What did he do?
William of Ockham
One of the three great medieval theologians alongside Thomas Aquinas and Duns Scotus
Most notably famous for Ockham's razor which states that the simplest explanation is most typically the correct one.
He looks like my old maths teacher after I fucked up a question.
Not quite pity, not quite disgust.
He brought about and age of nominalism that has led to the destruction of values and objectivity, and ultimately the decline of the West.
>decline of the west
>700 years ago
Please
>be christfag
>unwittingly BTFO christianity
Bump
>Copernicus
>Galileo
>Darwin
am I mistaken or did this happen a lot?
How did Darwin any of those guys BTFO Christianity?
*cuts your argument down to size*
none of these people did anything to Christianity.
Funnily enough i live very near Ockham in Guildford
Any fellow Guildfordians here?
except when they proved that the bible is essentially fiction
How?
the sun not moving around the earth, all species not being created in their present forms, adam and eve not being the first humans, etc
When does the bible ever explicitly state any of that as fact?
No? Aristotelian cosmology is not in the Bible and the conflict between Galileo and Church was largely social. not theological. As far as Darwin is concerned no one really cared outside of American Proddies.
Imagine being this much in denial kek. Christfags on suicide watch
How did he btfo Christianity?
Wasn't it Thomas Aquinas who claimed that existence of God could be proved by logical reasoning?
>Encourage theologicans start using logic to understand the nature of religion.
What could go wrong?
all three of them were christian though
Not Darwin.
Yes he was
Tell me more about Adelard of Bath and the Oxford Calculators, gentlemen
Medieval English philosophers were unironically the best
the bible isn't meant to be a history, it's legends and myths, with only occasional rough historical alignment.
>He takes ancient allegories as fact
The authors of the Genesis myth were much, much smarter than you user
So then why did people read it as history up until around the 19th century?
>ancient allegories
[citation needed]
>So then why did people read it as history up until around the 19th century?
Not him, but the obvious answer would be for control. If you control the framework of knowledge you control knowledge itself...
He made razors, he became quite good at it too.
>So then why did people read it as history up until around the 19th century?
Except they didn't.
They were pretty great
No they weten’t Retard
Except they did.
Keep telling yourself that