They developed metallurgy while Europeans and Amerindians did not

Whiter than you, Mohammed

West Africans are believed to have had skipped the bronze age

Arab blades were shitty compared to Byzantine and Persian ones, try again.

>>Bronze and copper working gradually spreads into europe along trade lanes with mesopotamian cultures
>>this means euros stole something from arabs who didn't even exist yet for some reason
You are a nigger.

>no Punt, Azania or Makuria

Iron is plentiful and relatively easy to extract in a lot of places in Africa. On the other hand, until the development of steel, bronze was a superior material to iron. Easy to shape and work with thanks to it's low melting point, but durable and strong, and could be made very hard with cold forging.
The main reason for the shift from bronze to iron tools is believed to have been the collapse of trade routes that brought tin to places that had copper and vice versa, as those two metals are rarely found in locations close to each other.

not true
>Discoveries in Agadez region of the Niger show signs of copper metallurgy as early as 2000 BC. This date pre-dates the use of iron by a thousand years (Herbert 1984). Copper metallurgy seems to be an independent invention, because there is no clear evidence of influences from Northern Africa, and the Saharan wet phase was coming to an end, hindering human interactions across it. It appeared to not be fully developed copper metallurgy, which suggests it was not from external origins. The people used native copper at first and experimented with different furnaces styles in order to smelt the ore between 2500-1500 BCE (Ehret 2002).

That ain't how burden of proof works friend

seeand

Punto was not a civilization

Things like the nook culture and such show signs of advanced metallurgy and a non linear development of civilization

>iron is stronger than bronze
>didn't even have proper bronze, only copper
use some jove darned logic, please

>Logic
It's perfectly logical for bronze to be stronger than iron when you consider the end result of primitive iron ore refinement is pig iron.

So civilization is more so a transfer of technology like explained with the bronze age colaspe

Tanzanians might have forged steel centuries before Europeans en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haya_people

Mansa Musa stood there for an hour when that niBBa couldn't paint for shit

Eurangutans will deny this

>Amerindians did not

Mesoamericans and Andeans did, though: both extensive smelted and smithed gold and silver, and both also worked and smelted coppers and bronzes, the latter to great extent and the former to a more limited one.

*extensively

The Sahara was entirely inhabited by Caucasian iberomausurians that migirated into the region around 9000 BC from the magrehb or Spain during the wet period and stayed there.

Niggers were stuck in the Congo and weren't present at around that time in Niger.

this is a long time after that the Sahara had dried up by then

>implying they died out or moved on

Negroes can't into desert. While Caucasian strive, adapt and survive.

>muh
it's south eastern niger over 1000 years after the Sahara has gone dry and 2000 years too early for camels

Yeah ok if you consider BC ghana or nok civilizations then Europe had like 50 distinct prehistoric civilizations

The Sahara is were west Africans originally lived such as the mandinka or sonnike

No, negroids emerged from the Congo. It's literally an unrefutable fact.

no, do you know what the Bantu expansion is

This is completely correct, Caucasians thrive in every environment, from Finnish tundra to Arizona deserts.

No they migrated to the Congolese region from further up north that why west Africans aren't Bantu their Niger congo speakers and then theirs sudano sahelian architecture

Wrong. These are just post migrations. All negroids, every single family group of them whether Bantu or Niger Congo literally originated from Congo jungle.

A no the pygmies originated from their also that still some how prove that blacks did not develope metallurgy or the Ghana and Mali empire etc

Also Niger congo language group is called that because of the origins of it's speakers

I'm researching but haven't found anything to back your claim, do you mean pic related because if you do then we are all Congolese

>The Sahara was entirely inhabited by Caucasian iberomausurians
As far as I know, Iberomaurusians had already merged with Capsians and therefore became Proto-Berbers/Equidians. Indeed, they were Caucasoid, as shown on the Tassili frescoes, but these same frescos also tell us they had Negroid neighbours.

That's pretty fascinating.

some examples of copper tools

I shouldn't need to post examples of smelted and worked gold objects, since no fucking shit they had thoose, what do you thiink cortes wanted and you always see these people decked out in

>a literalist combination of archaeology and oral tradition

That is actually interesting.
Thanks user.

Some Chad r1b guys brought metallurgy and when niggers started using these tools they created enormous genocide creating Bantu and destroying everything else

Wow well argued!