Why are they so romanticized?

Hitler wouldn't attack Russia if Nicky was at the helm, try reading Mein Kampf. Hitler viewed the tsar's family with admiration as Nicky himself was of Germanic descent and was extremely anti-Semitic. He and Hitler would be natural allies.

Because the children were innocent, and didn't deserve to die.

The never would've been a Nazi Party if Imperial Russia had survived. Their platform was dependent on fear of the newly formed Soviet Union and its expanding influence. Without that seeming ominous threat on the horizon, Nazism remains on the fringes.

They're women. Men are pyssyslaves.

This board is literally the only place in the observable universe where thats true

>Hitler wouldn't attack Russia if Nicky was at the helm, try reading Mein Kampf.
Hitler thought that filthy subhuman slavs were just as bad as filthy subhuman Judeo-Bolsheviks.

rt.com/news/403226-matilda-scandal-porn-arson/

Good point, I also considered that. Nazis would never raise to prominence if they weren't a reaction to communist threat.

You're stupid.

>You're stupid.
Hey look it's a Slav who thinks that his kind wasn't considered as subhuman in nazi Germany. Read a fucking book about Goebbels or something, imbecile.

...

what and incredible beautiful girls they look like noblese should look like

chinese and russian emperorsthe last of his kind i sympathise with the worker that fought for a better and more fair world but its sad nonetheless they dont exist people like this anymore

>brutally suppressing Poles
Sounds like they would've gotten along splendidly

its me or medvedev look a lot like the emperor ?

I literally mentioned that Nicky was GERMANIC and not a Slav, and Hitler very much recognized that. You're
completely illiterate.

>implying Russian tsars ever liked shitty Poland

Lmao people really defend this fuck because commies fucked with 1933 situation. Russia was suffering mass famine every 5 years under Nik II. U think its a coincidence that holodomor finished the 5 year famine streak when it was under heavy industrialisatipn path? Talk about cherry picking the convinient facts and omtting the other information to reinforce the point. This faggot got what he deserved. His family though, sad story but thats life.

This, its easy to gloss over things when you didnt have to personally experiance the consequences of Romanov rule. Its not like we are going to films of a peasant girl weeping over loosing all 4 brothers in a single day on the Austrian front.

t. commie

Nickyboo

Tatiana died long before the murder of 1917.
Here's the proof.

...

...

Hello there

...

...

...

...

...

>GARF
>Garfield was behind all of this

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Nicholas II is perfect example why monarchy doesn't works
>person not competent enough to be a leader of his people
>becomes tsar anyway because Alexander III was his father

His father didn't prepared him at all to become a ruler.

This
Nobody on here gives a shit about the millions of Russian men who died in WW1, or the millions of men who died because of the Soviet Union, but a couple girls get killed and they won’t STFU.

>Nobody on here gives a shit about the millions of Russian men who died in WW1, or the millions of men who died because of the Soviet Union, but a couple girls get killed and they won’t STFU

>Lol, if you're sad about a specific family dying that means you don't care about anybody else. I'm so cool and edgy. Here, read my essay about how nothing matters and everybody should kill themselves!

...

Like Stalin said : A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic.
ps : i hate bolsheviks

>tfw you will never lead a rogue mission with the 17-year-old louis mountbatten through war torn russia to save his waifu

But they don’t even care about the Tsar’s son Alexei, who is also obviously an important figure. More so then the girls in most respects. He was killed just like them, but with the added suffering of his hemophilia all his life.
Yet all these Romanov threads, you’d think Alexei never existed. He’s never mentioned in any of the threads. They only post the girls and Alexandra.

Willy and Nicky

Look a bit before, I posted several pictures with him

If I only I was in that basement
I would take away gun from Yurovsky and personally execute cuck tsar and his family

t. virgin commie who needs attention to his miserable life

Nicholas II deserved for starting the war that ruined Europe forever.

>Nicholas II deserved for starting the war that ruined Europe forever.

What are you doing on Veeky Forums ? Go back to school

He was an anointed sovereign, in other words Christ.

You... do realize that the post was asking why they are so romanticized and I answered that question, right? Or did your massive amounts of inner butthurt cloud your reading comprehension?

