Was it autism?

Was it autism?

It was the strict hierarchy that was needed to create the western civilization

but yes it was also autistic

how will a inverted pyramid work,it would be funny to see

the gold backing the economy literally hitler

humans need social hierarchy, just like lobsters.

like democracy

true, is so hard to imagine a real one in usa

Knights are nobility

It was actually the social structure of the late Roman period in a desperate attempt to keep their shit together.

Explain pls I've heard this before

Diocletian reforms

Since they wanted to keep believing they were still a republic most imperial government structures were completely de facto and usually unstable. Any fucker can become emperor if they get the support of the army and the infrastructure was torn apart during the many civil wars. So a rigid structure was put in place to make things more stable. It didn't work but the Germanic tribes re-worked it with the catholic church to make it the class system we know and love (this time it worked better since at least only a select few can cause chaos).

>real estate has more liquidity than otc stocks

intredasting

Yes. Peasants had no way of raising class. Capitalism essentially cleans up what feudalism trips up on

It's not a pyramid scheme, it's an inverse funnel system.

Pretty good chart. Please post more like this

Yeah right? It’s bullshit

No. It was perfection.

>You mad leftypol?

Not leftypol, but pretty capitalist. Can you explain how one would move up their economic status if they were peasants?

Sir have you seen the documentary "A Knight's Tale"

autism is when boys are completly masculine instead of having a balance of both male and female traits.

autistic boys fixate on objects, architecture and numerical rational. which are masculine traits.

females are social and have higher intelligence. these traits are extremely lacking in autistic boys.

lmao love that reference, these under agers won't get it though
Peasants aren't serfs genius.

reddit

you forgot the pope

Not exactly.

While regional customs differed, generally speaking "Knight" was not a title of nobility but an award that came with certain privileges (but also duties) that were akin to that of nobility. There were knights that were noblemen but the majority of knights were serfs (usually from families that have been in service to noble families for generations) that have been elevated through knighthood.
Knighthood was not inheritable. Although a knight's son was practically more eligible for knighthood, he would not inherit his father's title.
During the late middle ages this changed however and knightly families essentially became a part of lesser nobility.

Starting at the bottom it goes from most liquid to least liquid ya dinguses.

>capitalist
Why should anyone move anywhere with any economic system?

>the pope
how many divisions he got?