by Meds

They're closest living relatives are Abyssinians, Nubians, and other niolitic peoples.

This. Egyptians were Mediterranean herrenvolk. Niggers and Snowniggers try to steal our history as always.

That's what Kushites and Upper Egyptians looked like. Lower Egyptians were closer to modern Egyptians.

Ancient Egypt wasn't a single people but an amalgamation of several ethnic groups, more Semitic and Mediterranean in the North and more Afro-Semitic and Ethiopid in the South.

Yes. And then the jews made them open the borders to black people, taught them about communism and drew pictures of interracial porn.

wrong, it's Palestinians and Bedouins.

...

>stamp "any questions" over their faces so it is difficult to make comparisons

caucasian =/= white. Indians are caucasian but obviously not white

this definitely matches how classical / contemporary historians described them

>As ridiculous as it would be to say this out loud, white europeans could probably have a bigger claim on being Kangs than african-americans, by some arbitrary but acceptable standard.
Technically speaking Chinese people and even American Indians have closer genetic ties to Egyptians than most sub-saharan african groups. The exception ofcourse being geographically close groups like Abyssinians, northern Sudanese, etc. due to intermixing.
Ofcourse this has nothing to do with Caucasian and is more the result of Africa's ridiculous human genetic diversity.

yet another thinly veiled pol thread, fuck off

WE

They were North Africans E1b1b

They did have some European/Nordic sex slaves tho :)

They were not related to you E-M81 Berbers, Rashid. Now go back selling hashish to French white teens in your banlieue.

Your ideas about race and genetics are reflecting the ethnic groups in your country. These are not universal through time an space but arbitrary snapshots of the genetic history of humanity.

wasn't Tutankhamun R1b? Why won't Egyptian authorities release the DYS values?

reuters.com/article/oukoe-uk-britain-tutankhamun-dna-idAFTRE7704OR20110801

Morrocan Arabs are mainly E-M78, François

Yes, but he was an outsider and his clade is R1b-V88(Chadian, Near Eastern)

They recently found some V88 among Iberian Beakers (without steppe ancestry).

uh, R1b1a1a2 (R-M269) used to be called R1b1a2 and I read that Tut shared his haplotype with ~1/2 of European men.
R-V88 used to be called R1b1c but is now called R1b1a2, this may be a source of confusion.

see

V88 is from Balkan/Ukrainian HGs. It has a confirmed presence there before the migration to Africa.

E-M81 is the subclade of E-M78 typically found among Berbers. It's non existent in Egypt.

>E-M81 is the subclade of E-M78
Nope

My mistake then

desu I don't even know if you're actually mistaken

>In Egyptian art men were generally depicted with red skin, indicating their vitality and during celebrations people would paint their bodies with red ochre and wear carnelian.
>Set had red hair, and people with red hair were thought to be connected to him.
>During the reign of Ramesses II dark red skin was used to depict women (ed. Graves-Brown 2008).

muh henna

Egyptians were Gaels everybody knows this

"no"

Of all the fascinating things about ancient Egypt why do you only care about skin color?

want to talk about how the Japs recently found a huge unknown chamber above the Grand Gallery? How about the North Shaft?

...

the study showed they were closer to ancient anatolians, not turks. and when it says they were more european, it means they were closer to europeans than they are today, not that they were more similar to europeans than to current north africans.

Assyrian larpers

GET THE FUCK OUT, THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HISTORY, GO BACK TO /POLTARD

only the ones in charge. They were the survivors of the hyperwar that restarted humam progress. They tried to build energysources but as they died, the technology died too and dumb niggers used the reactors as tombs lmao.

>the whiter the better clothes

The white people on the right were Lybians (berbers) not egyptians

They were Caucasian, but more closely related to the ancient population of the levante (no semites though)

point stands

This is a meme. I guess it's possible, but unlikely.

>based on a film that was made for the Discovery Channel.
It's not from a scientific study and naturally it was never published anywhere or peer-reviewed.

>muh better clothes
>a shitty tunic and a penis sheath
>being proud of this
Bronze age Libyans looked like this retard. It's totally Amazon-tribe tier primitive.

They never achieved the levels of exquisite clothing worn by Egyptian nobles.

Meanwhile in NON-WHITE Egypt...

You're just jealous of his dick sheath, admit it.

N-no

Probably more so than most people are comfortable with. For example one of the "Gebelein predynastic mummies" from 3,400 BC was named "Ginger" when they found him because he still had remnants of his living red hair. Though interestingly the museum the mummy is housed in now refuses to call him that because of "ethics policies".

Pretty ancient an Egyptian. That's before pyramids, the rule of Dwayne Johnson, or true mummies. When they threw the dead in sandy pits.

>"Ginger"
fuck, I remember learning about this as a kid now

They were probably a Caucasian people, but not white/Europeans

caucasian might be a stretch
caucasoid for sure though, but there was almost certainly a few negroids among their number

...

Being in Egypt in vacation right now I can tell you that people near Alexandria are different than people around Luxor.

doesn't mean much, those are modern Egyptians

WE

That unitonically looks alpha as fuck conpared to the beta egyptians