William of Ockham

What did he do?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Charles_Darwin#Darwin's_loss_of_faith
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Earth_creationism#History
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

One of the three great medieval theologians alongside Thomas Aquinas and Duns Scotus
Most notably famous for Ockham's razor which states that the simplest explanation is most typically the correct one.

He looks like my old maths teacher after I fucked up a question.
Not quite pity, not quite disgust.

He brought about and age of nominalism that has led to the destruction of values and objectivity, and ultimately the decline of the West.

>decline of the west
>700 years ago
Please

>be christfag
>unwittingly BTFO christianity

Bump

>Copernicus
>Galileo
>Darwin

am I mistaken or did this happen a lot?

How did Darwin any of those guys BTFO Christianity?

*cuts your argument down to size*

none of these people did anything to Christianity.

Funnily enough i live very near Ockham in Guildford
Any fellow Guildfordians here?

except when they proved that the bible is essentially fiction

How?

the sun not moving around the earth, all species not being created in their present forms, adam and eve not being the first humans, etc

When does the bible ever explicitly state any of that as fact?

No? Aristotelian cosmology is not in the Bible and the conflict between Galileo and Church was largely social. not theological. As far as Darwin is concerned no one really cared outside of American Proddies.

Imagine being this much in denial kek. Christfags on suicide watch

How did he btfo Christianity?

Wasn't it Thomas Aquinas who claimed that existence of God could be proved by logical reasoning?
>Encourage theologicans start using logic to understand the nature of religion.
What could go wrong?

all three of them were christian though

Not Darwin.

Yes he was

Tell me more about Adelard of Bath and the Oxford Calculators, gentlemen

Medieval English philosophers were unironically the best

the bible isn't meant to be a history, it's legends and myths, with only occasional rough historical alignment.

was

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Charles_Darwin#Darwin's_loss_of_faith

>He takes ancient allegories as fact
The authors of the Genesis myth were much, much smarter than you user

So then why did people read it as history up until around the 19th century?

>ancient allegories
[citation needed]

>So then why did people read it as history up until around the 19th century?
Not him, but the obvious answer would be for control. If you control the framework of knowledge you control knowledge itself...

He made razors, he became quite good at it too.

>So then why did people read it as history up until around the 19th century?
Except they didn't.

They were pretty great

No they weten’t Retard

Except they did.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Earth_creationism#History

Keep telling yourself that