So, who was the best?

So, who was the best?

Patton. American's were and are shit tier tactians either way

Zhukov.

...

Out of americans?
Patton and Eisenhower, in the end of the day all american ww2 generals were shit.

>Zhukov
He was mediocre at best.

Devers was better than any of them.

William Slim

This.

He's Russia's equivalent of Rommel. Memed through the roof in spite of just as or more talented other commanders.

Rokossovski

fucking plebs, the patrician answer is always MacArthur

>William Slim
typical bong meme commander

How so? What do you mean?

And if they are so bad, then who is so much better?

t. Nakitsuki Washimata

t. Nigel Smith-Pelley Richelieu the Third Viscount Earl of Blumpf and Lesser Cowpies, JFO

Can someone give me a quick rundown of all of these generals?

t. Marudo Shakura

from left to right
1. poo
2. poo
3. pee pee
4. in
5. diapey

...

Comrades, lets put just enough pressure on the centre, and then smash their flanks and make pincer
Zhukov in a nutshell

>Patton and Eisenhower
This right here proves you know nothing of the war. Both sides considered Eisenhower far below, Marshall, Patton, Bradley, etc, and he concurred. He was always more of a politician.

You have less than fucking grade school knowledge and you're pretending to give a definitive answer. Fuck is wrong with this board

Bradley>Patton
Even Patton himself, in all his boastfulness, admitted this.

What's funny is the exact same thing could be said about Patton.

Bradley was the best the US had to offer.

Devers>Bradley

>Patton