Give people a Russian peasant who left behind photos and a diary and died a documented terrible death and people would bloo bloo over her, too.

>It's somehow Nicky's fault that Germany decided to invade half the continent.

So ? It's still making a point.

>Give people a Russian peasant who left behind photos and a diary and died a documented terrible death and people would bloo bloo over her, too.

And you're right about that.

Mannerheim had a portrait of the Year over his desk. When asked why after spending so much time fighting against Russians, he replied 'He was my Emperor.'

God Bless the Whites and God Save the Tsar.

>one of the most incompetent retards in Russian history was blessed by Christ
God needs to pick better Chosen Ones

Absolute monarchies are a very high risk/high reward type of government. Republics/democracies very rarely produce amazing governments, because they're run by the average person, and the average person is a retard. Collectively, their government can be slightly above retarded, but they're almost always mediocre.

With an absolute monarchy, you run the risk of getting a dipshit that will run his country into the ground. But you also have the opportunity to have a sovereign that will truly go down in history as "the Great."

"Absolutism sometimes produces a Nero, and sometimes produces a Marcus Aurelius. Democracy will often produce a Nero, but will never produce a Marcus Aurelius."

>So ? It's still making a point.

What point? "You don't give as shit about the peasants, you don't STFU about the Romanovs!!!" is a retardation-tier reply to a straight answer about why the Romanov family is romanticized.

It'd be like if someone asks "What do you think caused the Salem witch trials?" and someone answers and I reply "wow no one fucking cares about witch trials outside of Salem which killed thousands of men and women but 13 people die in Salem and no one will STFU." It'd be pretty damn stupid.

their deaths were pretty horrific

I never said that I don't give a shit about peasants.

But like you said, we have pictures, letters and stuff about the Romanov, so it's normal for us to look at them more than statistics.

Foreshadowing of a terrible fate if I ever saw it.

You need to work on your reading comprehension.

Why did the jews (Sverdlov, Goloshchyokin, Yurovsky, etc) kill em?

Because they're jews ?

It was self-defense.
Nicholas II was behind pogroms.

>4200095
Was the assasination of Alexander the 2nd by Hesia Helfman also in self defence?

>be Jews
>be kicked out of every country you've ever been in
>literally everyone in the world hates your fucking guts
>"Are we the bad guys? No, it's everyone else in the world that has a problem."

If everywhere you go smells like shit, check your shoe.

What are you implying? He messed with the peaceful nation of chosen people and paid the heavy price.

I'll dump some of the photos I have.

Also to answer your question for me it's just because of how good of a person Nicholas was. He genuinely loved his wife and his children in a world full of scandals and affairs regarding Russian aristocrats. I'll admit he was an incompetent ruler but that wasn't really his fault.

...

...

...

...

...

Democratic republics are very rarely led by average people, most are ran by oligarchs and their enablers from among the dlite. Do you think Trump, Clinton, Bush, Cameron, May, Macron, Merkel, Putin etc are average people?

Nikolaj II is one of the greatest arguments for a republic. He was the worst type of absolutist monarch/dictator, even worse than Kolchak. Worst combination of autistic manchild that was unnecesarily brutal and patheticaly weak to that degree he got influenced by Jewish shaman from Siberia that cucked him and controlled him through his Kraut wife.

...

...

...

...

...

What are the examples of him being a good person outside of letters showing that he loved his family?

>'ll admit he was an incompetent ruler but that wasn't really his fault.
Are you excusing him from his actions and the consequences of them? Or is it more just blaming his dad?

Because Communists burtually murdered the entire family

Read:

Did Mein Kampf mention annexing the non German Czechs?

Czechs are a made up ethnicity. Very recent. Why do you care about Germany annexing Bohemia(German historically btw) but not Poland annexing part of it's lands? In a thread about Romanovs no less.

>Jews
>peaceful nation

He does hate the Czechs quite a bit in Mein Kampf, essentially views them as traitors and considers the Habsburgs a bunch of cucks for liking Czechs.

Who are you kidding? Nicholas II was garbage. There were famines, pogroms, massacres, wars, revolts, etc. under him and his predecessors.

The commies were garbage but so was Nicholas.