Defends France

OBSESSED
please fuck off back to /bant/

the fuck are you talking about?

wrong thread?

>tell me again hos is he the "bad guy"?
Had a dodgy habbit of forcing countries to make dodgy relatives of his their rulers.

>angry anglo angry because of the truth
lel

*Destroys your legacy*

>War and Peace
>literally a 1600-page long shitpost
Was he, dare I say it, /ourguy/ ?

Only subhuman anglo scourage considers him a "bad guy"

Same way hitler was a "Bad guy" same way staling was a "bad guy" etc pp

The strongest men in history tend to get vilified to no end . And btw, losers always cry the loudest.

stalin and hitler were not strong, they were autists who murdered millions of their own civilians for no reason. napoleon helped to abolish feudalism and improve countries he occupied, all hitler and Stalin did was massacre innocents

On one hand:
>hates women
>wants to live alone in a cuck shed away from society
On the other:
>massive chad in his younger days
>rich and influential
>gifted to the point of genius

>be russian
>burn capital to stop napoleon from getting it
>bitch about napeoleon
top russian

>implying he needed any excuse

>be Russia
>attack France at the Italian-French border in 1798
>attack France in Czechia in 1805
>atttack France in East Prussia in 1806
>in 1812, the French are tired of your shit and invade
>"fucking evil frogs, how dare they!!!!"

>there are Napoleon appreciation threads made every day
>”why is he the bad guy?”

You’re preaching to the choir, ouiboo

>defends France
Losing 600 000 men and forcing unvilling men to fight sure is great!
>end the Terror
The Terror ended before him, if anything he reinstated tyrany after the 1798 election that saw gains for the royalists.
>abolishes feudalism and spreads the Napoleonic code to the countries that attacked France and he wreckted
He also spread ideas of Nationalism, you see how well that went, literally worse than Hitler.

>unvilling men to fight
e you retarder? how was he supposed to make a Levée en masse if they were unwilling to fight? the french army was also famous for his high moral, the ones who force people to fight were the monarchies

>he reinstated tyrany
Tyranny under the most capable man in history > The Terror

>He also spread ideas of Nationalism
Nationalism lead to the freedom of the subjugated people, he wasn't spreading skinheads

comparing Napoleon to Hitler is lindy tier, they have litle in common

>>they have litle in common
>They both conquered Europe
>They both had eagles on the top of their standards
>They both made the English dunkirk from the continent and hide on their island
>They both lost to Russia

Why did you delete this superior version of your pic ?

Anyone in modern times who thinks he's bad or evil is someone who just doesn't know history

IIRC, Napoleon was used as one of the historical villains that the Minions followed, those little animated dreamworks things. I guess they couldn't use Hitler lol

>ruins the borders of Europe
>replaced feudalism by becoming the king of france
>literal cuck(but since he is french it´s more of a cultural difference beetwen France and not France)
>fights the anglo and loses
>makes the Germans create their own unified country
>too autistic to make a peace deal with Russia to assert dominance on all of middle and western Europe
>got beat by spanish people hiding under rocks
He was not the bad guy as in evil more like bad as in doing everything poorly

>ruins the borders of Europe
Shouldn't of attacked him then
>replaced feudalism by becoming the king of france
It wasn't a return to feudalism tho
Even nobility titles had become meritocratic, and they no longer had privileges
>literal cuck(but since he is french it´s more of a cultural difference beetwen France and not France)
Granted
>fights the anglo and loses
He lost to a Russo-German coalition
>got beat by spanish people hiding under rocks
He never even bothered getting there himself
The second-rate army he sent there stalled the Anglo-Spaniards for 6 years, and could probably have done so for decades if it hadn't been for the Russian desaster

>abolishes feudalism
Why does this meme keep getting spread? Feudalism was already dead when the Revolution happened, having been pretty much abolished by Louis the XIV.
Also
>spreads the Napoleonic code
>implying that's a good thing

>namefagging
Y tho

>Levée en masse
Forcefull conscription that most of the burden went on the poorer population that had to serve in arms for pay.
>he french army was also famous for his high moral
Outnumbering your enemies so that you can keep fighting has its benifits.
> the ones who force people to fight were the monarchies
Monarchies didn't use conscription, also tell that to the German and Italian populace that was forced to fight and produce for Napoleon.
>Nationalism lead to the freedom of the subjugated people, he wasn't spreading skinheads
It only leads to suffering of the subjugated people i.e Hungary and Magyarzation under Austria-Hungary. Despite Hungarians only consisting of 43% of the population in the Kingdom of Hungary, they went for a policy of Magyarzation against the majority of the people.

>defends France
He did in fact defend France on several occasions.

They were conveniently "lost" between Napoleon and Gru.

Thread theme

youtube.com/watch?v=-SHkx9A9488

delete this

>Fucks Polish QT
>Fucks Austrian Princess
>Loads of other QT's

Hero of France allright

>king of france
I think you mean Emperor of the French

>starts world war 1 and thus 2
>kills billions of Jews and Germans
/OurGuy/

This desu

>kill 2 millionn of French in the process
Bourbon and post-Bouron France are JOKEs.

>Valuing material possessions.

Top goy.

What you gonna do, bring a Churchill to a Stug fight?

>complaining about the Levee en masse when other countries had no qualms doing it much later than him and were seen as right for doing it
>he was outnumbered in a large number of the battles he won
>implying the UK or any nation in WW1 never used conscription
>implying Poland glassed the native Germans in Danzig

Spain considers him a bad guy. Backstabbing your allies is not very nice.

>decide to have a retarded civil war for no reason

He's not.

People just don't like losers, and his loss at Waterloo defines him.

Doesn't justify treason. Spain was easily one of his most loyal allies.

>treason against a country that isn't yours

>you can't betray an ally
Do you know what an ally is?

>defends France
and lost. also way more aggressive than his predecessors. reconquering haiti is a stain on his record. inb4 niggers it was a brutal fruitless campaign
>ends the Terror
terror ended in 1794
>abolishes feudalism
1789. LITERALLY the first the national assembly does is abolish feudalism
>fights the Eternal Anglo
and loses. At least the people before him beat the Anglo.

...

>Ally with the poles, promising them liberation and restitution of their nation
>they fight for you fiercely throughout Europe, singlehandedly allowing you to conquer Madrid
>Napoleon sends you to some island in the middle of nowhere to fight a slave rebelion
>poles realise they are literally fighting to reinstate slavery and chimp out, joining the nog rebelion
>meanwhile austrians attack the meme nation you carved up for the poles, don't help poles out in any shape, poles still win alone
>meanwhile force poles to pay up some random loan prussians had, while also forcing them to feed, clothe, supply and pay for your troops on their territory
>they still remain loyal, even while every single other ally of yours betrays you after you go full retard and invade russia

wew

youtube.com/watch?v=lKabHFkrusU

I BEG YOUR PARDON SIR?

I suppose it's the millions of pointless deaths he is responsible for

he understimated the perfidiousness of the albions

He named

Why havent I heard of this battle?
>t. Texan

texas was under Mexico at that time silly goose

>one lasted for centuries, arguably over a millenium
>other two didn't make it to two full decades
hmmmm

The Roman empire's enemies couldn't organize together into coalitions to take it down. You can be sure that if Hitler and Napoleon had been fighting countries 1v1, they would have won everything. They both almost did despite said coalitions existing.

I feel like i would have heard of that battle, having been to the site myself

>non tyranical
>peasants in england had less rights than niggers in USA